Pleomorphism as a Sequential Phenotypic Manifestation in Blood Flagellates of Different Vertebrate Groups
Neelima Gupta, Centre of Excellence Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Gupta DK, Department Biotechnology, Bareilly College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
- *Corresponding Author:
- Neelima Gupta
Centre of Excellence Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly 243006, Uttar Pradesh, India
E-mail: [email protected]
Received Date: October 21, 2016; Accepted Date: October 24, 2016; Published Date: October 31, 2016
Objective: The objective of the research work was to observe pleomorphism (more than one morphological phenotypic expression of a species) in flagellate parasites (Trypanosoma and Trypanoplasma). Methods: The blood of selected vertebrate hosts (fishes, amphibians, reptiles and mammals) was scanned for haemoflagellate infectivity by examination of fresh blood (hanging drop preparations and haematocrit) and stained smears. The flagellate parasites (Trypanosoma and Trypanoplasma) were morpho-taxonomically identified and the phenotypic manifestation expressed as pleomorphism recorded for each species. Outcomes: Twenty-four species of trypanosomes from 12 fish hosts were discovered (12 species monomorphic, 6 each dimorphic and polymorphic). From amphibians and mammals, only monomorphic forms were encountered. The reptiles (Hemidactylus flaviviridis, Calotes versicolor) were not susceptible to trypanosome infection. Conclusions: Host-wise analysis indicated that Heteropneustes fossilis was most susceptible to trypanosomes. Trypanoplasms from fish too exhibited pleomorphism (6 species monomorphic, 2 each dimorphic and polymorphic).
Blood; flagellate; pleomorphism; Trypanosoma; Trypanoplasma
Pleomorphism is the ability of organisms to alter their shape or size. It is one of the most remarkable feature of trypanosomes and is also apparent in trypanoplasms. Pleomorphism is the sequential phenotypic manifestation of a single genotype as it appears in the trypomastigote stage in the vertebrate host. The phenomenon is triggered by changes in the host antibody spectrum. There are a few fish trypanosomes which seem to be virtually monomorphic, displaying only variability in size and/or in length/width ratio. The developmental stages in their vertebrate host, if any, seem to be limited to other than morphological manifestations.
The blood flagellates, Trypanosoma and Trypanoplasma are widely reported to dwell in the blood of vertebrate hosts (Gupta, 1994., Woo, 2003., Gupta, 2006) but studies pertaining to the expression of pleomorphism are rare. The present study examines the morphology of the trypanosomes and trypanoplasms infecting different vertebrate hosts from Uttar Pradesh, India. Pleomorphism in these parasites based on intra specific morpho-variants is reported.
Materials and Methods
Live host samples were obtained from the local fishing grounds (fish), ponds or amphibious habitats (amphibians), and domestic habitats, godowns and laboratories (lizards and rats). They were acclimatized to laboratory conditions and maintained in the Animal House of the Department of Animal Science under adequate conditions of food and water. Diagnosis of infection of blood parasites was done by hanging drop preparation or microhaematocrit (4000 rpm) and parasites observed in the buffy layer. The parasites were identified by preparing at least 4-6 films of fresh blood on methanol cleaned slides by aseptic microtechniques. The films were air dried, fixed in methanol and stained in Giemsa/Leishman (Qualigens) and buffer (Hale, 1965) in the ratio of 1:7, mixed uniformly by a thin hair brush, stained for 40-50 mins and mounted in DPX (Gupta, 1986 and Gupta, 2010). The microphotographs were taken under oil immersion in LEICA-DMLB microscope. The forms were drawn to scale, measured, tabulated and morphotaxonomically identified.
A. Trypanosome Infectivity and Pleomorphism
Flagellates discovered from fishes up to mammals could range from monomorphic to polymorphic forms. The facts given below are the compiled information of the entire work.
Twenty-four species of trypanosomes from 12 fish hosts have been discovered. Out of these, 12 species were monomorphic, 6 dimorphic and 6 polymorphic. Out of these, from Heteropneustes fossilis, 2 monomorphic (T. kargenensis Gupta and Gupta, 1994., T. karelensis Gupta et al. 2000), 2 dimorphic (T. artii Gupta et al. 2002., T. heteropneusti Gupta et al. 2006) and one polymorphic (T. singhii Gupta and Jairajpuri, 1981) species were discovered. From Channa punctatus, one monomorphic (T. rohilkhandae Gupta and Saraswat, 1991), 2 dimorphic (T. aligaricus Gupta and Jairajpuri, 1982., T. saulii Gupta et al. 2006) and one polymorphic (T. bareilliana Gupta et al. 1987) were discovered. From Colisa (Trichogaster) fasciata, 2 monomorphic (T. trichogasteri Gupta and Jairajpuri, 1981., T. piscidium Gupta et al. 2003), one new variety (T. trichogasteri var. nov. fasciatae ) and one polymorphic (T. colisi Gupta, 1986) species were discovered. From Mystus vittatus, one monomorphic (T. bagroides Gupta and Gupta, 1996) and one dimorphic (T. tengari n.sp., Gupta et al. 2015) whereas from Catla catla, one monomorphic (T. monomorpha Gupta and Jairajpuri, 1985) and one new variety (T. monomorpha var. nov. catlae Gupta et al., 2000) were discovered. Amongst the remaining species, 3 of them were monomorphic (T. notopteri Gupta and Jairajpuri, 1985 from Notopterus notopterus; T. ritae Gupta and Yadav, 1989 from Rita rita; T. danilewskyi Laveran and Mesnil, 1904 from Cyprinus carpio), one dimorphic (T. batrachi Gupta and Jairajpuri, 1983 from Clarias batrachus) and three polymorphic (T. attii Gupta and Jairajpuri, 1981 from Wallago attu; T. barbi Gupta et al. 1987 from Barbus barbus; T. ticti Gupta et al. 1998 from Puntius ticto) species have been put on record (Table 1).
In addition to the above, representative vertebrates from Amphibia (Rana tigrina, Bufo melanostictus), Reptilia (Hemidactylus flaviviridis, Calotes versicolor), Aves (Columba livia) and Mammals (Rattus rattus from India and Clethrionomys glareolus, Apodemus flavicollis and Microtus oceanus from Poland) were also examined for flagellate parasites. Amongst these, the infected hosts were Bufo melanostictus (T. bisalpurensis n. sp. unpublished), Rana tigrina (T. rotatorium Mayer, 1843), Rattus rattus [Trypanosoma (Herpetosoma) lewisi Laveran and Mesnil, 1901], Clethrionomys glareolus [Trypanosoma (Herpetosoma) evotomys Molyneux, 1969], Apodemus flavicollis [Trypanosoma (Herpetosoma) grosi kosewiense Karbowiak and Wita, 2004] and Microtus oeconomus [Trypanosoma (Herpetosoma) microti Laveran and Pettitt, 1909] (Table 1). It was interesting to conclude that amongst fishes, monomorphic, dimorphic as well as polymorphic forms were observed but from amphibians and mammals, only monomorphic forms were encountered. The reptiles (Hemidactylus flaviviridis, Calotes versicolor), however, were not prone to trypanosome infection. Host-wise analysis indicated that Heteropneustes fossilis was most susceptible to trypanosomes (Table 2).
|1.||T. trichogasteri||Trichogasterfasciata||Monomorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1981|
|2.||T. singhii||Heteropneustesfossilis||Polymorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1981|
|3.||T. attii||Wallagoattu||Polymorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1981|
|4.||T. aligaricus||Ophiocephaluspunctatus||Dimorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1982|
|5.||T. batrachi||Clariasbatrachus||Dimorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1983|
|6.||T. monomorpha||Catlacatla||Monomorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1985|
|7.||T. notopteri||Notopterusnotopterus||Monomorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1985|
|8.||T. colisi||Colisafasciata||Polymorphic||Gupta, 1986|
|9.||T. bareilliana||Channapunctatus||Polymorphic||Gupta et al.,1987|
|10.||T. barbi||Barbusbarbus||Polymorphic||Gupta et al.,1987|
|11.||T. ritae||Rita rita||Monomorphic||Gupta andYadav, 1989|
|12.||T. rohilkhandae||Channapunctatus||Monomorphic||Gupta andSaraswat, 1991|
|13.||T. kargenensis||Heteropneustesfossilis||Monomorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1994|
|14.||T. danilewskyiLaveran and Mesnil, 1904||Cyprinuscarpio||Monomorphic||Gupta andPilarczyk, 1994|
|15.||T. bagroides||Mystusvittatus||Monomorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1996|
|16.||T. trichogasterivar.nov. fasciatae||Colisafasciatus||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,1998|
|17.||T. tictin.sp.||Puntiusticto||Polymorphic||Gupta et al.,1998|
|18.||T. monomorphavar.nov. catlae||Catlacatla||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,2000|
|19.||T. karelensis||Heteropneustesfossilis||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,2000|
|20.||T. artii||Heteropneustesfossilis||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2002|
|21.||T. piscidium||Colisafasciata||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,2003|
|22.||T. saulii||Channapunctatus||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2006|
|23.||T. heteropneusti||Heteropneustesfossilis||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2006|
|24.||T. tengari||Mystusvittatus||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2015|
|2.||T. rotatorium||Ranatigrina||Monomorphic||Mayer, 1843|
|1.||Trypanosoma(Herpetosoma)lewisi||Rattusrattus||Monomorphic||Laveran and Mesnil, 1901|
|4.||Trypanosoma(Herpetosoma) microti||Microtusoeconomus||Monomorphic||LaveranandPettitt, 1909|
Table 1: List of Trypanosoma Species.
|Heteropneustesfossilis||T. singhii||Polymorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1981|
|T. kargenensis||Monomorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1994|
|T. karelensis||Monomorphic||Gupta et al., 2000|
|T. artii||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2002|
|T. heteropneusti||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2006|
|Channapunctatus||T. aligaricus||Dimorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1982|
|T. bareilliana||Polymorphic||Gupta et al.,1987|
|T. rohilkhandae||Monomorphic||Gupta andSaraswat, 1991|
|T. saulii||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2006|
|Colisafasciata||T. trichogasteri||Monomorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1981|
|T. colisi||Polymorphic||Gupta, 1986|
|T. trichogasteri var.
|Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,1998|
|T. piscidium||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,2003|
|Mystusvittatus||T. bagroides||Monomorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1996|
|T. tengari||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,2015|
|Catlacatla||T. monomorpha||Monomorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1985|
|T. monomorpha var.
|Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,2000|
|Wallagoattu||T. attii||Polymorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1981|
|Clariasbatrachus||T. batrachi||Dimorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1983|
|Notopterusnotopterus||T. notopteri||Monomorphic||Gupta andJairajpuri, 1985|
|Barbusbarbus||T. barbi||Polymorphic||Gupta et al.,1987|
|Rita rita||T. ritae||Monomorphic||Gupta andYadav, 1989|
|Cyprinuscarpio||T. danilewskyi Laveran andMesnil, 1904||Monomorphic||Gupta andPilarczyk, 1994|
|Puntiusticto||T. ticti||Polymorphic||Gupta et al.,1998|
|Ranatigrina||T. rotatorium||Monomorphic||Mayer, 1843|
Table 2: Host-Wise List of Trypanosomes Discovered
B. Trypanoplasm Infectivity and Pleomorphism
Trypanoplasms are characteristic of fishes. Ten species of this parasite have been recorded during this entire period. These parasites too exhibited pleomorphism: 6 forms being monomorphic, 2 dimorphic and 2 polymorphic. Mystus vittatus was infected with T. guptii Gupta and Gupta, 1987 (polymorphic) and T. tengari Gupta et al. 1988 (monomorphic), Cyprinus carpio with T. golysiana Gupta and Pilarczyk, 1994 (monomorphic) and T. polygolysiana Gupta and Pilarczyk, 1994 (polymorphic); Clarias batrachus with T. (Cryptobia) maguri Gupta and Gupta, 1997 (dimorphic), T. haematalis Gupta and Gupta, 2010 (monomorphic) and T. monomorpha. n.sp (unpublished) (monomorphic). Puntius ticto was infected with T. cyprinoides Gupta et al. 1998 (dimorphic) and a new variety, T. sarnae var. nov. sophorae Gupta and Gupta, 2014 and Catla catla with T. catli Gupta et al. 1999 (monomorphic) (Table 3). Host-wise analysis for trypanoplasm infectivity indicated that Clarias batrachus was the most prone species (Table 4).
|1.||T. guptii||Mystusvittatus||Polymorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1987|
|2.||T. tengari||Mystusvittatus||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,1988|
|3.||T. golysiana||Cyprinuscarpio||Monomorphic||Gupta and Pilarczyk, 1994|
|4.||T. polygolysiana||Cyprinuscarpio||Polymorphic||Gupta and Pilarczyk, 1994|
|5.||T. (Cryptobia) maguri||Clariasbatrachus||Dimorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1997|
|6.||T. cyprinoides||Puntiusticto||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,1998|
|7.||T. catli||Catlacatla||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,1999|
|8.||T. haematalis||Clariasbatrachus||Monomorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 2010|
|9.||T. monomorpha. n.sp.||Clariasbatrachus||Monomorphic||Unpublished|
|10.||T. sarnae var. nov.sophorae||Puntiusticto||Monomorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 2014|
Table 3: List of Trypanoplasma Discovered from Fish Hosts
|1.||Mystusvittatus||T. guptii||Polymorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1987|
|2.||T. tengari||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,1988|
|3.||Cyprinuscarpio||T. golysiana||Monomorphic||Gupta andPilarczyk, 1994|
|4.||T. polygolysiana||Polymorphic||Gupta andPilarczyk, 1994|
|5.||Clariasbatrachus||T. (Cryptobia) maguri||Dimorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 1997|
|6.||T. haematalis||Monomorphic||Gupta and Gupta, 2010|
|8.||Puntiusticto||T. cyprinoides||Dimorphic||Gupta et al.,1998|
|9.||Catlacatla||T. catli||Monomorphic||Gupta et al.,1999|
|10.||Puntiusticto||T. sarnaevar. nov.sophorae||Monomorphic||Gupta et al., 2014|
Table 4: Host-Wise List of Trypanoplasms Discovered from Fish Hosts
It has been observed in the past that during the course of infection, most fish trypanosomes display forms successively differing conspicuously in their shape and size; they were designated by early authors (Laveran, 1912) as the pleomorphic forms, “var. parva ” or “var. magna ” and sometimes these forms were erroneously credited with separate taxonomic status (Fantham, 1919), as even reported in later times (Bauer, 1984). However, it soon became clear that these are but extremes in the sequence of forms occurring during the course of infection with one species (Minchin, 1909., Briendl, 1915., Laird, 1951., Khan, 1976). Out of the large number of piscine Trypanosomes, only in a few has the full sequence been established.
In such pleomorphic species, the first trypanosomes to appear in the blood of the infected host are the “young” forms-rather small and slender with a few, shallow waves of the undulating membrane and nucleus revealing no distinct karyosome. After some time, intermediate forms appear until, eventually, “adult” forms prevail to persist during the chronic phase of infection. They are large, stout, sometimes very wide, and usually have a richly spiraling undulating membrane with numerous bends, a nucleus with a prominent karyosome and sub-surface striation. They often have more chromatic granules in their cytoplasm and free flagellum is shorter than in the young forms. Depending on the phase of infection at which the fish is examined, one finds young, slender or large adult forms only, or intermediate ones. A mixture of forms is probably the result of sequential leech feeds.
The existence of a sequence of different morphological types of trypanoplasms during the course of infection in carps was firmly established early (Keysselitz, 1906). Although he misinterpreted numerous stages both in the blood and in the leech as ‘gametes’, his reproduction of polymorphism is the most complete to be found in existing reports. The sequence of stages was confirmed in goldfish (Robertson, 1911), in loaches (Briendl, 1915) and in tench (Kipp, 1968) trypanoplasms. Trypanoplasma catostomi in parasite-free fingerlings of the host fish were noted (Bower, 1977) and the authors observed a remarkable polymorphism including the size as well as differing body structure coupled with the progress of the infection originally started by the introduction of a single flagellate into the host. In view of the paucity of information, sequential pleomorphism in blood-stream stages of trypanoplasms may or may not be a generally distributed phenomenon (Lom, 1979).
Pleomorphism is expressed in the following features:
1. Size changes.
2. Changes in length/width ratio i.e. slender or broad forms.
3. The number, width and depth of the waves of the undulating membrane.
4. The presence or absence of a distinct karyosome in the nucleus by light microscopy.
5. Presence and number of stainable cytoplasmic granules.
6. Length of the free end of the flagellum.
7. Distance of the kinetoplast from the posterior end.
8. Shifts in the position of the nucleus in the body.
9. Presence of subsurface pellicular striation (“myonemes”) in stained preparations by light microscopy (longitudinal or spirally oriented striations, probably sub-pellicularly located ribbons of mitochondrial systems.
Separate morphological stages may be defined by the combination of the above characters; marked changes of points 1 to 5 are proper to truly polymorphic species while changes in points 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 may also be found in “monomorphic” species.
Pleomorphism in Trypanosoma is well marked in having a markedly variegated shape and five different stages in varying combinations at various periods of the digenetic life cycle (vertebrate and invertebrate hosts) may occur (trypomastigote, amastigote, promastigote, sphaeromastigote and metacyclic stages). However, trypomastigotes are the predominant stages reported from fish blood, but in the vertebrate blood too, pleomorphism may be visible as seen above.
Pleomorphism in fish trypanosomes has been reported by some authors (Becker 1979 Joshi 1979) without assigning any names whereas others have given specific names to the various forms. ‘Large’ and ‘small’ forms of T. remarki (Laveran, 1907); Type I, II and III (Tanabe, 1925); small, medium and large (Dutton 1907); small and large forms of T. striati (Qadri, 1955); large and stumpy forms of T. batrachi (Qadri, 1962); slender and broad forms of T. occidentalis (Becker, 1967); short, elongated and stumpy forms of T. aori (Joshi, 1982) have been distinguished in different species of Trypanosoma by various authors.
The form that predominates depends on the course of infection, which again in its turn is subject to many factors. Although this time sequence of morphs has been verified in some species only (e.g. T. barbatulae Breindl, 1915., T. murmanensis Khan, 1976), it most probably holds true for all of the polymorphic species. The most marked examples of pleomorphism can be drawn from among marine species, e.g. those from skates-T. giganteum, T. rajae, T. gargantua. The freshwater examples are T. granulosum, T. percae and T. remarki.
In fish blood flagellates, a condition similar to trypanosomatids of other host groups exists. Pleomorphism is presumed to be sequential and is regarded to be a phenotypic expression of the genotype (Lumsden, 1976). However, as aptly stated (Bardsley, 1973), only observation of the parasite in its vertebrate host when it is subjected to a complete variety of naturally-occurring conditions and factors can reveal whether it really is monomorphic. In experimental transfers among various hosts (carps, goldfish, gudgeon, pike, Barbus conchonius), varying temperature regimes or study of various stages of infection failed to reveal any true pleomorphism (Lom, 1979).
Bloodstream forms of the initial stages of infection are always rather small and of a regular shape (young stages have commalike or crescent-like shapes). In more advanced infections, bigger, very irregular forms prevail, reflecting in their shape wave-like undulatory movements of the whole body. In the chronic, often long lasting, period of infection, the number of trypanoplasms was reduced; assuming a large size and an irregular shape, sometimes with numerous large bends of the undulating membrane; there was a nucleus with a conspicuous endosome not seen in young stages (Lom, 1979). The length of flagellum relative to the body length may also greatly vary during the cycle, as well as the number of stainable granules in the body.
Given the extreme metaboly of the cell shape, it is difficult to characterize the shape differences in young and advanced infection stages in more precise terms but they are quite conspicuous as are the differences in size. For example, in Trypanoplasma sp. from pikes (T. guerneyorum), the average size of a young form is 20 X 4 μm (excluding flagella), while in the chronic stage form it is 38 × 9 μm.
The large forms of trypanosomes and trypanoplasms found in late infection in the circulating blood were considered to be “adult” forms and were conveniently used as reference stages for taxonomic comparisons (Lom, 1979). While it seems certain that Trypanosoma murmanensis is competent to initiate growth in the vector (Khan, 1978), there is no evidence as to whether it is this or some cryptic, tissue-inhabiting, persisting, stage which is responsible for relapses of parasitaemia.
In this report we describe the morphological polymorphism of trypanosomes and trypanoplasms, which includes the different trypomastigote phenotypes from the blood of different vertebrates of Uttar Pradesh, India.
The survey indicates that pleomorphism amongst fish hosts appears to be a regular feature. However, amongst amphibian and mammalian hosts, monomorphism was dominant suggestive of chronic trypanosomiasis. But even in fish hosts, it is safe to consider that monomorphism dominates (12 species) as compared to dimorphism (6 species) and polymorphism (6 species) as visualized above.
Thanks are expressed to the Uttar Pradesh Council of Agricultural Research (UPCAR), Lucknow for providing financial assistance by awarding a major research project.
- Gupta, N., Pilarczyk, A. (1994).Effect of flagellates on the growth of table carps, Cyprinuscarpioin ponds from Poland. In: Chou et al. (eds.) Proc. Third Asian Fish, AFS Philippinespp: 365-368.
- Woo, P.T.K.(2003). Cryptobia(Trypanoplasma)salmositica and salmonidcryptobiosis.J Fish Dis; 26,627-646.
- Gupta, D.K., Gupta, N., Gangwar, R. (2006).Two new species of Trypanosoma from fresh water fishes (Heteropneustesfossilis and Channapunctatus) from Bareilly India.J Par Dis, 30(1), 58-63.
- Hale, L.J. (1965).Biological LaboratoryData Chapman and Hall Ltd. Meuthuen and Co. Ltd. and FNSpon, London.,147.
- Gupta, N. (1986).Trypanosomacolisi sp. n. from a freshwater fish Colisafasciata Bloch.RivIberParasitol, 46, 1-6.
- Gupta,D.K., Gupta, N.(2010). A haemogram of Clariasbatrachus parasitized by two species of haemoflagellates (TrypanosomabatrachiQadri, 1962 and Trypanoplasmahaematalis n. sp.) as an indicator of infectivity.Rev Fish Sc, 18(2),177-182.
- Laveran, A.,Mesnil, F. (1912).Trypanosomeset Trypanosomiasis. Masson, Paris, 2ndedLavier G. (1936). Sur quelques flagelles intestinaux de poisons marins. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp, 14, 67-68.
- Fantham, H.B. (1919). Some parasitic Protozoa found in South Africa. II. South Afr J Sci,16,185-191.
- Bauer, O.N. (1984). Key to the determination of parasites of fresh water fishes of the USSR.Nauka, Leningrad. 431.
- Minchin, E.A. (1909).Observations on the flagellates parasitic in the blood of freshwater fishes.Proc Zoo. SocLondBiol Sci,2, 30.
- Briendl, V. (1915). Study on the blood parasites of freshwater fishes. Rozpravy Ceske AkademieCisareFrantiskaJosefa pro vedyslovesnostaumeni,18, 1-29.
- Laird, M.(1951).Blood parasites of mammals in New Zealand.Zool Pub Victoria U College, 9, 1-14.
- Khan, R.A. (1976).The life cycle of TrypanosomamurmanensisNikitin.Can J Zool, 54, 1840-1849.
- Keysselitz, G. (1906). Generations und Wirtwechsel von Trypanoplasmaborreli, Laveran und Mesnil. Arch Protistenkd,7, 1-74.
- Robertson, M. (1911).Transmission of flagellates living in the blood of fresh water fishes.Trans R Soc Lond,202, 29-50.
- Kipp, H. (1968).UntersuchungenzumVorkommen, zurArtsspezifitat und Pathogenitat der Cryptbein und Trypanosomenbei der Scheie (Tincatinca L.).Inaugural-dissertation, TierartzlicheFakultat der Ludwig-Maxmilians-Universitat, Munchen.115 pp.
- Bower, S.M., Woo, P.T.K. (1977). Morphology and host specificity of Cryptobiacatostomi n. sp. (Protozoa: Kinetoplastida) from white sucker (Catostomuscommersoni) in southern Ontario. Can J Zool,55,1082-1092.
- Lom, J. (1979). Biologyof trypanosomes and trypanoplasms of fish. In: Biology of the Kinetoplastida Vol. 2.Lumsden, W.H.R. and Evans, D.E. (ed), Academic Press, London/New York/San Francisco, pp 269-337.
- Becker, C.D. (1979). Overstreet RM.Haematozoaof marine fishes from the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Fish Dis,2, 469-479.
- Joshi, B.D. (1979).On the occurrence of trypanosomes in the blood of some freshwater teleosts of Lucknow (UP, India).Proc Indian AcadSci, 88B, 59-63.
- Laveran, A., Mesnil, F. (1907)Trypanosomes and Trypanosomiasis.BailliereLondon, England, p 479-507.
- Tanabe, M. (1925).Studies on the haemoflagellate of the loach, Misgurusanguillicaudatus.Kitasato Arch Exp Med,6, 121-138.
- Dutton, J.E., Todd,J.L., Tobey, E.N. (1907).Concerning certain parasitic protozoa observed in Africa. Part II. Ann Trop Med Parasitol, 1, 287.
- Qadri, S.S. (1955). Themorphology of Trypanosomastriatin.sp.from an Indian fresh water fish. Parasitology, 45, 79-85.
- Qadri, S.S. (1962). On three trypanosomes from fresh water fishes.Parasitology, 52,221-228.
- Becker,C.D. (1967). Trypanosomaoccidentalisn. sp. from fresh water teleosts in Washington State. J Protozool, 14, 153-156.
- Joshi, B.D. (1982).Three new species of hematozoans fromfresh water teleosts.Proc Indian AcadSci, 91B, 397-406.
- Lumsden, W.H.R.,(1976). Evans DA. eds. Biology of Kinetoplastida. Vol. 1, Academic Press, London and New York, 563 pp.
- Bardsley, J.E., Hamsen, R. (1973).The trypanosomes of Anura.AdvParasitol, 11, 1-73.
- Khan, R.A.Longevity ofTrypanosomamurmanensisin themarine leech, Johanssoniasp.Can J Zool, 56, 2061-2063.