Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine 44 7897 074717

Scholarly Peer Review Cosmology Journals

Peer reviewing may be a process where experts from a specific field evaluating the work done by other of an equivalent discipline. referee methods are designed to take care of standards of quality, credibility and performance. during this process, journals forward the acceptable manuscripts submitted for publication to evaluators of comparable competence. These members are qualified and usually of an equivalent profession within the relevant field. referee is usually categorized basing on the sort of activity, field during which it's been submitted. Once the manuscript is submitted to the journal, the editor of the journal would assign the manuscript to an expert within the field. Usually 4-5 reviewers are consulted for this purpose and supported the reviewer workload and interest, a reviewer may accept or reject the invitation. Once manuscript is assigned to a reviewer, the reviewer would be giving their evaluation to the editor indicating all the strong points, weakness and suggestions if possible. This reviewers’ comments are often viewed by author for his or her knowledge on manuscript quality. Since the editors possess are appointed on the idea of their contribution to the sector, they select the simplest persons to complement the manuscript. In referee referee’s evaluation normally includes recommendation to strengthen the manuscript consistent with the newest developments because the reviewer would be an expert within the field concerned followed by the editor views. the ultimate decision would be with the editor of the journal that uses discretion, supported the reviewer’s comments. Normally editors would go because the reviewers suggest and therefore the identity of the reviewers would be kept secret from author as we follow single-blind referee process. Not being conscious of the identity will help editors to require a choice as editor decision are going to be final, no consensus between the reviews and editor is required, and decision are going to be made basing on the editor’s choice and possibility of arguments are often avoided. After the ultimate approval from the editor the accepted manuscripts are going to be published after the galley-proof corrections within the respective journals.

High Impact List of Articles
Conference Proceedings

Relevant Topics in Medical Sciences

Get the App