Journal of Food Microbiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Short Communication - Journal of Food Microbiology (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Unveiling the invisible threat: The role of food microbiology in Controlling Escherichia coli and Campylobacter in the global food chain

Carla Mend*

Department of Food Microbiology, University of São Paulo, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Carla Mend
Department of Food Microbiology
University of São Paulo, Brazil
E-mail: carla.dez@usp.br

Received: 01-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAFMY-25-166533; Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025, PreQC No. AAFMY-25-166533(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025, QC No AAFMY-25-166533; Revised: 24-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAFMY-25-166533(R); Published: 31-Mar-2025, DOI:10.35841/aafmy-9.2.256

Citation: Mend C. Unveiling the invisible threat: The role of food microbiology in Controlling Escherichia coli and Campylobacter in the global food chain. J Food Microbiol. 2025; 9(2):256

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

Introduction

The safety of the global food supply hinges upon our ability to understand and control microbial hazards. Two of the most concerning pathogens in this regard are Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Campylobacter, both of which have been implicated in numerous foodborne outbreaks worldwide. The field of food microbiology plays a central role in identifying, studying, and mitigating the risks posed by these invisible but formidable enemies. As consumer expectations for fresh and ready-to-eat foods rise, so too does the urgency to develop innovative, science-based strategies to minimize contamination and illness [1].

Pathogens like E. coli and Campylobacter are often introduced during food processing or production, and even small amounts can lead to serious illness. Understanding their biology, transmission pathways, and survival mechanisms is vital for public health protection. With the help of modern microbiological techniques and regulatory frameworks, scientists and food safety professionals aim to create a food environment where such pathogens are efficiently detected and controlled before reaching the consumer [2].

Understanding Escherichia coli: Friend and Foe. While many strains of E. coli are harmless inhabitants of the human gut, pathogenic types such as E. coli O157:H7 pose serious threats to food safety. These strains can cause severe gastrointestinal illness, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and even death, especially in vulnerable populations.

Food microbiologists study E. coli’s ability to survive in different food environments, including undercooked meat, raw vegetables, unpasteurized dairy products, and contaminated water. The pathogen’s low infectious dose and resistance to acidic conditions make it particularly dangerous. Techniques such as real-time PCR, multiplex assays, and immunomagnetic separation have enhanced the speed and accuracy of detection, allowing rapid response during outbreaks [2].

Preventative measures in controlling E. coli contamination include hygienic slaughtering practices, routine sanitation of food processing equipment, and strict monitoring of water quality used in irrigation and food washing. Additionally, consumer education on safe cooking and food handling is critical to reducing home-based contamination [3].

The Complexity of Campylobacter Control in Poultry and Beyond. Campylobacter jejuni, the most common species associated with human illness, is a leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis globally. Unlike E. coli, Campylobacter thrives in microaerophilic environments and is highly prevalent in poultry intestines, making raw and undercooked chicken a significant transmission route [4].

Controlling Campylobacter in food production is particularly challenging due to its sensitivity to environmental stresses, which paradoxically enables it to evade standard laboratory culturing and complicates detection. Modern methods such as MALDI-TOF MS, DNA microarrays, and next-generation sequencing are transforming the landscape of Campylobacter research, allowing deeper insights into virulence, antibiotic resistance, and contamination sources [5].

From a food microbiology perspective, effective Campylobacter mitigation starts at the farm level. Biosecurity measures, feed additives, vaccination trials, and bacteriophage applications are being explored to reduce colonization in live birds. At the processing stage, interventions such as chlorinated water washes and surface treatments further help minimize the risk of contamination [6].

The Role of Predictive Microbiology and Risk Assessment. Predictive microbiology is a powerful tool that models how microorganisms behave under various environmental and processing conditions. By simulating the growth or inactivation of E. coli and Campylobacter, researchers can identify critical control points across the food chain and establish science-based standards [7].

For instance, temperature-time combinations for thermal inactivation of E. coli in meat can be optimized using predictive models. Similarly, data on Campylobacter survival in refrigerated poultry can guide safe storage recommendations. These models are central to implementing Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems, ensuring systematic monitoring and intervention at every stage of food production [8].

Food microbiologists also contribute to Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA), a structured process that estimates the probability and severity of foodborne illness. By combining laboratory data, exposure assessments, and epidemiological insights, QMRAs inform regulatory decisions and consumer advisories. Emerging Technologies in Food Microbiology. The field of food microbiology is being revolutionized by technological advancements that enhance our ability to detect, trace, and understand foodborne pathogens. Biosensors, microfluidic devices, and CRISPR-based diagnostics are offering rapid, on-site testing possibilities with high specificity. Moreover, metagenomic approaches are allowing scientists to analyze entire microbial communities within food and production environments, revealing interactions that may promote or suppress pathogen survival.

These innovations are particularly useful in tracking antimicrobial-resistant strains of E. coli and Campylobacter, which are increasingly reported worldwide. Surveillance programs like WHO’s Global Foodborne Infections Network (GFN) rely on data from microbiologists to monitor resistance trends and identify emerging threats [10].

Conclusion

In a world of expanding food systems and increasing microbial threats, food microbiology remains a frontline discipline in the battle against Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. Through the integration of cutting-edge detection tools, risk assessment frameworks, and cross-sector collaboration, food safety professionals are better equipped than ever to ensure the microbiological integrity of what we eat. Continuous research, education, and policy innovation will be essential to confront evolving pathogens and safeguard the health of global populations.

References

  1. Thomas I, Carter JA. Occupational hazards of anaesthesia.Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2006;6(5):182-7.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Deisenhammer S, Radon K, Nowak D, et al. Needle stick injuries during medical training .J Hosp Infect. 2006;63(3):263-7.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Trim JC, Elliott TS. A review of sharps injuries and preventive strategies.J Hosp Infect. 2003;53(4):237-42.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Greene ES, Berry AJ, Arnold WP, et al. Percutaneous injuries in anaesthesia personnel.Anesth Analg. 1996;83(2):273-8.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Kristensen MS, Sloth E, Jensen TK. Relationship between anesthetic procedure and contact of anesthesia personnel with patient body fluids.Anesthesiology. 1990;73(4):619-24.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma.N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2638-50.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Rabiner EA, Beaver J, Makwana A, et al. Pharmacological differentiation of opioid receptor antagonists by molecular and functional imaging of target occupancy and food reward-related brain activation in humans.Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16(8):826-35.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Hendrickx JF, Eger EI, Sonner JM, et al. Is synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility.Anesth Analg. 2008;107(2):494-506.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Stein C. The control of pain in peripheral tissue by opioids.N Engl J Med. 1995;332(25):1685-90.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Becerra L, Harter K, Gonzalez RG, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measures of the effects of morphine on central nervous system circuitry in opioid-naive healthy volunteers.Anesth Analg. 2006;103(1):208-16.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App