Journal of Food Science and Nutrition

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Journal of Food Science and Nutrition (2022) Volume 5, Issue 5

Hurdle-based innovations of ultrasound in food preservation.

Dalal Alrubaishi*

Department of Food Quality and Control, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, United States

*Corresponding Author:
Dalal Alrubaishi
Department of Food Quality and Control
University of Central Missouri
United States

Received: 30-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. AAJFSN-22-64428; Editor assigned: 3-May-2022, PreQC No. AAJFSN-22-64428 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-May-2022, QC No. AAJFSN-22-64428; Revised: 21-May-2022, Manuscript No. AAJFSN-22-64428; Published: 28-May-2022, DOI:10.35841/aajfsn-5.5.124

Citation: Alrubaishi D. Hurdle based innovations of ultrasound in food preservation. J Food Sci Nutr. 2022; 5(5):124

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Science and Nutrition


It is being investigated whether ultrasound can be used in conjunction with existing or new food preservation techniques in order to increase the scope of ultrasound's application in the food industry. The objective of this survey was to investigate the most generally utilized customary food protection ultrasound mix advancements, known as obstacle innovation. Utilizing ultrasound-based obstacle mixes will be inspected for their benefits, detriments, and expected future difficulties. To represent headways in food protection innovation utilizing ultrasound-based obstacles since the turn of the thousand years, the area of the review and the kind of diary were not thought about to incorporate all suitable wellsprings of ability. Food conservation innovations in light of ultrasound and sanitation examination might help. In spite of broad investigation into various mixes of this new innovation with conventional obstacles, future exploration, advancement, execution, and commercialization difficulties will be various


Cavitation, Food hurdle technology preservation, Ultrasound.


Since consumers want fresher food that is also microbiologically safe, non-thermal methods of microorganism and enzyme inactivation have been developed to meet this demand. Involving extreme focus ultrasound for food protection has aroused non-warm tech organizations' advantage on account of the lower cost and more prominent accessibility; it is currently a more alluring choice in light of the financial aspects of the application. The therapy's expanded ultrasonic power and longer handling time are to be faulted for the increase in temperature. Because of cavitation bubble heat move, medium temperature slowly increases and cavitation's effect is reduced interestingly, huge microbial inactivation requires longer treatment times and higher power levels. Because of the troubles of inactivating bacterial spores with this method, it is just utilized for food varieties with no impact on food quality because of enzymatic responses. It was found that ultrasonic innovation alone was not sufficiently adequate to inactivate countless bacterial species in view of its productivity in specific situations, and in this manner wouldn't be powerful as a technique for food conservation alone, as indicated by the FDA in the United States [1].

On the basis of what we know, researchers are looking into combining ultrasound with traditional or emerging food preservation technologies in order to expand ultrasound's application in the food industry. As a result, the study's objective was to look into the most widely used ultrasound hurdle combination technologies for food preservation. Ultrasound-based hurdle combinations that are currently being used in research will be evaluated for their advantages, disadvantages, and possible future challenges.

Most commonly used ultrasound-based hurdle combinations

When microorganisms are subjected to a stressor other than heat, such as ultrasound, permanent or sublethal damage can result [1]. Moreover, microorganisms can endure inactivation medicines on the off chance that killing specialists are not accessible to microbial cells. Numerous conventional protection factors, as well as arising factors joined with different obstacles, muddle and dark the physiological reaction of microbial cells [2].

Utilizing nonthermal inactivation specialists with gentle handling can increment item wellbeing without expanding timeframe of realistic usability or increment both security and time span of usability similarly, as indicated by the discoveries [3]. It is feasible to upgrade ultrasonic inactivation using extra stressors, like high intensity (thermosonication), high tension (manosonication), or both (manothermosonication) [4,5].


In conclusion, the development of ultrasound-based food preservation technologies, as well as food safety research, may be beneficial. This technology was developed initially for food processing, but commercial applications are now being considered. As recently expressed, the variables that impact ultrasound adequacy in different cycles are likewise obscure. Prior to considering ultrasonic medicines, food makers should decide if the drawn out benefits offset the expenses of changing over and keeping up with handling gear. To sum up, more examination is required before ultrasound-based innovations can be viewed as a suitable trade for current food conservation rehearses.


  1. Mason TJ, Paniwnyk L, Chemat F. Ultrasound as a preservation technology. In Food preservation techniques 2003.Elsevier.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  3. Raso J, Barbosa-Cánovas GV. Nonthermal preservation of foods using combined processing techniques. '
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

  5. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Weiss J. Ultrasound technologies for food and bioprocessing. Feng H, editor. New York: Springer; 2011.
  6. Ananta E, Voigt D, Zenker M, et al. Cellular injuries upon exposure of Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus rhamnosus to high-intensity ultrasound. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005;(2):271-8.
  7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

  8. Guerrero S, Tognon M, Alzamora SM. Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the combined action of ultrasound and low weight chitosan. Food Control. 2005 ;16(2):131-9.
  9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross re

Get the App