Journal of Food Microbiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Rapid Communication - Journal of Food Microbiology (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Combatting foodborne pathogens: The role of food microbiology in managing salmonella and listeria monocytogenes

John Smithson*

Department of Food Safety, University of Melbourne, Australia

*Corresponding Author:
John Smithson
Department of Food Safety
University of Melbourne, Australia
E-mail: john.smithson@unimelb

Received: 01-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAFMY-25-166532; Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025, PreQC No. AAFMY-25-166532(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025, QC No AAFMY-25-166532; Revised: 24-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAFMY-25-166532(R); Published: 31-Mar-2025, DOI:10.35841/aafmy-9.2.255

Citation: Smithson J. Combatting foodborne pathogens: The role of food microbiology in managing salmonella and listeria monocytogenes. J Food Microbiol. 2025; 9(2):255

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

Introduction

The global food supply system is a dynamic and complex network, vulnerable to microbial contamination at multiple points—from production to consumption. Among the most persistent threats are Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes, two pathogens that continue to challenge food safety standards worldwide. As the burden of foodborne illnesses rises and consumer demand for fresh, minimally processed foods grows, the role of food microbiology becomes increasingly vital. This scientific discipline offers the tools and techniques necessary to understand, monitor, and control microbial risks in the food chain [1].

Food microbiology’s evolving landscape provides crucial insights into the behavior of pathogens in diverse food matrices and environments. With advances in genomic sequencing, predictive modeling, and microbial ecology, food safety strategies are becoming more sophisticated. In this context, understanding how Salmonella and Listeria operate—and how they can be mitigated—remains a cornerstone of modern food protection efforts [2].

The Threat of Salmonella in Global Food Systems. Salmonella spp. are among the most frequently reported causes of foodborne disease outbreaks globally. These gram-negative bacteria often contaminate a wide range of food products, including poultry, eggs, dairy, and fresh produce. The organism’s ability to survive under various stress conditions and form biofilms on food contact surfaces complicates eradication efforts [3].

Food microbiologists have identified specific serotypes, such as Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Typhimurium, as dominant culprits in human infection. These serotypes have evolved mechanisms to resist acidic environments, refrigeration, and certain sanitizing agents, making conventional control measures less effective. Advanced microbial detection techniques, including PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS), are now employed to track contamination routes and implement timely recalls [4].

Mitigation strategies against Salmonella involve a combination of good manufacturing practices (GMP), hygiene control, thermal processing, and increasingly, the use of bacteriophages and probiotics as biological interventions. Studies in food microbiology continue to explore how the food matrix influences Salmonella’s survival and growth, especially in low-moisture foods such as spices and powdered infant formula [5].

Listeria monocytogenes: A Stealthy Killer in Cold Environments. While Salmonella is more widespread, Listeria monocytogenes poses a particularly dangerous threat to immunocompromised individuals, pregnant women, and the elderly. Known for its ability to grow at refrigeration temperatures, Listeria has been responsible for some of the deadliest outbreaks in recent decades, often linked to ready-to-eat meats, unpasteurized dairy, and processed vegetables [6].

What makes Listeria so insidious is its capacity to persist in food production environments, especially in niches that are hard to sanitize, such as drains and food contact surfaces. Food microbiologists emphasize routine environmental monitoring and swab testing to detect and eliminate harborage sites [7].

The scientific community has also explored the genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes, identifying virulence factors such as inlA and hly, which play a role in epithelial cell invasion and immune evasion. Molecular subtyping techniques, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), have been instrumental in outbreak investigation and source attribution [8].

Microbial Risk Assessment and Predictive Microbiology. The discipline of food microbiology extends beyond detection—it plays a vital role in microbial risk assessment. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) models estimate the likelihood of illness from consuming contaminated food, integrating data on pathogen prevalence, growth kinetics, and human exposure. In the context of Salmonella and Listeria, predictive microbiology tools like ComBase and Pathogen Modeling Program (PMP) simulate microbial behavior under various processing and storage conditions. These models support risk managers in designing effective control strategies and critical limits for safety protocols such as Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) [9].

Moreover, hurdle technology combining multiple microbial control techniques such as pH, temperature, and water activity is increasingly applied to inhibit pathogen growth without compromising product quality. Food microbiologists are central to developing these integrated strategies. The Future of Food Microbiology in Pathogen Control. Ongoing research in food microbiology continues to shape the way the food industry approaches microbial hazards. Novel detection methods, including biosensors and CRISPR-based diagnostics, promise real-time pathogen monitoring with high specificity. In addition, the growing field of metagenomics is providing insights into the microbial ecosystems of food environments, uncovering interactions that either suppress or promote pathogen survival.

In parallel, regulatory agencies such as FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand) and Codex Alimentarius are strengthening microbiological criteria based on scientific evidence. Collaborative global surveillance systems are essential for rapid response to emerging threats, especially in a world where food is shipped across continents daily.

Education and capacity building also remain critical. Food safety professionals and microbiologists must be well-versed in both classical microbiological techniques and modern genomic tools to address the evolving complexity of microbial contamination in food systems [10].

Conclusion

The persistent challenge of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes in the food supply underscores the essential role of food microbiology in safeguarding public health. Through detailed understanding of pathogen behavior, advanced detection methods, and proactive risk management, food microbiologists contribute to robust safety systems that protect consumers worldwide. With science driving innovation, the fight against foodborne pathogens becomes increasingly precise and powerful. As global food systems continue to expand, the discipline of food microbiology remains central to ensuring that food is not only abundant, but safe.

References

  1. Munakata Y, Casey BJ, Diamond A. Developmental cognitive neuroscience: progress and potential. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2004;8(3):122-8.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Westermann G, Sirois S, Shultz TR, et al. Modeling developmental cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(5):227-32.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Karmiloff?Smith A. Crucial differences between developmental cognitive neuroscience and adult neuropsychology. Developmental neuropsychology. 1997;13(4):513-24.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Brod G, Werkle-Bergner M, Shing YL. The influence of prior knowledge on memory: a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. 2013;7:139.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Colombo J. On the neural mechanisms underlying developmental and individual differences in visual fixation in infancy: Two hypotheses. Developmental Review. 1995;15(2):97-135.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public health reports. 2014;129:5-8.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health promotion international. 1991 ;6(3):217-28.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Saadi A, Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S, et al. Racial disparities in neurologic health care access and utilization in the United States. Neurology. 2017;88(24):2268-75.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Gee GC, Ford CL. Structural racism and health inequities: Old issues, New Directions1. Du Bois review: social science research on race. 2011;8(1):115-32.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, et al. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:97–107.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App