Assessing the Effectiveness of Government Policies in Achieving Food Security Goals

Adesola Adejumo

doi:10.35841/AAJFSN-8.2.286

Short Communication - Journal of Food Science and Nutrition (2025) Volume 8, Issue 2

Assessing the Effectiveness of Government Policies in Achieving Food Security Goals

Adesola Adejumo ^*

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author:: Adesola Adejumo
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
E-mail: adesolade@gmail.com

Received: 01-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFSN-25-165446; Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2025, PreQC No. AAJFSN-25-165446; Reviewed:12-Apr-2025, QC No. AAJFSN-25-165446; Revised:20-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFSN-25-165446 (R); Published:28-Apr-2025, DOI:10.35841/ aajfsn-8.2.286

Citation: Adejumo A. Assessing the effectiveness of government policies in achieving food security goals. J Food Sci Nutr. 2025; 8(2):286

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Science and Nutrition

Introduction

Food security defined by the FAO as having physical, social, and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food at all times is a fundamental human right and a critical aspect of national and global development. Governments around the world have implemented various policies and programs to ensure food availability, improve access, stabilize food prices, and promote sustainable agriculture. However, the effectiveness of these policies varies significantly across regions and socio-political contexts. This article explores how government initiatives have performed in achieving food security goals and identifies key factors influencing their success or failure [1].

Food security is built on four pillars: Adequate food production and supply, Economic and physical ability to obtain food, Proper use of food for nutritional well-being, Consistent food supply over time. Effective government policies must address all these aspects to sustainably eliminate hunger and malnutrition [2].

Several countries have demonstrated notable progress in food security due to targeted policy interventions. For example: Launched in 2003, this comprehensive strategy combined conditional cash transfers (Bolsa Família), food distribution, and nutrition education. As a result, Brazil significantly reduced extreme poverty and child malnutrition [3].

Enacted in 2013, NFSA provides subsidized food grains to nearly two-thirds of India’s population. Combined with the Public Distribution System (PDS), it helped reduce hunger, although issues with leakage and inefficiencies remain [4].

This public works-based cash and food transfer program helps vulnerable households during food shortages, improving food access and resilience. Despite some successes, many policies fall short due to: Subsidies or food aid may not reach the most vulnerable populations due to corruption, exclusion errors, or weak administrative systems [5].

Food security policies often operate in silos. Without coordination across sectors agriculture, health, education outcomes may be suboptimal. In conflict-affected areas such as Yemen or South Sudan, government efforts are disrupted, leading to severe food insecurity [6].

Governments struggle to adapt agricultural policies to shifting weather patterns, affecting food production and availability. Agricultural support policies—including fertilizer subsidies, irrigation programs, and rural credit—are intended to enhance productivity [7].

For example, Malawi’s Farm Input Subsidy Program initially boosted maize production and reduced hunger. However, without environmental sustainability and market access, such benefits may not be long-term. Moreover, in many high-income countries, agricultural subsidies distort trade and undermine food security in developing countries by making local production less competitive [8].

Governments are increasingly incorporating digital technologies in food security strategies. Mobile platforms for price updates, e-vouchers, and GPS monitoring of food aid are improving efficiency. Rwanda, for example, has used digital tools for farmer registration and subsidy distribution, helping smallholders gain better access to inputs and markets [9].

Effectiveness is often gauged through indicators such as: Prevalence of undernourishment, Stunting and wasting rates in children, Household food consumption scores, Agricultural productivity and rural income levels. However, data availability and quality remain challenges, particularly in low-income regions. Independent monitoring, transparency, and participatory evaluation can improve accountability [10].

Conclusion

Government policies play a vital role in achieving food security, yet their effectiveness depends on sound design, efficient implementation, and adaptability to local conditions. While successful cases demonstrate that political will, multi-sectoral coordination, and social protection programs can yield meaningful progress, challenges persist—particularly in targeting, governance, and climate resilience. Going forward, governments must prioritize inclusive, transparent, and adaptive strategies supported by evidence-based policymaking and community engagement to realize sustainable food security for all.