Conference Proceedings - Journal of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing (2021) Volume 4, Issue 2
            Accuracy of emergency and critical care residents reading emergency cranial CT scan
            mergency   department   (ED)   arecrucial   entry   points   to healthcare  services  and  usually  overcrowded.  Cases  in  ED  are time  essence  and  emergency  physician  (EP)  must  act  quickly according  to  his  ordered  and  related  investigations.  Computed tomography  (CT)  frequently  used  in  the  differential  diagnosis of  intracranial  pathology  during  ED  visits.  Only  39%  of  ED have access to radiologist’s interpretation of all images within hours of image acquisition. The diagnostic error from failure to detect  an abnormal radiography  in  a timely  manner  may result in  poor  patient  outcomes  in  the  emergency  setting. The  ability to select and interpret diagnostic imaging is an integral skill for all    EP.    The    Academic    Emergency    Medicine    consensus conference highlighted that the assessment of an EP diagnostic reasoning   skills   is   vital   to   effective   training   and   patient safety.EM  is  young  field  of  study  in  Ethiopia.  Very  little  is known  about  EMCC  residents’  accuracy  in  interpretation  of emergency  cranial  CT  scans.  This  study  aimed  in  determining the  accuracy   of   emergency   cranial  CT  reading  of  EMCC residents  of  Addis  Ababa  University&  St  Paul  Millennium Medical    College    as    compared    to    neuroradiologist.    A prospective   cross-sectional   study   employed   on   the   EMCC residents of AAU, and St’ Paul MMC. Data collected from May 2019-June  2019  by  using  structured  questionnaires  as  well  as through  radiant  view  software  by  displaying  the  full  slices  of the cranial CT scans. Forty two EMCC residents were enrolled in this study. 24 from Addis Ababa University and 18  from St Paul  Millennium  Medical  College.  Over  all  accuracy  rate  in interpretation   cranial   CT   scans   was   57.6%.   The   overall discrepancy  rate  was  very  high  (42.4%)  compared  to  prior studies.  There  is  moderate  agreement  between  EMCC  and neuroradiologist (kappa 0.5)
            Author(s): Nathan Muluberhan                        
						 Abstract
      
            
      PDF