Journal of Food Nutrition and Health

Reach Us +44-2476101207

Research Article - Journal of Food Nutrition and Health (2019) Volume 2, Issue 1

Epidemiology of salmonella and its serotypes in human, food animals, foods of animal origin, animal feed and environment.

*Corresponding Author:
Fisseha Mengstie Tegegne
College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Bonga University, Bonga, Ethiopia
Tel: +251 913 851010
E-mail:[email protected]

Accepted date: February 13, 2019

Citation: Tegegne FM. Epidemiology of salmonella and its serotypes in human, food animals, foods of animal origin, animal feed and environment. J Food Nutr Health. 2019;2(1):7-14.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Nutrition and Health


The present review was undertaken to determine the epidemiology of Salmonella serotypes from food animals, food of animal origin, environment, animal feed, water and humans. For this a number of sensitive phenotypic and genotypic detection methods for Salmonella were reviewed. In general, a total of 34,051 samples for quantitative analysis were analyzed. The review result revealed overall 5,738 (16.9%) samples were positive for Salmonella. Of these, 194 serotypes; and 7 Salmonella Enteritidis and 18 Typhimurium phage types were isolated. With regard to examined sample types, of 7027 Poultry, 1888 (26.9%), of 1895 poultry and poultry products, 499 (26.3%), of 170 poultry environment, 100 (58.8%), of 268 chicken meat, 115 (42.9%), of 600 turkey flesh, 62 (10.3%), Of 7744 pig, 1369 (17.7%), of 318 pork meat, 126 (39.6%), of 1923 swine and swine farm environment, 151 (7.9%), of 4709 cattle, 435 (9.2%), of 947 beef, 172 (18.2%), of 50 calf, 35 (70.0%), of 1132 human, 128 (11.3%), of 1536 camel, 238 (15.5%), of 2839 sheep and goat, 56 (2.0%), of 292 mutton, 39 (13.4%), of 200 water, 37 (18.5%), of 2058 animal feeds, 257 (12.5%), of 190 cottage cheese, 4 (2.1%), of 25 Hedgehog, 24 (96.0%) and of 128 fish meat, 3 (2.3%) were infected with Salmonella. These revealed the comparative differential contamination rate among hosts and samples. Salmonella Typhimurium (16.0%), Enteritidis (12.8%) and Derby (9.9%) are dominant serotypes. Large scale production of minimally processed and ready to eat products, trading live infected animals or pets, antimicrobial growth promoters and treatment, unhygienic carcasses evisceration and storage of manure inside of the farm were associated risk factors. In conclusion, Salmonella is widely distributed with diverse hosts, serotype and environmental niche. Therefore, early detection of Salmonella relevant for investigating source of infection and implementing prevention and control measures


Detection tools, Epidemiology, Food animals, Food of animals origin, Human, Salmonella, Serotypes.


Salmonella enterica is a major pathogen in humans as well as in animals [1]. Salmonella comprises greater than 2,500 identified serotypes [2]. They are widely dispersed in nature and are common inhabitants of the intestinal tract of domesticated and wild mammals, reptiles, birds, and even insects. The highly adapted S. enterica Typhi causes typhoid fever only in humans, whereas other serotypes, namely nontyphoid Salmonella serotypes, can cause a wide spectrum of diseases in humans and animals [1].

Foodborne diseases caused by non-typhoid Salmonella represent an important public health problem [3] causing substantial morbidity and mortality, and thus also has significant economic impact worldwide [4] including in industrialized countries [5]. In the 1980s and 1990s, two Salmonella serotypes in particular, S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium, became major causes of food borne illness in Western countries as well as in countries that currently are adopting industrialized food production. By contrast, in most developing countries a more diverse range of Salmonella serotypes are found in humans. Salmonella continues to be the most frequent cause of bacterial food borne disease outbreaks [5].

Non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. are zoonotic agents and foods of animal origin are the main sources for their transmission [3]. Most clinical infections of humans are transmitted from healthy carrier animals to humans through food [5]. Fecal or intestinal contamination of carcasses is the principal source of human food-borne infections. The exception is when Salmonella is directly transmitted into the food product [6].

Salmonella enteritidis has the unique capacity of being able to infect the ovaries of chickens without causing symptoms. Thereby the bacterium may enter the egg internally and thus both spread to the offspring and transmit to consumers. Salmonella may multiply within the egg or in the prepared dish before consumption, thus sometimes growing to high numbers, and increasing the potential for causing disease [5].

Several large outbreaks in humans have been traced back to contaminated animal feed [7]. However, Salmonella is also spread by non-heat-treated animal products [6]. In most industrialized countries, S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium are the two most frequently occurring serotypes. In Europe, they together constitute more than 80% of all serotypes. S. enteritidis is the most frequent serotype generally responsible for approximately two-thirds of the infections in Europe. In the US, S. typhimurium is generally more frequent than S. enteritidis and their collective share is approximately 35 to 40% of all infections [5].

Animals infected after exposure to infected animals, feed or environmental conditions excrete Salmonella bacteria by fecal shedding [6]. Contamination of animal feed before arrival at and while on the farm contributes to infection and colonization of food producing animals with these pathogens [7]. Salmonella infected food producing animals excrete Salmonella bacteria in large numbers, sometimes intermittently during their entire economic life. Excreted bacteria infect neighboring animals on the farm and contamination of the environment takes place, with infections being transmitted to rodents and other wild fauna. When moved, the Salmonella infected animals are effective at introducing the infection into their new holdings [6].

Salmonella is spread by the trade of live animals within and between countries. Salmonella is additionally spread between countries by humans as a result of food-borne infections acquired abroad. The overall importance of this route of transmission may reflect the prevalence of Salmonella contamination of food (including food of animal origin) in a particular country [6]. Large-scale production of animals and crops and breeding pyramids of specially bred, genetically similar food animals are vulnerable to salmonella infections. Intensified farming may make animals more prone to infections and trade with live animals can, if they become infected, efficiently distribute the infections from one country to another. New types of foods, for instance the increased use of ready-to-eat foods and new production systems may sometimes also be liable to contamination [5].

Salmonella bacteria can survive for long periods in the environment, although in general no significant multiplication occurs. Salmonella infections in wild fauna, such as rodents, are usually secondary to the infection of farm animals, even though infection cycles may continue independently of any continuous input of Salmonella bacteria from farm animals [6].

In Ethiopia, several factors including under and malnutrition, HIVAIDS, the unhygienic living circumstances and the close relations between humans and animals may substantially contribute to the occurrence of Salmonellosis [8]. The existing scattered efforts of research lack depth, coordination, evaluation, compilation and documentation of the scantly generated information. The depth and width of study on Salmonella varies among countries and among animal species. Research work is utterly wasted unless it is brought to public notice in some form. Therefore, the present review was conducted with the objectives of systematically review the prevalence and distribution of different Salmonella serotypes in different hosts, foods of animal origin and environment by using meta-analytical methods and recognize the major risk factors.

Salmonella Detection Methods for Epidemiological Monitoring

There are over 2,500 identified serotypes of Salmonella. Most of them share a high level of genetic similarity. Because of this genetic similarity the Salmonella genus is now divided into two species, S. enteric and S. bongori. Greater than 99% of the serotypes are grouped into the species S. enteric [9].

Phenotypic method

Outbreak investigations and tracing of zoonotic bacteria among livestock and from livestock via food to man can be performed by the use of bacterial typing methods [10].


Salmonella serotyping plays an essential role in determining species and subspecies. It is initial step for routine diagnosis of strains and this can be done with commercially available poly and monovalent antisera. Of the Salmonella, S. enterica and S. bongori, over 99% of serotypes are grouped into species S. enterica, and nearly 60% of them belong to the subspecies enterica (subspecies I) [9]. Serotyping has a wide acceptance as a method to differentiate Salmonella strains, and it is an important tool in public health. This traditional serotyping method has many limitations. It is based on the use of expensive antisera; also the procedure is time consuming, requires welltrained technicians, and some isolates are not typeable [4], but it is highly discriminative [10].

• Serotyping by slide agglutination (Kauffmann-White-Le Minor scheme: The genus Salmonella has been identified and classified to have over 2500 serovars by Kaufmann- White scheme. This technique remains as a paramount for differentiating members of the Salmonella genus following biochemical identification. In this method, a series of antisera was used to detect different antigenic determinants such as somatic (O), capsular (Vi) and flagellar (H) antigens on the surface of bacterial cell. The O antigen is the saccharidic component of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposed on the bacterial surface [11]. Its reactivity toward specific antisera forms the basis of the Salmonella serotyping scheme [12].

• False-positive reactions may occur as a result of weak, nonspecific agglutination [13,14] Autoagglutination and loss of antigen expression, such as that observed with rough, non-motile, and mucoid strains, may occasionally lead to strain untypeability, but these strains typically have little epidemiological significance. The method is intended neither to provide a sensitive fingerprint (e.g., for tracing during an outbreak) nor to define phyletic relationships [13]. It requires the use of over 150 specific antisera and carefully trained personnel. It is still defined as the reference method and is commonly used as an initial screening, followed by molecular subtyping to identify outbreak-related strains.

• Serotyping by antibody microarrays: In this assay, the antibody-antigen reactions are conducted on a micro volume scale on slides following fluorescent labelling of the investigated Salmonella strain. Detection is carried out with a common fluorescence scanner. The main advantages of antibody microarray-based serotyping over traditional serotyping are reduced analysis time, standardized agglutination detection, and simultaneous detection of the O and H antigens [13].


Phage typing is used to discriminate between Salmonella strains belonging to the same serotype. The advantage of phage typing resides in the simplicity of its implementation, which requires only basic laboratory equipment [13]. This typing method has proven to be epidemiologically valuable in strains differentiation within a particular Salmonella serotype. In this subtyping approach, Salmonella strains are separated into different phage types based on their reactivity against a set of serotype specific typing phages. This technique has been developed for some relevant serotypes [10].

Antimicrobial resistance typing

This typing technique determines the profile of resistance of a microbial strain towards a panel of an antimicrobial agent. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is usually carried out to determine which antibiotic is effective in treating bacterial infection in vivo. It has been quite commonly used in the past as subtyping method to determine correlation between isolates. Nowadays, antimicrobial resistance typing is less used frequently for this specific purpose. This technique is cheap and does not require specific equipment and reagents like phagetyping. Antibiogram has poor discriminatory power because antimicrobial resistance is under selective pressure and often is associated with mobile genetic elements and strains which are epidemiologically related may have different antimicrobial susceptibility due to loss of plasmids or the acquisition of new genetic material [11].

Genotypic Methods

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis: Historically, Pulsed field gel electrophoresis [PFGE] is one of the earliest molecular DNA subtyping systems, showing the pattern of fingerprinting for Salmonella strains which is suitable as an epidemiological tool for investigating outbreaks. Moreover, it is considered as a gold standard for molecular typing of Salmonella and many other bacterial pathogens. The technique is useful for fingerprinting strains in outbreak situations and is relatively inexpensive to perform [13]. However, PFGE is time-consuming and laborintensive and does not display equal sensitivity with different serovars [14].

Polymerase Chain Reaction: PCR offers many advantages compared to conventional culture-based detection methods regarding sensitivity, specificity, speed, and possibility of automatization. The PCR-based detection methods in food commonly employ a pre enrichment step combined with subsequent PCR detection. The majority of these PCR assays amplify part of the invA gene, encoding a protein involved in the invasion of epithelial cells, however, it has been shown that invA is lacking in some strains. The major advantage of PCRbased detection of a food borne pathogen like Salmonella is the reduction in time of analysis [5].

Methods used in literature searching and review

Eligibility criteria

Journals are eligible for quantitative syntheses if:

(i) Their objective was not serotype specific.

(ii) It provided the sample size.

(iii) It described the microbiological and serotyping methods.

(iv) It provided the numbers of isolates.

Other studies with relevant information on serotypes, typhoidal and non-typhoid isolates were included in the reviewing.

Literature search strategies: Literature searching is by using lists of references of articles and by using Google scholars. Additional searches were done by using key words like Salmonella prevalence rate, Salmonella incidence, antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella serotypes, Salmonella in different hosts (human, animals, foods of animal origin, contamination in animal feeds) and environment.

Selection of Studies

Initially articles with titles and abstracts that were not relevant to the outcomes of interests (The outcomes of interest is the prevalence and distribution of Salmonella serotypes isolated from different types of human food originated from animals and animal feeds such as swine, poultry, beef, mutton, camel, fish meat, cottage cheese, and water and equine, west and sewages, environment, including samples from Humans etc.,) were excluded. The full texts of all articles screened for eligibility. Of the screened articles, duplicates and articles that did not meet the eligibility criteria were excluded.

Detection methods used by the journals and data extraction

The different types of the journals used different detection methods (Table 1). The majority of the journals used Slide agglutination test (Kauffman White scheme). Regarding the type of data’s extracted during the present review, the first author, year of publication, year of study, location, sample size, types and number of samples, microbiological methods, Serotyping methods, number of Salmonella positive samples, serotypes, risk factors and other relevant information from the eligible studies were collected.

Detection methods No. of Journal Articles
For quantitative Data analysis For qualitative Data analysis
Microtiter agglutination test according to Kauffmann and White scheme 2 14
Slide agglutination test (Kauffman White scheme) 25
Microtiter and slide agglutination test according to Kauffmann and White scheme 5
Pulse field gel electrophoresis 1
Total 33 14
Grand Total journals 47

Table 1: Detection methods for epidemiological monitoring used by reviewed journal articles.

Data Analysis

The data were stratified on the basis of feel of relative homogeneity [15] as Salmonella serotypes in different sources. The Salmonella serotype data were further grouped by sample type. Finally Meta-analysis was performed.


Eligible and excluded studies

A total of 213 studies were found of which 166 were excluded and 47 studies were considered eligible for qualitative and quantitative syntheses based on the stated criteria.

Characteristics of the eligible studies

The studies were conducted between the years 2000 to 2014 (except three which were studied between 1997 to 1999) in different countries. These are Ethiopia, United States, Vietnam, China, Spain, Belgium, India, Japan, Iran, Morocco, Nigeria, Denmark, Great Britain, Egypt, Senegal, Burkina Faso and Brazil. Regarding the samples distribution, different types of food of animal origin and other sources namely, poultry, beef, sheep and goat, camel meat, fish meat, cottage cheese, swine, water, environmental swab, animal feed and human were included in the study.

The grouping of samples based on their sources indicated that, 1895 from poultry and poultry products, 170 from poultry farm environment, 7027 from poultry (Poultry, Broiler, Chicken, Duck), 268 from chicken meat, 600 from turkey flesh, 7744 from pig, 318 from pork meat, 1923 from swine and swine farm environment, 4709 from cattle, 947 from beef, 50 from calf, 1132 from human, 1536 from camel, 212 from mutton, 200 from water, 2058 from animal feed, 190 from cottage cheese, 25 from Hedgehog, 128 from fish meat, 600 from goat, 1677 from sheep, 642 from sheep and goat were considered for quantitative syntheses.

Salmonella isolates prevalence and distribution in different sources

Of 34051 samples examined, 5738 (16.9%) Salmonella isolates were collected from different sample sources. Salmonella was isolated from twenty three different types of samples. Thus, the highest Salmonella isolates were recovered from hedgehog (96.0%) followed by calf (70%) and poultry farm environment (58.8%). The isolates obtained from Chicken meat (42.9%), pork meat (39.6%) and poultry (26.9%) were also highest among other sources (Table 2).

Sources No. of samples Positive Prevalence (%)
Animal feed 2058 257 12.5
Beef 947 172 18.2
Calf 50 35 70.0
Camel 1536 238 15.5
Cattle 4709 435 9.2
Chicken meat 268 115 42.9
Cottage cheese 190 4 2.1
Fish meat 128 3 2.3
Goat 600 4 0.7
Hedgehog 25 24 96.0
Human 1132 128 11.3
Mutton 212 23 10.8
Pig 7744 1369 17.7
Pork meat 318 126 39.6
Poultry (Poultry, Broiler, Chicken, Duck) 7027 1888 26.9
Poultry and poultry products 1895 499 26.3
Poultry farm environment 170 100 58.8
Sheep 1677 35 2.1
Sheep and goat 642 33 5.1
Swine and swine farm environment 1923 151 7.9
Turkey flesh 600 62 10.3
Water 200 37 18.5
Over all 34051 5738 16.9

Table 2: Prevalence of salmonella isolates in different sources.

Prevalence of dominantly isolated salmonella serotypes and phage types

Out of 5,738 Salmonella positive samples, 194 different serotypes and 25 phage types of Salmonella thyphimurium and enteritidis were isolated. Among the isolated serotypes, Typhimurium (16.0%) was the dominant followed by others like Enteritidis (12.8%), Derby (9.9%), Anatum (5.2%), Saintpaul (3.5%), Braenderup (3.4%), Hadar (3.1%) and Infantis (3.0%). The dominant isolated Salmonella serotypes are indicated in (Table 3). The rest of the isolates are not included in the table as they had below 1% prevalence.

Compound Diagnostic ions (m/z) Quantification ion (m/z) Retention time, min
Heptachlor epoxide 353 272 237 353 22.150
Bifenthrin 181 165 166 181 18.010
Cypermethrin 207 77 181 207 20.511
Endosulfan sulfate 272 389 274 272 17.123
Chlorpyrifos 199 97 197 97 13.836
Fenitrothion 125 109 277 109 13.341
Malathion 125 93 173 121 13.621
Methidathion 145 85 125 145 14.648
Methyl parathion 109 263 125 263 12.950
Profenofos 208 97 139 208 12.475
O, P-DDT 235 165 236 235 16.320

Table 3: Prevalence of dominantly isolated salmonella serotypes and phage types.

Regarding salmonella phage types, Eighteen Out of 25 identified were S. Typhimurium which Typhimurium var. Copenhagen (32.0%) had the highest prevalent and from S. Enteritidis phage types, S. Enteritidis PT14b (5.6%) had the highest prevalence (Table 4). phage types below 1% prevalence of isolation are not included in the table.

Serotype and Phage type Nr. of samples Positive Prevalence (%) Serotype and Phage type Nr. of samples Positive Prevalence (%)
Anatum 4737 244 5.2 Infantis 4737 142 3
Braenderup 4737 160 3.4 Kentucky 4737 115 2.4
Derby 4737 470 9.9 Newport 4737 112 2.4
Dublin 4737 81 1.7 Rissen 4737 63 1.3
Eastbourne 4737 50 1.1 Thompson 4737 87 1.8
Emek 4737 53 1.1 Indiana 4737 113 2.4
Enteritidis 4737 606 12.8 Typhimurium 4737 760 16
Hadar 4737 148 3.1 Virchow 4737 61 1.3
Heidelberg 4737 73 1.5 Saintpaul 4737 165 3.5
Weltevreden 4737 52 1.1 -- -- -- --
Enteritidis PT1 197 10 5.1 Typhimurium DT004 197 2 1
Enteritidis PT13a/7 197 7 3.6 Typhimurium UT 197 4 2
Enteritidis PT4 197 10 5.1 Typhimurium DT003 197 7 3.6
Enteritidis PT6a 197 2 1 Typhimurium PT13a/7 197 6 3
Enteritidis PT14b 197 11 5.6 Typhimurium DT120 197 12 6.1
Enteritidis PT35 197 2 1 Typhimurium DT12 197 11 5.6
Typhimurium DT40 197 2 1 Typhimurium DT17 197 5 2.5
Typhimurium DT104 197 13 6.6 Typhimurium DT170 197 4 2
T. var.Copenhagen 197 63 32 Typhimurium DT193 197 16 8.1
Typhimurium DT004 197 4 2 -- -- -- --

Table 4: Prevalence of dominantly isolated salmonella serotypes and phage types.

Risk factors having contribution for the emergence of salmonella infection in humans and animals

Different risk factors causing different effects on the hosts were identified during the present review. The risk factors for infection in food animals identified were either directly or indirectly had risk of infection in humans by increased the incidence of Salmonella infection, causing outbreaks and by widespread disseminating the contamination. Trading of live infected animals for food production or pets, Mechanical rupturing of crops or intestines of poultry meat and poor hygiene of retail meat were among the predisposing factors identified as Salmonella infection in human (Table 5).

Level of
food chain
Factor Effect Reference
Consumer level -Less familiarity with preparation of new risk foods -Increased incidence of salmonellosis, in particular following emergence of new risk foods [5]
-Increasing number of elderly or immuno suppressed consumers
  Retailers and restaurants -Occasional break down in safety barriers   -Outbreaks, sometimes large   [5]
-cross-contamination in large kitchens
-use of exotic fruits and vegetables
Food production/ processing -Large-scale production of minimally processed and ready to eat products -Amplification of contamination, widespread dissemination of contaminated products [5]
-Globalized trade
Animal production systems -Trading of live infected animals for food production or pets -Spread of infection from one country or continent to another.
-Infection of large number of animals
-Transport induced stress enhances shedding and spread of Salmonella.
-Increased use of genetically similar animals in breeding pyramids
-Large-scale production systems
-Long-distance transport of animals
Feed and antimicrobial drugs for food animals -Compound feed
-international trade with feed
-Changes in intestinal ecology
-dissemination of serotypes
-selection of resistant bacteria that are passed on to humans
-Antimicrobial growth promoters
- antimicrobial treatment
Poultry Meat -During the evisceration of carcasses -Mechanical rupturing of crops or intestines can lead to external contamination of edible muscle tissues. [16]
-Cross-contamination of carcasses can occur readily
in water filled chilling tanks
Season -Cold season 29.1% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms [17]
-Hot season 72.2% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms  
Duration of crawls pace >15 days 33.3% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms [17]
≤15 days 63.3% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms  
Age of turkeys at levy >40 days 77.7% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms [17]
≤ 40 days 33.3% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms  
Storage of manure -Inside of the farm 80% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms [17]
-Outside of the farm 33.3% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms
Conservation of sick turkeys in the building -Yes 62.2% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms [17]
-No 28.1% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms  
Use of antibiotics on the first day of Turkey entry in the farm -Yes 30.5% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms [17]
-No 75% of contaminated batches in Turkey farms  
Retail meat -poor hygiene -wide spreading of Salmonella [18]
Human infection -malnutrition, HIV-AIDS, the unhygienic living circumstances -contribute to the occurrence of Salmonellosis [18]
-close relations between humans and animals    

Table 5: Risk factors that have had a major contribution for the emergence of salmonellosis.

Discussion and Conclusion

Surveillance of Salmonella serotypes and phage types from human and animal sources is relevant for detecting national and global outbreaks, for identifying the source of infection and for implementing prevention and control measures since the distribution may differ between countries. Serotyping plays an essential role in determining species, subspecies and in routine diagnosis of strains [9]. Serotyping uses highly discriminative [10] but expensive antisera that is time consuming, requires well-trained technicians, and some isolates are not typeable [4]. Antimicrobial resistance typing has poor discriminatory power [11]. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis uses for investigating outbreaks and is a gold standard for molecular typing of Salmonella and many other bacterial pathogens but it is timeconsuming and labor intensive and does not display equal sensitivity with different serovars [14]. PCR has advantage over conventional culture based detection in sensitivity, specificity, speed and possibility of automatization and have reduction in time of analysis [5].

The present review indicated that, 16.9% prevalence of Salmonella was isolated from human, food animals, food of animal origin, water, food animal farm environment, cottage cheese, fish meat and animal feed.

The risk of Salmonella shedding seems to vary by production system, housing type, general hygiene level, management type and animal age. Salmonella serotypes were isolated from different source but the detection in carcasses was considered as an indicator of carcass surface contamination [16-20]. The most common Salmonella serotypes isolated from humans correlates with common serotypes of animals and food products of animal origin. This implies that the presence of Salmonella in slaughter cattle and slaughter house environment and the potential cross contamination of carcasses and edible organs can pose food safety hazards. Salmonella infections in humans are often food borne but can also contracted through contact with infected animals. Food containing products from farm animals, especially from poultry, pigs, and cattle, are an important source of human Salmonella infections [3,21]. For example, Pigs can be considered as an important reservoir of S. Typhimurium since this serotype was frequently isolated from pig feces and pork [19]. The process of removing the gastrointestinal tract during slaughtering of food animals at abattoirs, contaminated equipment, floors, personnel of the abattoir, Excretion of symptomless animals and during butchering is one of the most source of carcass and organ contamination and Crosscontamination of carcasses and meat products could continue during subsequent handling, processing, preparation and distribution. Poor hygiene in retail meats and Mechanical rupturing of crops or intestines during the evisceration of carcasses in poultry, are risk factors for contamination and spreading the contamination [18,16].

The adaptation of Salmonella to a diversified environments, mammals, non-mammalian hosts as well as non-animated reservoirs makes their eradication by conventional means difficult. Furthermore, the existence of a wide range of Salmonella serotypes (>2500) exacerbates the control efforts although only 194 serotypes were identified in this review. In this line, food animals harbor a wide range of Salmonella serotypes and so act as source of contamination, which is of paramount epidemiological importance in non-typhoid human salmonellosis and remains a significant worldwide public health concern not only in developing countries but also in the industrialized world. Infected animals can present risk factors for transmission to humans. As the movement of people, food animals and food stuffs across national boundaries increases, this in turn expands the risk of salmonellosis. Keeping the food chain free of Salmonella is vital for preventing food infection caused by Salmonella, and the hygiene of retail meat is critical.

Therefore, periodic Surveillance of Salmonella serotypes from human, different food animals, food products and environment is relevant for detecting national and global outbreaks, for identifying the source of infection and for implementing prevention and control measures. The knowledge on the prevalent Salmonella serotypes in a country is important to understand the distribution and means of introduction into a country; Humans working with clinically affected animals should be aware of the risk of acquiring infection; Effective routine cleaning and disinfection of buildings and equipment are essential; Overstocking and overcrowding of food animals for production should be avoided; and finally, Comprehensive study of drug resistance and pattern of resistance profile is essential for treatment of infectious diseases both in animals and humans since multidrug resistance strain is common in Salmonella.