Journal of Food Nutrition and Health

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Review Paper - Journal of Food Nutrition and Health (2022) Volume 5, Issue 6

The key role of Nutrition in COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity Disease

Filip Pattyn*

Department of Medical, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

*Corresponding Author:
Filip Pattyn
Department of Medical
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Received: 20-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. AAJFNH-22-78019; Editor assigned: 24-Oct-2022, PreQC No. AAJFNH-22-78019(PQ); Reviewed: 08-Nov-2022, QC No AAJFNH-22-78019; Revised: 14-Nov-2022, AAJFNH-22-78019(R); Published: 21-Nov-2022, DOI:10.35841/aajfnh-5.6.129

Citation: Pattyn F. The key role of nutrition in COVID-19 susceptibility and severity disease. J Food Nutr Health. 2022;5(6):129

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Nutrition and Health


Hereditary, Anticancer, Malignant growth, Therapy.


These amazing open doors regardless, the utilizations of ML in nourishing the study of disease transmission should be drawn closer warily to protect the logical nature of the outcomes and give precise translations. Very enormous worldwide and ethnic contrasts in malignant growth rates exist, are negligibly made sense of by hereditary factors, and show the immense potential for disease avoidance [1]. A significant part of the distinctions in malignant growth rates can be made sense of by modifiable elements and numerous significant connections have been reported between diet, active work, and stoutness, and occurrence of significant diseases.

Other related factors, for example, the micro biome and the metabolome are arising as significant middle person parts in disease avoidance. Dietary elements are expected to assume a significant part in disease risk, clear in agreement proposals for malignant growth avoidance that advance healthful changes [2]. In any case, the proof in this field has been created dominatingly through observational examinations, which might bring about one-sided impact gauges due to jumbling, openness misclassification, and converse causality. With major geological contrasts and quick changes in malignant growth frequency over the long run, it is significant to lay out which of the observational affiliations reflect causality and to distinguish novel gamble factors as these might be altered to forestall the beginning of disease and diminish its movement.

Ailing health and muscle squandering are every now and again announced in disease patients, either connected to the actual growth or brought about by oncologic treatments. Understanding the worth of wholesome consideration during malignant growth treatment stays significant. As a matter of fact, malignant growth related sarcopenia assumes a key part in deciding higher paces of grimness, mortality, therapy prompted poison levels, delayed hospitalizations and diminished adherence to anticancer therapy, demolishing personal satisfaction and endurance [3,4]. Arranging benchmark screening to block nourishing difficulties prior, coordinating convenient reassessments, and giving sufficient guiding and dietary help, medical services proficient may emphatically disrupt this cycle and work on patients' general results during the entire illness course. A few screening devices have been proposed for this reason.

Nourishing the study of disease transmission has as of late been reprimanded on a few fronts, including the powerlessness to gauge diet precisely, and for its dependence on observational investigations to resolve etiologic inquiries. What's more, a few on-going meta-investigations with serious methodologic imperfections have come to wrong or deluding end results, reigniting discussion over previously settled discusses. All of this has brought up issues in regards to the capacity of nourishing epidemiologic examinations to illuminate strategy. These reactions, generally, come from a misconception of the methodologic issues of the field and the unseemly utilization of the medication preliminary worldview in sustenance research. Healthful consideration plans ought to be created in a multidisciplinary approach, and executed to keep up with and work on patients' wholesome condition. Normalized dietary administration including orderly gamble screening and appraisal may likewise add to decreased medical care costs. Satisfactory and ideal execution of healthful help has been connected with positive results, for example, a lessening long of clinic stay, diminished mortality, and decreases in the pace of serious difficulties, as well as enhancements in personal satisfaction and practical status [5].

Wholesome the study of disease transmission depends generally on self-revealed proportions of dietary admission, blunders in which give one-sided assessed diet-sickness affiliations. Self-detailed estimations come from surveys and food records. Impartial biomarkers are scant; be that as it may, proxy biomarkers, which are corresponded with consumption yet not unprejudiced, can likewise be helpful. It is critical to evaluate and address for the impacts of estimation mistake on diet-infection affiliations. Challenges emerge in light of the fact that there is no best quality level, and mistakes in selfrevealed estimations are corresponded with genuine admission and one another. We depict a drawn out model for blunder in poll, food record, and proxy biomarker estimations.


  1. Zhang S, Midthune D, Guenther P, et al. A new multivariate measurement error model with zero-inflated dietary data, and its application to dietary assessment. Annals of Appli Stati. 2011;5:1456–1487.
  2. Indexed at, Google Schoolar

  3. Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error. Ameri J of Epidem. 1990;132:734–745.
  4. Indexed at, Google Schoolar

  5. Tasevska N, Midthune D, Potischman N, et al. Use of the predictive sugars biomarker to evaluate self-reported total sugars intake in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) Study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2011;20:490–500.
  6. Indexed at, Google Schoolar, Cross ref

  7. Kim MK, Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, et al. Effect of five-year supplementation of vitamin C on serum vitamin C concentration and consumption of vegetables and fruit in middle-aged Japanese: a randomised controlled trial. J Amer Coll Nutri. 2003;22:208–216.
  8. Indexed at, Google Schoolar

  9. Tyler R, Barrocas A, Guenter P, et al. Value of nutrition support therapy: Impact on clinical and economic outcomes in the United States. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2020;44:395–406.
  10. Indexed at, Google Schoolar, Cross ref

Get the App