Journal of Bacteriology and Infectious Diseases

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Short Communication - Journal of Bacteriology and Infectious Diseases (2023) Volume 7, Issue 1

The categorization of bacillus strains in the molecular genetic historical period

Richard Smith*

Biological Chemical Research Institute, Michoacana University of San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Ciudad Universitaria, 58030 Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

*Corresponding Author:
Richard Smith
Biological Chemical Research Institute
Michoacana University of San Nicolás de Hidalgo
Ciudad Universitaria, 58030 Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

Received: 04-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. AABID-23-89115; Editor assigned: 06- Jan-2023, PreQC No.AABID-23-89115 (PQ); Reviewed: 20- Jan-2023, QC No AABID-23-89115; Revised: 22-Jan-2023, QC No AABID-23-89115; Published: 30-Jan-2023, DOI:10.35841/aabid-7.1.133

Citation: Smith R. The categorization of bacillus strains in the molecular genetic historical period. J Bacteriol Infec Dis. 2023;7(1):133

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Bacteriology and Infectious Diseases


Despite its obvious practical importance for identification, diagnosis, quarantine, and diversity surveys, the concept of bacterial species remains a challenging topic to develop. Genomics now provides new insights into intra-species variety as well as the possibility of the emergence of a more firmly founded system. A uniform modification to the definition is premature because existing understanding is based on too few phylogenetic groups and too few natural population samples. However, our research of five significant bacterial groups implies that more severe species definitions may be justified once a good understanding of gene content and ecological distinctiveness is established. The concept of physiologically significant clusters of diversity that applies to most eukaryotes may not be uniformly applicable in the microbial world, or if such clusters exist, they may be found at other levels of distinction.


Intra-species, Genomics, Distinction.


The total biomass of earth's smallest species, bacteria and archaea, has been calculated to be equivalent to that of terrestrial and marine plants. They are the world's largest untapped reserve of biodiversity. Nonetheless, numerous crucial features of these creatures' biology, such as what bacterial (or archaeal) species they are, remain unknown. Bacterial species are often classified using a combination of characteristics. This criterion defines a species to be essentially a collection of strains that share at least one diagnostic phenotypic trait and have at least 70% cross-hybridization (DNA-DNA hybridization, or DDH). Despite the fact that there are well over a million eukaryotic species, bacteria have been investigating evolutionary adaptations for considerably longer than eukaryotes [1]. The scientific community is increasingly finding that the species definition based on the 70% DDH standard is inadequate, which has broader implications for reliable diagnosis of infectious disease agents, intellectual property rights, international regulations for pathogen transport and possession, bioterrorism agent oversight and reporting, and quarantine. Serious confusion and injury may arise if species names are not well established, or phenotypes are not well restricted by the ‘species.

The effect of evolution

Over the whole evolutionary range spanned by the five groups studied, there is a strong, linear association between the amount of DNA that differs and evolutionary distance [2]. This equation emphasises the close relationship between evolutionary relatedness and gene content on a whole-genome scale, which is critical for species designation. Strains with genomic variations more than 0.5 Mb from any other strain in the same group have lower than 98-99% ANI to the latter strain (s). In contrast, all strains with ANI more than 98-99% have minimal genomic variations, with less than 0.2 Mb of their genome differing.

The entire genetic sequence

Comparisons of genomic sequences from the best-sampled species, E. coli and Shigella spp. indicated that the overall amount of unique DNA sequence for the species is more than 15 Mb, which equates to more than 13 000 unique genes, whereas the total conserved sequence in all genomes is around 2.5 Mb, which is almost half the genome of a normal E. coli strain (5.1 Mb; figure 4a,b). When core genes are specified slightly less stringently and are allowed to be missing from one of the 20 genomes, the core genome grows significantly, by approximately 0.5 Mb [3]. Relaxing the stringency further, for example, missing in two of the twenty genomes, has a significantly lower influence on the expansion of the core genome.

Implications for the concept of species

The species idea is the theoretical framework that aims to understand what bacterial species are and how they develop; the species definition is how the concept is applied in practise. As a result, progressing the species concept is critical for improved species definition. The current working theory for the bacterial species idea is that bacteria form coherent genomic clusters with different phenotypic features. The quantity of genetic evidence that can be utilised to evaluate the importance of selection and recombination for the species concept is currently insufficient to draw firm conclusions. However, certain trends have begun to appear, which will be discussed later [4]. Although selection is most likely strong enough to purge diversity in well-mixed, stable, and nutrientrich settings, such as inside host cells or in the laboratory, this may not be the case in ecosystems with high heterogeneity and slow growth [5].


  1. Maughan H, Van der Auwera G. Bacillus taxonomy in the genomic era finds phenotypes to be essential though often misleading. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(5):789-97.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Priest FG. Systematics and ecology of Bacillus. Biochem Physiol Mol Genet. 1993:1-6.
  4. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Rooney AP, Price NP, Ehrhardt C, et al. Phylogeny and molecular taxonomy of the Bacillus subtilis species complex and description of Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59(10):2429-36.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Fritze D. Taxonomy of the genus Bacillus and related genera: The aerobic endospore-forming bacteria. Phytopathol. 2004;94(11):1245-8.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Corander J, Tang J. Bayesian analysis of population structure based on linked molecular information. Math Biosci. 2007;205(1):19-31.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App