Microbiology: Current Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Editorial - Microbiology: Current Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Plastic-Eating Microbes: Myth or Breakthrough in Marine Pollution Control?

Stacey Hammer *

Department of Bioprocess Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Stacey Hammer
Department of Bioprocess Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada
E-mail: staham@ucdavis.edu

Received: 04-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAMCR-25-171302; Editor assigned: 05-Apr-2025, PreQC No. AAMCR-25-171302(PQ); Reviewed: 19-Apr-2025, QC No. AAMCR-25-171302; Revised: 23-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAMCR-25-171302(R); Published: 30-Apr-2025, DOI:10.35841/AAMCR-9.2.263

Citation: Hammer S. Plastic-eating microbes: Myth or breakthrough in marine pollution control?. J Micro Bio Curr Res. 2025;9(2):263

Visit for more related articles at Microbiology: Current Research

Introduction

Plastic pollution has emerged as one of the most pressing environmental challenges of the 21st century. With over 11 million metric tons of plastic entering the oceans annually, the search for innovative and sustainable solutions has intensified. Among the most intriguing prospects is the use of plastic-eating microbes—organisms capable of degrading synthetic polymers. But are these microbes a genuine breakthrough in marine pollution control, or merely a scientific myth inflated by hope and headlines? Marine plastic pollution affects ecosystems, wildlife, and human health. Microplastics, which result from the breakdown of larger plastic debris, are ingested by marine organisms and bioaccumulate up the food chain, potentially reaching humans. These plastics also leach toxic additives and act as vectors for pathogens, exacerbating their environmental impact [1].

Traditional waste management systems, including recycling and incineration, have proven insufficient to stem the tide of plastic waste. This has led researchers to explore biological alternatives, including microbial degradation. Plastic-eating microbes are not science fiction. Several bacterial and fungal species have demonstrated the ability to degrade plastics under laboratory conditions. The most famous example is Ideonella sakaiensis, discovered near a recycling facility in Japan. This bacterium produces PETase and MHETase enzymes that break down polyethylene terephthalate (PET), commonly used in bottles and packaging [2].

Other promising candidates include Pseudomonas stutzeri, which has shown potential in degrading PET through bioengineering and directed evolution. These microbes utilize plastic as a carbon source, converting it into simpler compounds that can be assimilated or further degraded. While terrestrial microbes have shown promise, marine environments pose unique challenges. Salinity, temperature fluctuations, and low nutrient availability can inhibit microbial activity. Moreover, plastics in the ocean are often weathered, oxidized, and colonized by biofilms, making them more resistant to degradation [3].

Plastic-eating microbes represent a promising frontier in marine pollution control. While not a panacea, they offer a biologically inspired tool to complement existing strategies. The myth lies not in their existence, but in the expectation that they can single-handedly solve the plastic crisis. With continued research, responsible innovation, and integrated policy support, these microbes could become a vital part of the solution—transforming pollution into possibility. Nonetheless, researchers have identified marine microbes capable of partial plastic degradation. For example, strains of Gordonia and Arthrobacter isolated from peat bogs and compost have degraded polypropylene and polystyrene by up to 23% and 19.5%, respectively, in 28 days—without pretreatment. These findings suggest that plastic-degrading potential may be more widespread than previously thought. Despite the excitement, plastic-eating microbes are not a silver bullet. Most studies are conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, which do not reflect the complexity of marine ecosystems. Degradation rates are often slow, and complete mineralization of plastic is rare [4].

Additionally, the term “plastic-eating” can be misleading. Microbes do not consume plastic in the way animals eat food. Instead, they enzymatically break down polymers into smaller molecules, which may or may not be fully assimilated. Incomplete degradation can lead to the formation of microplastics, potentially worsening the problem. To overcome these limitations, scientists are turning to synthetic biology and bioengineering. By enhancing enzyme efficiency, stability, and specificity, researchers aim to create microbial strains capable of rapid and complete plastic degradation. For instance, Thermus thermophilus, a heat-tolerant bacterium, has been engineered to express plastic-degrading enzymes that function at elevated temperatures, improving degradation rates. Portable bioreactors powered by solar energy are also being developed to deploy these microbes in polluted areas. These systems could offer localized solutions for plastic remediation, especially in coastal regions and marine hotspots [5].

Conclusion

Introducing engineered microbes into marine environments raises ethical and ecological concerns. Potential risks include unintended interactions with native species, horizontal gene transfer, and disruption of existing microbial communities. Rigorous testing and containment strategies are essential to ensure safety and efficacy. Moreover, microbial degradation should complement—not replace—efforts to reduce plastic production, improve waste management, and promote circular economy principles. To realize the potential of plastic-eating microbes, interdisciplinary collaboration is key. Researchers must work with policymakers, industry stakeholders, and environmental organizations to develop scalable, safe, and effective bioremediation strategies.

References

  1. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451(7181):990-3.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2004;430(6996):242-9.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Woolhouse ME, Haydon DT, Antia R. Emerging pathogens: the epidemiology and evolution of species jumps. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(5):238-44.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Fauci AS, Morens DM. The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(5):454-61.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Taubenberger JK, Morens DM. 1918 Influenza: the mother of all pandemics. Revista Biomedica. 2006;17(1):69-79.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Fan CY, Fann JC, Yang MC. Estimating global burden of COVID-19 with disability-adjusted life years and value of statistical life metrics. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:S106-17.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Weaver SC, Costa F, Garcia-Blanco MA. Zika virus: History, emergence, biology, and prospects for control. Antivir Res. 2016;130:69-80.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Spellberg B, Guidos R, Gilbert D. The epidemic of antibiotic-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(2):155-64.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Gubler DJ. Dengue, urbanization and globalization: the unholy trinity of the 21st century. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;39(4SUPPLEMENT):S3-11.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Lederberg J. Emerging infections: microbial threats to health. Trends Microbiol. 1993;1(2):43-4.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App