Archives of General Internal Medicine

Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Rapid Communication - Archives of General Internal Medicine (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1

Personalized Medicine in Internal Medicine: Current Trends and Challenges

Amed Mariony *

Department of Pulmonology, Beijing Medical University Beijing, China

*Corresponding Author:
Amed Mariony
Department of Pulmonology, Beijing Medical University Beijing, China
E-mail: a.atom@osu.edu

Received: 02-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. AAAGIM-25-162827; Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2025, PreQC No. AAAGIM-25-162827 (PQ) Reviewed:17-Jan-2025, QC No. AAAGIM-25-162827Revised:24-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. AAAGIM-25-162827 (R); Published:28-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.35841/aaagim.9.1.273

Citation: Mariony A. Personalized Medicine in Internal Medicine: Current Trends and Challenges. Arch Gen Intern Med. 2025;9(1):273

Visit for more related articles at Archives of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

  

Introduction

Personalized medicine is a rapidly emerging approach to healthcare that tailors medical treatment to individual characteristics, such as genetic makeup, lifestyle, and environment. In internal medicine, this paradigm is revolutionizing patient care by enabling more effective, targeted, and individualized treatment plans [1]. However, while personalized medicine holds immense promise, it also presents several challenges that need to be addressed. This short communication will explore the current trends in personalized medicine in internal medicine and the challenges associated with its implementation.

Current trends in personalized medicine

One of the most significant trends in personalized medicine is the integration of genetic testing and genomics into clinical practice. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have made it easier and more affordable to analyze an individual’s genetic makeup. These genetic insights allow clinicians to predict the likelihood of certain diseases, understand the genetic basis of existing conditions, and select therapies that are more likely to be effective. For example, genetic tests are now commonly used in oncology to identify specific mutations in cancer cells, which guide the selection of targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer [2].

In addition to genomics, personalized medicine in internal medicine also involves the use of biomarker-based diagnostics. Biomarkers are measurable indicators of disease that can help in diagnosing conditions, monitoring disease progression, and predicting therapeutic outcomes. For instance, biomarkers are increasingly being used in cardiovascular diseases to assess a patient’s risk of heart attack or stroke. Similarly, in autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, biomarkers can help predict which patients are likely to respond to specific immunotherapies [3].

Another growing trend is the use of pharmacogenomics, which examines how a patient’s genetic makeup affects their response to drugs. By analyzing a patient’s genetic profile, healthcare providers can predict adverse drug reactions and identify the most effective medications. For example, genetic variations in the enzyme CYP450 can impact the metabolism of common drugs, such as warfarin, a blood thinner. Personalized dosing based on pharmacogenomic information can help minimize side effects and improve treatment efficacy[4].

Challenges in Personalized Medicine

While personalized medicine offers transformative potential, several challenges hinder its widespread adoption in internal medicine. One of the primary challenges is the high cost of genetic testing and personalized therapies. Although the cost of genetic sequencing has decreased in recent years, comprehensive genetic tests and targeted treatments can still be prohibitively expensive, especially for patients without adequate insurance coverage. This financial barrier can limit access to personalized care, creating disparities in healthcare outcomes.

Another challenge is the complexity of data interpretation. Genomic data is often vast and complex, making it difficult for clinicians to interpret the clinical significance of specific genetic variations. Furthermore, the availability of high-quality data on the effectiveness of personalized therapies is still limited. While personalized medicine has shown great promise in certain areas, such as cancer, evidence for its efficacy in other fields, such as cardiovascular and neurological diseases, is still evolving [5-8].

There are also concerns regarding privacy and data security. Genetic data is highly sensitive, and the potential misuse of such information for purposes like discrimination in employment or insurance raises ethical and legal concerns. Healthcare providers must ensure that genetic information is protected, and patients are adequately informed about how their data will be used and stored.

Finally, integrating personalized medicine into clinical practice requires significant changes to healthcare infrastructure. Medical professionals must be trained in genomics and bioinformatics, and healthcare systems need to be equipped with the tools and resources to handle complex genetic data. This shift will require ongoing education, investment in technology, and the development of standardized guidelines to ensure the appropriate use of personalized treatments [9,10].

Conclusion

Personalized medicine represents a transformative approach to internal medicine, offering the potential for more precise and effective treatments tailored to individual patients. However, challenges such as high costs, data complexity, privacy concerns, and the need for infrastructure upgrades must be addressed to fully realize its potential. Continued advancements in technology, along with collaboration between clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, will be essential to overcome these obstacles and ensure that personalized medicine becomes an accessible and integral part of modern healthcare.

References

  1. Scheinecker C, Göschl L, Bonelli M. Treg cells in health and autoimmune diseases: New insights from single cell analysis. J Autoimmun. 2020;110:102376.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Lee DS, Rojas OL, Gommerman JL. B cell depletion therapies in autoimmune disease: advances and mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(3):179-99.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Dominguez-Villar M, Hafler DA. Regulatory T cells in autoimmune disease. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(7):665-73.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Berentsen S. New insights in the pathogenesis and therapy of cold agglutinin-mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Front Immunol. 2020;11:535536.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Graney BA, Fischer A. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(5):525-33.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Robinson GA, Wilkinson MG, Wincup C. The role of immunometabolism in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immuno. 2022;12:806560.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Pape K, Tamouza R, Leboyer M, et al. Immunoneuropsychiatry—novel perspectives on brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(6):317-28.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Mueller AL, Payandeh Z, Mohammadkhani N, et al. Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: new treatment strategies. Cells. 2021;10(11):3017.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Shigesi N, Kvaskoff M, Kirtley S, et al. The association between endometriosis and autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(4):486-503.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Bar-Or A, Li R. Cellular immunology of relapsing multiple sclerosis: interactions, checks, and balances. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(6):470-83.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App