Mini Review - Integrative Neuroscience Research (2025) Volume 8, Issue 2
Neuroimaging: Unlocking the complexities of the human brain.
Thane Claira*Department of Health Sciences, Lehigh University, USA
- *Corresponding Author:
- Thane Claira
Department of Health Sciences
Lehigh University, USA
E-mail: thaneclaira@lehigh.edu
Received: 01-Jun-2025, Manuscript No. AAINR-25-171525; Editor assigned: 03-Jun-2025, Pre QC No. AAINR-25-171525 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Jun-2025, QC No. AAINR-25-171525; Revised: 21-Jun-2025, Manuscript No. AAINR-25-171525 (R); Published: 28-Jun-2025, DOI: 10.35841/ aainr-8.2.190
Citation: Claira T. Neuroimaging: Unlocking the complexities of the human brain. Integr Neuro Res 2025;8(2):190
Introduction
Neuroimaging techniques have profoundly transformed the study of the human brain, providing scientists and clinicians with the ability to visualize its structure, function, and connectivity in remarkable detail. These tools have not only deepened our understanding of normal brain processes but have also advanced the diagnosis and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Over recent decades, imaging technologies have evolved from basic structural scans to sophisticated functional and molecular approaches, enabling exploration of the dynamic activities of neural circuits and their relationship to cognition and behavior.[1].
Structural imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), remain the foundation of neuroimaging. MRI offers high-resolution images of brain tissues, making it invaluable for detecting abnormalities like tumors, lesions, and developmental malformations. CT scans, although lower in resolution, provide rapid imaging and are particularly useful in emergency contexts for identifying fractures or hemorrhages. Together, these techniques are essential for mapping brain anatomy and identifying pathological changes. [2].
Functional neuroimaging extends beyond anatomy to examine brain activity in real time. Functional MRI (fMRI) measures changes in blood oxygenation to identify brain regions involved in cognitive tasks and sensory processing, while positron emission tomography (PET) uses radiotracers to assess metabolic activity, neurotransmitter systems, and receptor distributions. These methods have become central to understanding neurological conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, and depression, bridging the gap between brain structure and function.[3].
Diffusion imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), adds another dimension by mapping the brain’s white matter tracts and connectivity patterns. By tracking water molecule diffusion along axons, DTI reveals how different brain regions communicate and how these networks are disrupted in disorders such as multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, and schizophrenia. This structural connectivity mapping complements functional imaging, providing a more comprehensive perspective on neural networks. [4].
Recent advances in multimodal imaging have further enhanced neuroimaging capabilities by integrating structural, functional, and molecular information. Combining modalities such as fMRI with electroencephalography (EEG) or PET allows simultaneous analysis of electrical activity, metabolic processes, and anatomical structures. These approaches improve diagnostic accuracy, guide neurosurgical planning, and support the development of personalized therapies, offering a holistic view of complex neurological conditions.[5].
Conclusion
Neuroimaging has revolutionized neuroscience and clinical practice by delivering detailed insights into brain structure, function, and connectivity. With continuing technological progress, these tools are achieving higher resolution, greater precision, and novel applications for studying the brain in vivo. Looking ahead, neuroimaging will play a critical role in early diagnosis, treatment planning, and advancing our understanding of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The integration of structural, functional, and molecular imaging promises to unlock deeper knowledge of the brain and pave the way for improved human health outcomes.
References
- Penfield W, Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain. 1937;60(4):389-443.
- Power JD, Schlaggar BL, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, et al. Evidence for hubs in human functional brain networks. Neuron. 2013;79(4):798-813.
- Ruzzano L, Borsboom D, Geurts HM. Repetitive behaviors in autism and obsessive–compulsive disorder: New perspectives from a network analysis. J Autism Developmental Disorders, 2015;45(1):192-202.
- Salvador R, Suckling J, Coleman MR, et al. Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 2005;15(9):1332-42.
- Aharoni E, Funk C, Sinnott-Armstrong W, et al. Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience. Annals New York Academy Sciences. 2008;1124(1):145-60.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref