Journal of Brain and Neurology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Brain and Neurology (2025) Volume 8, Issue 3

Neural connectivity: Mapping the brains complex networks

Hyunjoon Kong*

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular, University of Illinois, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Hyunjoon Kong
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular
University of Illinois, USA
E-mail: hjko06@illinois.edu

Received: 02-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. AAJBN-25-171410; Editor assigned: 03-Aug-2025, Pre QC No. AAJBN-25-171410 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Aug-2025, QC No. AAJBN-25-171410; Revised: 20-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. AAJBN-25-171410 (R); Published: 27-Aug-2025, DOI: 10.35841/aajbn-8.3.201

Citation: Kong H. Neural connectivity: Mapping the brain’s complex networks. J Brain Neurol. 2025;8(3):201

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Brain and Neurology

Introduction

Neural connectivity represents the intricate web of connections between neurons in the brain, forming the foundation of all cognitive, sensory, and motor functions. This connectivity underlies the brain’s remarkable ability to process information, adapt to experiences, and respond to environmental stimuli. Advances in neuroimaging and electrophysiological techniques have enabled scientists to visualize and quantify these networks, revealing the complex interplay between different brain regions. Understanding neural connectivity is crucial not only for mapping normal brain function but also for identifying alterations associated with neurological and psychiatric disorders. [1].

The brain’s connectivity can be broadly categorized into structural and functional networks. Structural connectivity refers to the physical pathways, such as axons and dendrites, that link neurons and brain regions, while functional connectivity describes patterns of coordinated activity across different areas. These networks are dynamic, constantly reorganizing in response to learning, injury, or disease. Techniques like diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) have provided detailed insights into white matter tracts, illustrating how structural connections support efficient communication across the brain. [2].

Functional connectivity is often studied using methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). These approaches allow researchers to measure synchronous activity between brain regions, revealing networks that support cognitive processes like memory, attention, and decision-making. Disruptions in functional connectivity are associated with various neurological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, and epilepsy, highlighting the importance of network integrity for maintaining mental and physical health.[3].

Recent studies have emphasized the concept of the connectome, a comprehensive map of neural connections in the brain. The Human Connectome Project has been instrumental in advancing our understanding of how these networks are organized, showing that the brain operates through a balance of segregated specialized modules and integrated communication pathways. Mapping the connectome provides a framework for linking structural and functional data, offering a holistic view of brain organization and its relationship to behavior and cognition. [4].

Neural connectivity is not static; it exhibits remarkable plasticity throughout life. Synaptic connections strengthen or weaken based on experience, learning, and environmental factors, allowing the brain to adapt and reorganize. This plasticity underlies rehabilitation after brain injury and is a central focus in developing therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Interventions such as cognitive training, neuromodulation, and targeted pharmacological treatments aim to restore or enhance connectivity in affected networks, offering hope for improved outcomes in patients with impaired brain function. [5].

Conclusion

Understanding neural connectivity also has profound implications for artificial intelligence and brain-computer interfaces. By modeling how networks of neurons process information and communicate, researchers can develop algorithms that mimic human cognition.

References

  1. Spiegel EA, Wycis HT, Marks M, et al. Stereotaxic apparatus for operations on the human brain. Science 1947;106(2754):349-50.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  2. Vedam-Mai V, van Battum EY, Kamphuis W, et al. Deep brain stimulation and the role of astrocytes. Mol Psychiatry 2012;17:124-31.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Charles PD, Gill CE, Davis TL, et al. Is deep brain stimulation neuroprotective if applied early in the course of PD? Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2008;4:424-6.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  4. Hariz MI, Blomstedt P, Zrinzo L. Deep brain stimulation 1947 and 1987: the untold story. Neurosurg Focus 2010;29:1-10.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Zhao H, Chang R, Che H, et al. Hyperphosphorylation of tau protein by calpain regulation in retina of Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mouse. Neurosci Lett. 2013;551:12-6.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Get the App