Journal of Pain Management and Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Pain Management and Therapy (2024) Volume 8, Issue 2

Mastering metered-dose inhalers effective inhaler technique

Clark Bastian*

Department of Medicine, Bielefeld University, Germany

*Corresponding Author:
Clark Bastian
Department of Medicine, Bielefeld University, Germany
Bielefeld University

Received:20-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. AAPMT-24-130196; Editor assigned: 23-Feb-2024, PreQC No. AAPMT-24-130196(PQ); Reviewed:08-Mar-2024, QC No. AAPMT-24-130196; Revised:13-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. AAPMT-24-130196(R); Published:20-Mar-2024, DOI:10.35841/ aapmt-8.2.196

Citation: Bastian C. Mastering metered-dose inhalers effective inhaler technique. J Pain Manage Ther. 2024;8(2):196

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Pain Management and Therapy


Metered-Dose Inhalers (MDIs) are essential tools in the management of respiratory conditions such as asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Despite their widespread use, many patients struggle with proper inhaler technique, leading to suboptimal medication delivery and poor disease control. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of MDIs, including their mechanism of action, components, common mistakes, and techniques for optimal use. Metered-dose inhalers consist of three primary components: a canister containing the medication, a metering valve, and a mouthpiece. The medication is stored in the canister under pressure, and when the inhaler is activated, a precise dose of medication is released as an aerosol spray. The patient inhales the medication, allowing it to reach the lungs directly, where it can exert its therapeutic effects[1,2].

Despite their simplicity, using MDIs correctly can be challenging for many patients. Common mistakes include, Failure to shake the inhaler before use: Shaking the inhaler ensures that the medication is adequately mixed, promoting uniform dosing. Proper inhaler positioning: Holding the inhaler at the wrong angle or distance from the mouth can lead to reduced medication delivery to the lungs. Inadequate coordination: Patients often struggle to coordinate pressing the canister and inhaling, resulting in medication deposition in the mouth or throat rather than the lungs[3].

Incomplete exhalation: Failing to exhale fully before inhaling can limit the amount of medication reaching the lungs. Lack of breath-holding: Holding the breath for a few seconds after inhaling allows the medication to penetrate deeper into the lungs, maximizing its effectiveness. To achieve optimal medication delivery with MDIs, patients should follow these steps: Shake the inhaler vigorously for a few seconds to ensure proper mixing of the medication[4].

Remove the cap from the mouthpiece and exhale fully to empty the lungs. Hold the inhaler upright, with the mouthpiece between the lips, forming a tight seal. Press down on the canister while simultaneously inhaling deeply and slowly. Hold the breath for 5-10 seconds to allow the medication to reach deep into the lungs. Exhale slowly and, if necessary, rinse the mouth to minimize side effects such as oral thrush[5].

Healthcare providers play a crucial role in educating patients about proper inhaler technique. This includes demonstrating correct usage, providing written instructions, and periodically assessing and reinforcing technique during follow-up visits. Additionally, healthcare professionals should address any misconceptions or concerns patients may have about their inhalers to ensure optimal adherence and disease management[6].

Metered-dose inhalers are indispensable tools in the treatment of respiratory conditions, providing rapid and targeted delivery of medication to the lungs. By mastering proper inhaler technique, patients can maximize the effectiveness of their treatment and achieve better disease control. Healthcare providers must prioritize patient education and support to empower individuals to manage their respiratory conditions effectively with MDIs[7-10].


  1. Cochrane MG, Bala MV, Downs KE, et al. Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma therapy: patient compliance, devices, and inhalation technique. Chest. 2000;117(2):542-50.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Chapman KR, Love L, Brubaker H. A comparison of breath-actuated and conventional metered-dose inhaler inhalation techniques in elderly subjects. Chest. 1993;104(5):1332-7.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Lenney J, Innes JA, Crompton GK. Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. Resp med. 2000;94(5):496-500.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Epstein S, Maidenberg A, Hallett D, et al. Patient handling of a dry-powder inhaler in clinical practice. Chest. 2001;120(5):1480-4.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Lavorini F, Fontana GA, Usmani OS. New inhaler devices-the good, the bad and the ugly. Resp. 2014;88:3-15.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Sanchis J, Corrigan C, Levy ML, et al. Inhaler devices–from theory to practice. Resp med. 2013;107:495-502.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Virchow JC, Crompton GK, Dal Negro R, et al. Importance of inhaler devices in the management of airway disease. Resp med. 2008;102(1):10-9.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Stein SW, Thiel CG. The history of therapeutic aerosols: a chronological review. J Aerosol Med Pulmon Drug Deliv. 2017;30(1):20-41.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Usmani OS, Scullion J, Keeley D. Our planet or our patients—is the sky the limit for inhaler choice?. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(1):11-3.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Keeley D, Scullion JE, Usmani OS. Minimising the environmental impact of inhaled therapies: problems with policy on low carbon inhalers. Euro Resp J. 2020;55(2).
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App