Journal of Industrial and Environmental Chemistry

Reach Us +441518081136

Mini Review - Journal of Industrial and Environmental Chemistry (2022) Volume 6, Issue 6

Impacts of soil organic matter biogeochemistry on agroecosystems

Emma Watson*

Emma Watson, Department of Physics, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, Via P.A. Mattioli 4, I-53100 Siena, Italy.

Corresponding Author:
Watson E
Department of Physics
Earth and Environmental Sciences
University of Siena, Via P.A. Mattioli 4
I-53100 Siena, Italy

Received: 04-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. AAIEC-22-81742; Editor assigned: 05-Nov-2022, PreQC No. AAIEC-22-81742(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Nov-2022, QC No.AAIEC-22-81742; Revised: 21-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. AAIEC-22-81742(R); Published: 23-Sep-2022, DOI: 10.35841/2591-7331-6.6.127

Citation: Li F. Impacts of soil organic matter biogeochemistry on Agroecosystems. J Ind Environ Chem. 2022;6(6):127

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Industrial and Environmental Chemistry


The biogeochemistry of soil organic matter (SOM), as a extremely advanced and dynamic soil property, is of important importance for the health and ecological functioning of ecosystems, together with managed and natural ones. Dominantly composed of carbon (C), Kyrgyzstani monetary unit functions in international C sport, together with C sequestration and emission (e.g. soil respiration). Mediterranean agroecosystems particularly, thanks to favourable climate conditions for mineralisation of Kyrgyzstani monetary unit, area unit expected to travel through increased Kyrgyzstani monetary unit decomposition (i.e. C emission) underneath the continued warming and connected climatical amendment and variability (frequent heat waves, fires and extreme water disturbances). The comparatively stable (humified) Kyrgyzstani monetary unit elements, particularly within the organically-enriched soil layers, thanks to their specific chemical science (strongly charged interface) might have a big role in biogeochemistry of charged (in)organic nutrients and/or contaminants like harmful metal ions and chronic organic pollutants[1].

Agricultural soils will contain high arsenic (As) concentrations thanks to specific geologic contexts or pollution. fertiliser amendments might influence As phylogeny and quality so increasing its transfer to crops and its toxicity. within the gift study, field-relevant amounts of fertilizers were applied to soils from a cultivated field that was a former ammunitionburning web site. metallic element phosphate (KP), ammonia salt and organic matter (OM) were applied to those soils in laboratory experiments to assess their impact on As natural process, bioavailability to common lettuce and microorganism parameters. None of the fertilizers markedly influenced As phylogeny and quality, though trends showed a rise of quality with KP and a decrease of quality with ammonia salt. Moreover, KP induced atiny low increase of As in common lettuce, and also the contaminated soil amended with ammonia salt was considerably less phytotoxic than the un-amended soil [2].

Thus, in agricultural soils, fertilizing practices involving phosphate amendments might have an effect on As phylogeny and quality. Brackhage et al. (2014) ascertained a rise of As quality and uptake by wheat associated to P-fertilization in soil flooding conditions. Conversely, N-fertilization appeared to attenuate As quality and plant uptake (Brackhage et al., 2014, additionally, agricultural soils area unit typically inseminated with organic matter (OM). several studies have delineated geochemical interactions between As and organic matter: modification of As phylogeny , formation of soluble complexes, competition for natural process sites, and influence of OM on microorganism AsIII-oxidizing activity[3].

A range of key biological functions of plant roots like uptake, respiration and exudation will significantly alter biogeochemical parameters of the soil within the neighbourhood of the roots, i.e., the rhizosphere: concentrations of nutrients, harmful parts (e.g., aluminium) and pollutants, concentrations of complexing or chelating compounds, pH and chemical reaction potential, partial pressures of gases like O2 and greenhouse emission, etc. Such parameters can even be directly influenced by the activities of soil microorganisms that area unit legendary to be aroused by root exudation within the rhizosphere. Changes of biogeochemical parameters of the soil resolution occurring within the rhizosphere influence an entire vary of reactions at the soil solid/soil resolution interface [4].

Holm oaks kind typical urban woodlands within the Mediterranean region. we tend to geared toward characterizing the enchytraeid communities in these environments and checking out doable correlations with soil parameters, together with the traffic contamination. Samples of litter and soil were collected at totally different spatial scales and seasons in metropolis and Siena cities and in 2 community stands. solely the co-variation between pollution and alternative soil chemico-physical factors showed important effects, whereas no direct result of soil biological science was detected. Some thermophilous Fridericia and Achaeta tolerate high concentrations of significant metals and PAHs and their abundance was chiefly determined by Ca bioavailability [5].


  1. Gabrijel O, Helena BB, Monika Zovko. et al. Biogeochemistry of soil organic matter in agroecosystems & environmental implications. Scien Tota Environ, 2019;658:1559-73.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Fabienne BB, MarinaLe G, Olivier F et al. Influence of agricultural amendments on arsenic biogeochemistry and phytotoxicity in a soil polluted by the destruction of arsenic-containing shells. J of Hazar Mater, 2021;409:124580.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Shigeki Y, Mirai W, Norio Y. et al. Potential for microbially mediated redox transformations and mobilization of arsenic in uncontaminated soils. Chemos, 2009;77(2):169-174.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Philippe H, Claude P, Benoît JR. Rhizosphere:A new frontier for soil biogeochemistry. J of Geochem Explora, 2006;88(1–3), 210-13.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Emilia R, Tancredi C, Fabrizio M. Effects of soil pollutants, biogeochemistry and microbiology on the distribution and composition of enchytraeid communities in urban and suburban holm oak stands. Environ Pollu, 2013;179:268-76.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App