Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Case Report - Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation (2023) Volume 7, Issue 3

Geostatistical Approaches for Resource Estimation in Mining and Exploration

Aijun Gu*

Department of Geostatistics, Columbia University, New York, United States

Corresponding Author:
Aijun Gu
Department of Geostatistics
Columbia University, New York, United States
E-mail: guaijun@columbia.edu

Received: 19-July-2023, Manuscript No. AAERAR-23- 108938; Editor assigned: 20-July-2023, PreQC No. AAERAR-23-108938 (PQ); Reviewed: 03-Aug-2023, QC No: AAERAR-23-108938; Revised: 10-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. AAERAR-23-108938 (R); Published: 17-Aug-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aaerar-7.3.182

Citation: Gu A. Geostatistical Approaches for Resource Estimation in Mining and Exploration. J Environ Risk Assess Remediat. 2023;7(3):182

Visit for more related articles at Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation


In the dynamic realm of mining and exploration, accurate estimation of mineral resources is paramount for informed decision-making, efficient extraction, and sustainable resource management. Geostatistics, a powerful statistical methodology, has revolutionized the way we estimate reserves, guiding the mining industry toward precision, optimization, and reduced environmental impact. By unraveling the spatial complexities of subsurface deposits, geostatistical techniques provide a robust framework for harnessing Earth's treasures while minimizing uncertainty and waste [1].

Resource estimation in mining and exploration is a multifaceted endeavor. It involves deciphering the distribution, shape, and grade of valuable minerals concealed beneath the Earth's surface. Traditional estimation methods often rely on sparse data points, leading to potential inaccuracies and inadequate representation of spatial variability. Geostatistics steps in to address these challenges by incorporating spatial relationships and utilizing the wealth of information embedded in the data [2].

At the heart of geostatistical resource estimation lie two foundational techniques: kriging and variography. Kriging is a spatial interpolation method that considers not only the measured values at sample locations but also the spatial relationships between them. This enables the creation of detailed resource models that accurately depict the mineral distribution across the entire deposit. Variography complements kriging by quantifying the spatial continuity and variability of mineralization. Through variogram analysis, geostatists can determine the optimal distance and direction for interpolation, enhancing the accuracy of resource estimation [3].

Geostatistical approaches enable mining companies to optimize their drilling and sampling strategies. By analyzing spatial patterns of mineralization, geostatistics guides the placement and density of boreholes, ensuring that samples are collected from areas with the greatest potential for resource discovery. This targeted approach minimizes drilling costs, reduces environmental disturbance, and accelerates the exploration process. Geostatistics also aids in identifying gaps in data coverage, helping explorers make informed decisions about where to focus their efforts [4].

Geostatistical techniques contribute to reducing uncertainty in resource estimates. By integrating various sources of data, such as drill hole data, geophysical surveys, and geological information, geostatistics provides a comprehensive and holistic understanding of the subsurface. This holistic view translates into more accurate estimates of tonnage, grade, and ore quality. Moreover, geostatistics quantifies uncertainty through measures like estimation variance, enabling stakeholders to assess the reliability of resource models and make risk-informed decisions [5, 6].


Geostatistical approaches have revolutionized resource estimation in mining and exploration. By unraveling the spatial intricacies of subsurface deposits, geostatistics empowers the industry to make informed decisions, optimize operations, and contribute to sustainable resource management. Through kriging, variography, and the integration of diverse data sources, geostatistics transforms raw data into comprehensive models that guide the efficient extraction of Earth's valuable minerals. As mining continues to evolve, geostatistics will remain an essential tool, bridging the gap between Earth's hidden riches and responsible, environmentally conscious resource utilization.


  1. Lee H, Choi Y, Suh J. Mapping copper and lead concentrations at abandoned mine areas using element analysis data from ICP–AES and portable XRF instruments: A comparative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2016;13(4):384.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Ortiz JM, Emery X. Geostatistical estimation of mineral resources with soft geological boundaries: a comparative study. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2006;106(8):577.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Knobloch A, Kuhn T, Rühlemann C. Predictive mapping of the nodule abundance and mineral resource estimation in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone using artificial neural networks and classical geostatistical methods. Deep-sea mining: Resource potential, technical and environmental considerations. 2017:189-212.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Afeni TB, Akeju VO, Aladejare AE. A comparative study of geometric and geostatistical methods for qualitative reserve estimation of limestone deposit. Geosci. Front. 2021;12(1):243-53.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Rendu JM. Geostatistical simulations for risk assessment and decision making: the mining industry perspective. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2002;16(2):122-33.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Kim SM, Choi Y. Assessing statistically significant heavy-metal concentrations in abandoned mine areas via hot spot analysis of portable XRF data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2017;14(6):654.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App