Journal of Brain and Neurology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Perspective - Journal of Brain and Neurology (2025) Volume 8, Issue 3

Functional MRI: Unlocking brains dynamic activity.

Diego Vidaurre*

Department of Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Denmark

*Corresponding Author:
Diego Vidaurre
Department of Integrative Neuroscience
Aarhus University, Denmark
E-mail: Sonles.alonso@cfin.au.dk

Received: 02-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. AAJBN-25-171420; Editor assigned: 03-Aug-2025, Pre QC No. AAJBN-25-171420 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Aug-2025, QC No. AAJBN-25-171420; Revised: 20-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. AAJBN-25-171420 (R); Published: 27-Aug-2025, DOI: 10.35841/aajbn-8.3.210

Citation: Alonso S. Neurodegeneration: Understanding progressive neural decline. J Brain Neurol. 2025;8(3):210

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Brain and Neurology

Introduction

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a groundbreaking neuroimaging technique that allows researchers and clinicians to observe brain activity in real time. Unlike conventional MRI, which provides static images of anatomical structures, fMRI measures changes in blood flow associated with neural activity. This is based on the principle that areas of the brain that are more active consume more oxygen, and the resulting hemodynamic response can be detected as variations in the magnetic properties of blood. The development of fMRI has revolutionized our understanding of brain function and connectivity. [1].

The utility of fMRI extends across both research and clinical applications. In neuroscience research, it provides insights into cognitive processes, sensory perception, and emotional regulation. By mapping the brain regions activated during specific tasks or stimuli, researchers can infer the functional organization of the brain. Clinically, fMRI is increasingly used for pre-surgical planning, particularly in cases involving brain tumors or epilepsy. Identifying critical regions involved in speech, motor function, and sensory processing helps minimize risks during neurosurgical procedures. [2].

One of the key advantages of fMRI is its noninvasive nature. Unlike techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET), which require the injection of radioactive tracers, fMRI relies solely on the natural properties of blood oxygenation. This allows for repeated studies over time without exposing patients to radiation. Additionally, fMRI provides high spatial resolution, enabling the detection of activity at a millimeter scale, which is crucial for understanding fine-grained functional distinctions in the brain.[3].

Despite its many advantages, fMRI does have limitations. The technique measures indirect markers of neuronal activity rather than direct electrical activity, which can sometimes lead to ambiguity in interpreting results. Moreover, fMRI is sensitive to movement artifacts, requiring subjects to remain very still during scans. The temporal resolution is also limited compared to methods like electroencephalography (EEG), making it challenging to capture rapid neural events. Nevertheless, advancements in imaging sequences and data analysis continue to enhance the accuracy and reliability of fMRI studies. [4].

Recent innovations in fMRI include resting-state functional connectivity and multi-modal imaging. Resting-state fMRI examines the brain’s intrinsic activity when a subject is not engaged in any task, revealing networks that underlie cognitive and emotional processes. Combining fMRI with other techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging or magnetoencephalography allows researchers to study both structural and functional aspects of neural circuits. These integrated approaches are helping to uncover the complexity of brain networks and their alterations in neurological and psychiatric disorders. [5].

Conclusion

functional MRI has emerged as an indispensable tool in neuroscience and clinical practice. By providing a window into the dynamic processes of the brain, it has expanded our understanding of cognition, emotion, and neurological disease. While challenges remain in terms of interpretation and temporal precision, ongoing technological and methodological advancements promise to further refine this powerful imaging modality.

References

  1. Yamamoto T, Kobayashi K, Kasai M, et al. DBS therapy for the vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005:101-4.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Della Pepa GM, Fukaya C, La Rocca G, et al. Neuromodulation of vegetative state through spinal cord stimulation: where are we now and where are we going?. SFN. 2013;91(5):275-87.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Cohadon F, Richer E. Stimulation cérébrale profonde chez les patients en état végétatif post-traumatique: 25 observations. Neuro-chirurgie (Paris). 1993;39(5):281-92.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Funahashi K, Komai N, Ogura M, et al. Effects and indications of spinal cord stimulation on the vegetative syndrome. No Shinkei Geka. Neurological Surgery. 1989;17(10):917-23.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Kanno T, Kamel Y, Yokoyama T, et al. Effects of dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (DCS) on reversibility of neuronal function—experience of treatment for vegetative states.PACE.1989 ;12(4):733-8.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App