Journal of Molecular Oncology Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Rapid Communication - Journal of Molecular Oncology Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1

Exploring synthetic lethality and microbiome-cancer interactions: A new frontier in oncology

Ling Cai *

Department of Cancer Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore

*Corresponding Author:
Ling Cai
Department of Cancer Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore
E-mail: ling@cai.sg

Received: 01-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. AAMOR -25-161673; Editor assigned: 02-Jan-2025, PreQC No. AAMOR -25-161673(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Jan-2025, QC No. AAMOR -25-161673; Revised: 22-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. AAMOR -25-161673(R); Published: 29-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.35841/ aamor-9.1.275

Citation: : Cai L. Exploring synthetic lethality and microbiome-cancer interactions: A new frontier in oncology. J Mol Oncol Res. 2025;9(1):275.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Molecular Oncology Research

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, necessitating continuous innovation in therapeutic strategies. Synthetic lethality, a concept rooted in genetic interactions, has emerged as a promising avenue in cancer therapy. Simultaneously, the microbiome’s role in cancer progression and treatment response is gaining attention. Understanding the interplay between synthetic lethality and microbiome-cancer interactions may pave the way for personalized treatment approaches and enhanced therapeutic efficacy [1].

Synthetic lethality occurs when the simultaneous loss of function in two genes leads to cell death, whereas a mutation in only one of these genes is survivable. This principle is exploited in cancer therapy by targeting genetic vulnerabilities unique to cancer cells. One notable example is the use of PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutant cancers, which selectively kill tumor cells while sparing normal tissues. By identifying new synthetic lethal gene pairs, researchers can develop targeted treatments for various cancer types, minimizing systemic toxicity [2].

Advancements in genomic technologies, such as CRISPR-based screening, have expanded our ability to identify novel synthetic lethal interactions. These tools enable the discovery of gene pairs that can be therapeutically exploited in different cancers, including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. Additionally, combining synthetic lethality with immunotherapy and chemotherapy holds promise for overcoming resistance mechanisms and improving patient outcomes [3].

The human microbiome, consisting of trillions of microorganisms, plays a crucial role in maintaining physiological homeostasis. Emerging evidence suggests that microbial communities influence cancer development, progression, and treatment responses. Dysbiosis, an imbalance in the microbiome, has been linked to increased susceptibility to colorectal, gastric, and liver cancers. Understanding how microbial metabolites interact with host cells provides valuable insights into potential therapeutic interventions [4].

Recent studies indicate that the gut microbiome modulates the effectiveness of cancer treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. Specific bacterial species have been shown to enhance or inhibit drug efficacy by affecting immune system activation and drug metabolism. For instance, Bacteroides fragilis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii have been associated with better responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, while others may contribute to resistance mechanisms [5].

The integration of microbiome research with synthetic lethality-based therapies presents an intriguing opportunity. Certain microbial metabolites may influence gene expression in cancer cells, potentially creating novel synthetic lethal interactions. Additionally, gut microbiota may affect DNA repair pathways, altering the effectiveness of synthetic lethal drugs. By harnessing this relationship, researchers can develop microbiome-targeted strategies to enhance the efficacy of synthetic lethality in cancer treatment [6].

Despite promising developments, several challenges must be addressed before synthetic lethality and microbiome-based therapies can be widely adopted. The complexity of microbiome interactions, genetic heterogeneity of tumors, and patient-specific variations complicate treatment predictions. Furthermore, ethical considerations, regulatory approvals, and clinical validation remain significant hurdles for implementing personalized cancer therapies [7, 8].

To overcome these challenges, interdisciplinary research combining oncology, microbiology, and bioinformatics is essential. Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning can aid in identifying patient-specific synthetic lethal interactions influenced by the microbiome. Additionally, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and probiotics may emerge as adjunct therapies to optimize cancer treatment responses [9, 10].

Conclusion

The convergence of synthetic lethality and microbiome-cancer interactions represents a promising frontier in precision oncology. By leveraging genetic vulnerabilities and microbial influences, researchers can develop more effective, personalized cancer treatments. Continued exploration in this field holds the potential to revolutionize cancer therapy, improving patient survival and quality of life. As our understanding of synthetic lethality and the microbiome deepens, their combined therapeutic potential offers exciting possibilities for the future of cancer treatment. Collaborative research and technological advancements will be key in translating these discoveries into clinical practice, ultimately shaping the next generation of oncology therapies.

References

  1. Ibrahim SA, Ayivi RD, Zimmerman T, et al. Lactic acid bacteria as antimicrobial agents: Food safety and microbial food spoilage prevention. Food. 2021;10(12):3131.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Grudlewska-Buda K, Bauza-Kaszewska J, Wiktorczyk-Kapischke N, et al. Antibiotic Resistance in selected emerging bacterial foodborne Pathogens An issue of concern?. Antib. 2023;12(5):880.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Mokoena MP, Omatola CA, Olaniran AO. Applications of lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins against food spoilage microorganisms and foodborne pathogens. Mole. 2021;26(22):7055.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Misiou O, Koutsoumanis K. Climate change and its implications for food safety and spoilage. Trend Food Sci 2022;126:142-52.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Mohanty D, Suar M, Panda SK. Nanotechnological interventions in bacteriocin formulations–advances, and scope for challenging food spoilage bacteria and drug-resistant foodborne pathogens. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023:1-8.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Nisa M, Dar RA, Fomda BA, et al. Combating food spoilage and pathogenic microbes via bacteriocins: A natural and eco-friendly substitute to antibiotics. Food Control. 2023;149:109710.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Wu-Wu JW, Guadamuz-Mayorga C, Oviedo-Cerdas D, et al. Antibiotic resistance and food safety: Perspectives on new technologies and molecules for microbial control in the food industry. Antib. 2023;12(3):550.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. György É, Laslo É, Antal M, et al. Antibiotic resistance pattern of the allochthonous bacteria isolated from commercially available spices. Food Sci Nut. 2021;9(8):4550-60.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Sivalingam KM, Sama DS, Vaithilingam S. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of foodborne bacterial pathogens isolated from spoiled vegetables at Wolaita Sodo town, South Ethiopia. Journal of Food Quality. 2024;2024(1):8823056.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Stanley D, Batacan Jr R, Bajagai YS. Rapid growth of antimicrobial resistance: the role of agriculture in the problem and the solutions. Appl Microb Biotech. 2022;106(21):6953-62.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App