Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Short Communication - Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation (2023) Volume 7, Issue 3

Comparative legal aspects of pollution: Understanding the global landscape

Aishah Zikri*

Department of Environmental Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

Corresponding Author:
Aishah Zikri
Department of Environmental Engineering
University Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
E-mail: zikri@aisha.edu.my

Received: 25-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. AAERAR-23-90468; Editor assigned: 27-Feb-2023, PreQC No. AAERAR-23-90468(PQ); Reviewed: 14-Mar-2023, QC No. AAERAR-23-90468; Revised: 20-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. AAERAR-23-90468(R); Published: 27-Mar-2023, DOI:10.35841/2529-8046-7.3.171

Citation: Zikri A. Comparative legal aspects of pollution: Understanding the global landscape. Environ Risk Assess Remediat. 2023;7(3):171

Visit for more related articles at Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation


Pollution is a major environmental issue that affects people and ecosystems around the world. It can take many forms, including air, water, and soil pollution, and can be caused by a wide range of human activities, from industrial processes to transportation to waste disposal. While many countries have implemented laws and regulations to address pollution, the legal landscape can vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. In this article, we will explore the comparative legal aspects of pollution, with a focus on how different countries are addressing this important issue [1].

Legal Frameworks for Pollution Control

In many countries, pollution control is governed by a range of laws and regulations that are designed to protect human health and the environment. These laws can vary in scope and severity, depending on the type and extent of pollution being addressed. For example, some countries have established specific regulations for air pollution, such as limits on emissions from industrial sources, while others have more comprehensive frameworks that address multiple types of pollution. One common legal approach to pollution control is the use of permits and standards. Under this approach, companies and other entities that generate pollution are required to obtain permits from regulatory agencies, which specify the types and levels of pollutants that can be emitted. In addition, many countries establish environmental standards for air and water quality, which are designed to protect human health and the environment [2].

Another important aspect of pollution control is liability and enforcement. In many countries, companies and individuals can be held legally responsible for pollution they generate, and may be subject to fines, penalties, or other sanctions. Additionally, many countries have established regulatory agencies that are responsible for monitoring and enforcing pollution regulations.

Comparative analysis of Pollution Control Laws

Despite the global nature of pollution, the legal frameworks for pollution control can vary widely from one country to another. In some cases, this variation reflects differences in the severity of pollution problems or the capacity of regulatory agencies to enforce environmental regulations. In other cases, it may reflect differences in political priorities or cultural attitudes toward the environment [3].

One example of this variation can be seen in the European Union, which has established a comprehensive framework for environmental protection. Under this framework, the EU has established strict regulations for air and water quality, as well as waste management and biodiversity conservation. In addition, the EU has established a system of environmental liability that can hold companies and individuals responsible for environmental damage. In contrast, pollution control in developing countries may be less stringent due to a lack of resources or political will. For example, in many African countries, pollution control laws may be limited in scope or poorly enforced, leading to widespread pollution of air and water resources. Similarly, in some countries, such as China and India, rapid economic growth has led to high levels of pollution, with regulatory agencies struggling to keep pace with the expansion of industry and transportation [4].

Pollution is a major global issue that affects the health and well-being of millions of people. From air pollution caused by industrial emissions to water pollution caused by agricultural runoff, the impact of pollution can be devastating. In response to this issue, many countries have implemented legal frameworks to regulate and mitigate pollution. However, the approaches taken by different countries can vary significantly. In this article, we will explore the comparative legal aspects of pollution, examining how different countries tackle this issue.


Pollution is a global issue that affects people and ecosystems around the world. While many countries have established legal frameworks for pollution control, the nature and scope of these frameworks can vary widely. This can reflect differences in political priorities, cultural attitudes, or the severity of pollution problems. Nonetheless, by understanding the comparative legal aspects of pollution, we can work toward more effective strategies for addressing this important issue and protecting the environment for future generations [5].


  1. Sexton K, Linder SH, Marko D, et al. Comparative assessment of air pollution–related health risks in Houston. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007;115(10):1388-93.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Liu Z, Mao X, Tu J, Jaccard M. A comparative assessment of economic-incentive and command-and-control instruments for air pollution and CO2 control in China's iron and steel sector. J Environ Manage. 2014;144:135-42.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Abrams JY, Klein M, Henneman LR, et al. Impact of air pollution control policies on cardiorespiratory emergency department visits, Atlanta, GA, 1999–2013. Environ Int. 2019;126:627-34.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Gangwar C, Choudhari R, Chauhan A, et al. Assessment of air pollution caused by illegal e-waste burning to evaluate the human health risk. Environ  Int. 2019;125:191-9.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Cranor CF. Some legal implications of the Precautionary Principle: Improving information-generation and legal protections. HERA. 2005;11(1):29-52.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App