Archives of General Internal Medicine

Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Perspective - Archives of General Internal Medicine (2025) Volume 9, Issue 4

Community health: Equity, access, impact

Daniel Kim*

Department of Hospital Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

*Corresponding Author:
Daniel Kim
Department of Hospital Medicine
Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
E-mail: daniel.kim@snu.ac.kr

Received : 01-Oct-2025, Manuscript No. aaagim-304; Editor assigned : 03-Oct-2025, PreQC No. aaagim-304(PQ); Reviewed : 23-Oct-2025, QC No aaagim-304; Revised : 03-Nov-2025, Manuscript No. aaagim-304(R); Published : 12-Nov-2025 , DOI : 10.35841/aaagim-9.4.304

Citation: Kim D. Community health: Equity, access, impact. aaagim. 2025;09(04):304.

Visit for more related articles at Archives of General Internal Medicine

Introduction

Digital health interventions offer promising ways to support older adults living in the community, helping them manage their health and improve quality of life. What this really means is leveraging technology can make a real difference in how we care for our aging population outside of traditional hospital settings, emphasizing independence and access to care [1].

Community Health Workers (CHWs) are crucial for bridging gaps in health equity and improving access to care, especially for underserved populations. Here's the thing, these frontline workers genuinely connect people with the resources they need, making health services more reachable and culturally appropriate [2].

Delivering effective community-based mental health services in low- and middle-income countries is both challenging and essential. What this really means is we need innovative, localized approaches to mental healthcare that extend beyond traditional institutional settings, focusing on accessibility and cultural relevance [3].

Community-based programs are effective in managing chronic diseases, showing improvements in patient outcomes. Let's break it down: getting support and education right where people live helps them better cope with long-term conditions, reducing hospital visits and improving overall health [4].

School-based health promotion interventions significantly improve health behaviors among adolescents. This means that schools are powerful settings for shaping positive health habits early on, impacting everything from nutrition to physical activity and mental well-being within the broader community [5].

Community engagement played a vital role in the global COVID-19 response, impacting public health outcomes. Here's the thing: when communities are actively involved in health initiatives, compliance with measures improves, and interventions become more effective and sustainable, especially during a crisis [6].

Interventions in community medicine increasingly target the social determinants of health to achieve better health equity. What this really means is that going beyond clinical care to address factors like housing, food security, and education is essential for truly improving community health outcomes and reducing disparities [7].

Community-based interventions are highly effective in boosting vaccine uptake. Let's break it down: tailoring vaccination efforts to local contexts, involving trusted community leaders, and addressing specific concerns where people live makes a significant difference in achieving higher immunization rates [8].

Effective integration of primary care and public health is critical for holistic community health. What this really means is that when doctors' offices and public health initiatives work together, we get a more comprehensive approach to health, focusing on both individual care and broader population well-being [9].

Community-based nutrition interventions can significantly improve dietary intake and various health outcomes in adults. Here's the thing, providing nutritional guidance and support within familiar community settings helps people adopt healthier eating habits, leading to tangible health benefits [10].

 

Conclusion

The landscape of community health interventions is diverse and impactful, consistently demonstrating the power of localized, accessible approaches to improve well-being. What this really means is that leveraging technology, like digital health tools, can make a real difference in how we care for our aging population, supporting their independence and access to care. Here's the thing, frontline workers, particularly Community Health Workers (CHWs), are crucial for bridging gaps in health equity, ensuring underserved populations connect with essential resources and culturally appropriate health services. These efforts extend to managing chronic diseases effectively right where people live, reducing hospital visits and improving overall health. Across the board, community-based programs show their strength, from delivering effective mental health services in low- and middle-income countries through innovative and culturally relevant strategies, to boosting vaccine uptake by tailoring efforts to local contexts and involving trusted community leaders. Schools also emerge as powerful settings for health promotion, significantly shaping positive health behaviors in adolescents regarding nutrition, physical activity, and mental well-being. Beyond specific programs, active community engagement is vital, enhancing compliance and sustainability of interventions, especially during crises like COVID-19. Furthermore, addressing social determinants of health—factors like housing and food security—is increasingly central to community medicine, ensuring that interventions go beyond clinical care to reduce disparities. Effective integration of primary care and public health is critical for a holistic approach to community health. Lastly, community-based nutrition interventions provide guidance and support in familiar settings, leading to tangible health benefits and improved dietary intake in adults.

References

  1. Hao Y, Han M, Tian T. Digital health interventions for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023;78(6):1047-1060.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Sarah KM, Jessica LW, Kristin PR. The Impact of Community Health Workers on Health Equity and Access to Care: A Scoping Review. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(2):573-597.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Vikram P, Charlotte H, Ricardo A. Community-Based Mental Health Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(6):384-394.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Jianhong C, Tingting L, Yuanyuan Z. Community-based interventions for chronic disease management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):922.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Jihyun L, Hyunjoo K, Mi-Kyung K. The effectiveness of school-based health promotion interventions in improving health behaviors among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2021;145:106450.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Tadesse MA, Temesgen YA, Adane KA. Community engagement in COVID-19 response: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):506.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Laura AS, Lisa MQ, Sara JS. Addressing social determinants of health in community medicine: A scoping review of interventions. J Community Health. 2023;48(3):477-492.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Sarah QA, Abdulaziz BS, Abdullah A. Effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase vaccine uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10(9):1404.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Jessica MH, Megan ES, Jennifer MG. Integrating primary care and public health: A systematic review of models and frameworks. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021;2:100067.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Sarah JM, Eleanor AC, Kylie B. Effectiveness of community-based nutrition interventions for improving dietary intake and health outcomes in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2020;21(7):e12999.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Get the App