Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Short Communication - Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation (2023) Volume 7, Issue 1

A new method for turning hazardous waste into useful goods

Saberio Felici*

Department of Hazardous Waste, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

*Corresponding Author:
Saberio Felici
Department of Hazardous Waste
University of Florence
Florence, Italy
E-mail: sabfel@unifi.it

Received: 01-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. AAERAR-23-85511; Editor assigned: 02-Jan-2023, PreQC No. AAERAR-23-85511(PQ); Reviewed: 16-Jan-2023, QC No. AAERAR-23-85511; Revised: 20-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. AAERAR-23-85511(R); Published: 27-Jan-2023, DOI: 10.35841/2529-8046-7.1.161

Citation: Felici S. A new method for turning hazardous waste into useful goods. Environ Risk Assess Remediat. 2023;7(1):161.


Visit for more related articles at Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation

Any individual who has at any point wavered before a garbage can knows the issue: It's difficult to figure out what can be reused. Consider the typical potato chip sack. It has film plastic, metal, color, and food build up; it's convoluted. The present reusing doesn't deal with intricacy well, so the common chip sack is bound for the landfill. Landfills occupy room, obviously, however there is a substantially more difficult issue related with them one that was highlighted for Daniel R. Cohn, presently a MIT Energy Drive (MITEI) research researcher, when he was the chief overseer of MITEI's Eventual fate of Petroleum gas study. That issue is ozone depleting substance outflows [1].

Around 130 million tons of waste each year go into landfills in the U.S., and that produces no less than 130 million tons of CO2-identical discharges," Cohn says, taking note of that the greater part of these emanations come as methane, a normally happening gas that is a lot of more regrettable for the environment than carbon dioxide (CO2). The cycle is more costly than tossing junk in a landfill, notwithstanding, and environmental change contemplations weren't a significant driver of venture a long time back. "Back in the mid '90s, a worldwide temperature alteration was a greater amount of a scholarly pursuit, says In EnTec president, Chief, and fellow benefactor Jeffrey E. Surma, adding that many individuals at the time didn't put stock in the peculiarity [2].

Subsequently, for a long time the organization focused on giving specialty administrations to weighty enterprises and legislatures with serious harmful material issues. Presently, notwithstanding, Surma says the organization is extending with projects that incorporate plastics reusing and minimal expense disseminated hydrogen fuel creation utilizing progressed forms of their center advancements to keep squander out of landfills and ozone depleting substances out of the air. Individuals today comprehend that decarbonisation of our energy and modern framework needs to happen, says Surma. Redirecting one ton of civil strong waste from landfills is same at the very least" to keeping one ton of CO2 from arriving at the environment, he notes. It's extremely critical.

A few organizations currently make savvy squander containers that offer many capabilities. Many incorporate sensors that distinguish garbage levels so they can alarm clients when they're full. This data can assist with peopling track their removal propensities and upgrade junk pickup plans, lessening fuel utilization. A portion of these garbage bins have intuitive screens to direct clients toward better waste administration. They can advise individuals how to discard various things or convey the ecological effect of some garbage. Like that, clients can turn out to be more aware of what they discard [3].

Most urban communities and neighbourhoods depend on petroleum derivative fuelled trucks to get their garbage. This framework can be wasteful and prompts emanations, so a few regions have taken on another methodology. They use vacuum pull to discharge trash containers through an organization of underground pneumatic cylinders. Pneumatic cylinders are fuelled via air blowers, so their energy utilization is negligible. Since there are no trucks included, ozone harming substance emanations aren't a worry any longer, by the same token. These frameworks are likewise quicker than conventional removal techniques; giving burn through administration establishes additional opportunity to sort junk [4].

Botches in squander arranging can prompt ill-advised removal and botched chances to reuse or reuse materials. Less than 1% of waste is checked, which makes these mistakes likely. Notwithstanding, manual observing is wasteful and costly. Computerized reasoning gives an answer. Computer based intelligence applications like machine vision can assist robotized frameworks with separating between various types of waste. They can then sort it all the more successfully and give experiences into regions removal rehearses. Organizations can then guarantee they're reusing everything they can and keep away from earth dangerous mix-ups [5].


  1. Duan H, Huang Q, Wang Q, et al. Hazardous waste generation and management in China: A review. J Hazard Mater. 2008;158(2-3):221-7.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Chaiyarit J, Intarasaksit P. Household hazardous waste characterization and quantification at source in Thailand. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021;71(8):989-94.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Schaefer ME. Hazardous waste management. dental clinics of North America. 1991;35(2):383-90.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Atthirawong W, Luangpaiboon P. Hazardous waste management system for Thailand’s local administrative organization via route and location selection. J Air Waste Manag. 2022;72(10):1121-36.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Johnson BL. A review of the effects of hazardous waste on reproductive health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(1):S12-6.
  10. Indexed at,Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App