Journal of Pain Management and Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Journal of Pain Management and Therapy (2023) Volume 7, Issue 6

A commentary note on pediatric trauma radiology.

Monika Jain*

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

*Corresponding Author:
Riordan Steven
Department of Pediatric Surgery
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, India

Received:02-Nov-2023,Manuscript No. AAPMT-23-119448; Editor assigned: 04-Nov-2023, PreQC No. AAPMT-23-119448(PQ); Reviewed:18-Nov-2023, QC No. AAPMT-23-119448; Revised:23-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. AAPMT-23-119448(R); Published:30-Nov-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aapmt- 7.6.180

Citation: Jain M. A commentary note on pediatric trauma radiology. J Pain Manage Ther. 2023;7(6):180

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Pain Management and Therapy


Pediatric trauma radiology plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of traumatic injuries in children. Children are susceptible to various forms of trauma, ranging from minor falls to severe accidents, and healthcare professionals rely on radiological imaging to assess the extent of injuries, guide treatment decisions, and ensure the well-being of young patients. In this article, we will explore the significance of pediatric trauma radiology, its techniques and challenges, and how it contributes to improving the care and outcomes of injured children. Trauma in pediatric patients, defined as individuals under the age of 18, can encompass a wide spectrum of injuries. It may include falls, motor vehicle accidents, sports-related incidents, and even non-accidental injuries such as child abuse[1].

Unlike adults, children's bodies are constantly growing and developing, which results in distinct anatomical and physiological differences. These differences necessitate specialized approaches to pediatric trauma radiology, ensuring accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment plans for injured children. Radiological imaging techniques are pivotal in assessing pediatric trauma, and they offer various modalities to visualize different types of injuries. Among the most commonly used techniques are X-rays, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)[2].

X-rays, often the initial imaging modality used in trauma cases, are effective in identifying fractures, dislocations, and certain soft tissue injuries. They are quick, readily available, and relatively low in radiation exposure, making them suitable for pediatric patients. However, the interpretation of pediatric X-rays requires specific knowledge of pediatric anatomy and the ability to differentiate normal growth-related changes from injuries. CT scans provide detailed images of the internal structures of the body, making them invaluable for assessing the extent of injuries, especially in cases where there is suspicion of internal bleeding or organ damage[3].

CT scans may require the use of contrast agents, and while they provide essential information, they expose the child to higher levels of radiation than X-rays. Radiologists must carefully consider the risk-benefit ratio when opting for CT scans in pediatric trauma cases, as children are more susceptible to the harmful effects of ionizing radiation. MRI is less commonly used in acute trauma situations, primarily due to its time-consuming nature and the need for patient cooperation. However, it excels in evaluating soft tissue injuries, ligament and tendon injuries, and detecting subtle fractures that might not be visible on X-rays or CT scans. When pediatric trauma cases involve potential spinal cord injuries or suspected ligamentous injuries, MRI can be a valuable tool for diagnosis and treatment planning. The role of pediatric radiologists in trauma cases is pivotal. These specialists possess the expertise to interpret imaging studies accurately and provide valuable insights to the healthcare team. Understanding the unique aspects of pediatric anatomy and physiology is essential for radiologists in this field, as it helps them distinguish normal variations from pathological findings[4].

One of the key challenges in pediatric trauma radiology is the need to minimize radiation exposure. Children's developing tissues are more sensitive to ionizing radiation, and cumulative exposure can increase the risk of long-term health effects. Radiologists must employ the "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) principle, optimizing imaging protocols to obtain the necessary diagnostic information while minimizing radiation exposure. Technological advances have enabled the development of low-dose protocols for both X-rays and CT scans, reducing radiation exposure without compromising diagnostic accuracy[5].

Moreover, radiologists must consider the appropriateness of imaging, ensuring that the benefits of the study outweigh the potential risks of radiation exposure. This involves a careful clinical assessment to determine the necessity of each imaging study, weighing the potential risks against the diagnostic benefits. In addition to radiation exposure, the sedation and anesthesia of pediatric patients for imaging studies present another challenge in pediatric trauma radiology. Young children may not cooperate or remain still during imaging procedures, necessitating sedation or anesthesia to ensure safety and image quality[6].

Anesthesia carries inherent risks, and the choice to use it should be made judiciously, considering the individual patient's clinical condition and the necessity of the procedure. Another consideration in pediatric trauma radiology is the emotional and psychological impact of the imaging process on the child and their family. Medical procedures can be distressing, especially for young patients, and pediatric radiologists and technologists must employ techniques to minimize anxiety and discomfort. Child-friendly environments, skilled communication, and distraction techniques are crucial to creating a positive experience during imaging. Pediatric trauma radiology also plays a critical role in the identification of non-accidental injuries, such as child abuse. Radiological findings can be instrumental in detecting signs of abuse, including fractures in various stages of healing, skeletal injuries inconsistent with the reported mechanism of injury, and soft tissue injuries[7].

Radiologists must work closely with child protection teams and law enforcement to ensure the safety of the child and gather evidence if abuse is suspected. The collaborative nature of pediatric trauma radiology is a central aspect of its success. A multidisciplinary approach involves pediatric radiologists, emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, paediatricians, and nurses working together to provide comprehensive care for injured children. Effective communication and the exchange of information are crucial in managing pediatric trauma cases, ensuring that all team members are on the same page regarding the child's diagnosis and treatment plan. Interpreting pediatric trauma imaging studies requires an understanding of the unique aspects of pediatric anatomy and developmental variations[8].

Children's bones are different from adults in many ways. Their bones are more elastic, and fractures may present differently, often with subtle findings that require a skilled eye to recognize. Additionally, the growth plates present in developing bones are susceptible to injury, and their evaluation is crucial for proper management. Understanding pediatric brain imaging is another essential aspect of pediatric trauma radiology. Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a significant concern in pediatric trauma cases. Radiologists must be well-versed in interpreting head CT scans and MRIs to identify signs of intracranial bleeding, skull fractures, and other brain injuries. Early detection and intervention in TBI cases are critical for preventing long-term complications[9].

Abdominal injuries are also a common concern in pediatric trauma. Radiologists must be proficient in evaluating abdominal CT scans to identify injuries to the liver, spleen, intestines, and other abdominal organs. In cases of suspected internal bleeding, prompt diagnosis is essential to guide surgical interventions if necessary. Furthermore, pediatric trauma radiologists must consider the potential for injuries to other vital organs, such as the heart, lungs, and kidneys. While these injuries may be less common, their impact on a child's health can be profound. The ability to recognize and assess these injuries is crucial for guiding treatment decisions[10].


Pediatric trauma radiology is a specialized field of medical imaging that plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of traumatic injuries in children. The unique anatomical and physiological characteristics of pediatric patients require a specialized approach to imaging and interpretation. Pediatric radiologists, in collaboration with a multidisciplinary healthcare team, work to ensure accurate diagnoses while minimizing radiation exposure and the emotional impact on young patients. The challenges of pediatric trauma radiology include radiation exposure, sedation and anesthesia, and the emotional impact on children and their families. Radiologists must prioritize the safety and well-being of the child while providing essential diagnostic information to guide treatment decisions. Through their expertise in pediatric anatomy and developmental variations, pediatric radiologists are instrumental in identifying fractures, soft tissue injuries, head injuries, abdominal injuries, and other traumatic conditions. Their knowledge and skill contribute to the overall success of pediatric trauma care, ensuring that injured children receive the best possible treatment and support on their road to recovery.


  1. Cunningham RM, Walton MA, Carter PM. The major causes of death in children and adolescents in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2468-75.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Milas ZL, Milner R, Chaikoff E, et al. Endograft stenting in the adolescent population for traumatic aortic injuries. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(5):e27-30.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Miele V, Piccolo CL, Trinci M, et al. Diagnostic imaging of blunt abdominal trauma in pediatric patients. Radiol Med. 2016;121:409-30.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Gates RL, Price M, Cameron DB, et al. Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in children: An American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(8):1519-26.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Gurunluoglu K, Y?ld?r?m IO, Kutlu R, et al. Advantages of early intervention with arterial embolization for intra-abdominal solid organ injuries in children. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25(4):310.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Marine MB, Corea D, Steenburg SD, et al. Is the new ACR-SPR practice guideline for addition of oblique views of the ribs to the skeletal survey for child abuse justified? Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(4):868-71.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Zarella C, Didier R, Bergquist C, et al. A reduction in radiation exposure during pediatric craniofacial computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(2):331-3.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Mandelstam SA, Cook D, Fitzgerald M, et al. Complementary use of radiological skeletal survey and bone scintigraphy in detection of bony injuries in suspected child abuse. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(5):387-90.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Kleinman PK, Marks Jr SC. Relationship of the subperiosteal bone collar to metaphyseal lesions in abused infants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(10):1471-6.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Snedecor ST, Wilson HB. Some obstetrical injuries to the long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;31(2):378-84.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App