Aortic and heart dimensions of children and adolescents in a Nigerian popu-lation.
- *Corresponding Author:
- Anyanwu GE
Departments of Anatomy
College of Medicine
University of Nigeria Enugu Campus
E-mail: [email protected]
Accepted date: December 27 2009
There is a paucity of data on aortic and heart dimensions of children and adolescents in Afri-cans. The aim of our study was to establish normal values of aortic, cardiac and thoracic diame-ters, and the cardiothoraic ratio in children and adolescents in a Nigerian population. The car-diothoracic ratio of 110 males and females aged between 5 and 19 were calculated from the car-diac and thoracic diameters in posteroanterior chest radiographs in a cross sectional study at a tertiary hospital. Prediction formulae were established for aortic and cardiac diameters. The means and standard deviations of aortic, cardiac and thoracic diameters and cardiothoraic ra-tio were established. The mean values of cardiothoracic ratio for males in the 5-9, 10-14 and 15-19 age groups were 47.7%, 45.7% and 44.1% respectively. The corresponding values for fe-males were 49.7%, 45.0% and 45.1%. The ratio decreased with age in both sexes. These values were larger than those reported for the Caucasians. Our study highlights the need for the use of standards based on local values for the evaluation of cardiovascular diseases in our population
Aortic diameter, cardiothoracic ratio, children and adolescents, Nigerians
Chest radiography is the most commonly used modality for the detection of cardiomegaly and the evaluation of cardio-thoracic ratio . It is an important indicator of cardiac size . Danzer  was the first to describe the cardiothoracic ratio. Ever since he defined it, there have been several stud-ies on the topic. Opinions differ on its usefulness. The car-diothoracic ratio and the relative heart volume have been used as proxy measures of left ventricular mass .
The cardiothoracic ratio is affected by such factors as age, phase of respiration, body posture, physique, altitude and race. Kerwin  was the first to suggest that racial differences may affect the cardiac size. Ashcroft and Mial  noted a higher cardiothoracic ratio in blacks than in whites. Nickol and Wade  observed that athletes tended to have a larger heart than the general population because of the normal physiological dilatation of the heart.
Most of the studies on heart dimensions have been on Cau-casians. There is a paucity of studies on heart dimensions in African children and adolescence. Odita et al. studied the cardiothoracic ratio in Nigerian newborn infants. Our study was aimed at establishing normal values of aortic, cardiac and thoracic diameters, and cardiothoracic ratio in frontal chest radiographs in children and adolescents. These values are necessary for a better and more accurate evalua-tion of cardiovascular diseases.
Materials and Methods
The subjects studied were individuals referred to the De-partment of Radiation Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) Enugu for routine chest ra-diographs. The blood pressure, heights and weights of sub-jects in the 10-14 and 15-19 year-old groups were meas-ured. The focus film distance was 2 metres. At this distance projection distortion is minimal and the magnification is about 5% . The subject stood erect and the central rays were perpendicular to the plane of the film and centred on the 4th thoracic vertebra. The films were anteroposterior views and they were taken in full inspiration. Films that did not meet the criteria normality formulated by Kabala and Wilde  and Brockington and Bohrer  were excluded from the study .
The cardiac and thoracic diameters were measured by the Ungerleider and Gubner  method. The cardiac diameter was the sum of the maximum extensions of the heart to the left and right of the midline. The thoracic diameter was measured from the internal surfaces of the ribs above the costal attachments of the diaphragm at the point where the chest diameter was greatest (Fig. 1). The cardiothoracic ra-tio was calculated from the cardiac and thoracic diameters. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 6.0 for Win-dows was used for statistical analysis.
There were 60 males and 50 females in the study. There ages ranged from 5 to 19. Table 1 shows that, in both sexes, the aortic diameter increased with age. There was no sig-nificant sex difference in the aortic diameter. The correlation coefficients between the real and predicted val-ues of aortic diameter were significant in both sexes, p< 0.001.
Predicted aortic diameter (cm) of 10-19 year-old males = 0.005 x age + 0.013 x weight + 0.021 x height + 0.592.
Predicted aortic diameter (cm) of 10-19 year-old females = 0.042 x age - 0.001 x weight + 0.020 x height + 1.005.
The correlation coefficients between the real and pre dicted values were as follows:
10-19 year-old males: r = 0.7898, p< 0.001
10-19 year-old females: r = 0.6913, p< 0.001
Table 2 shows that the cardiac diameter increased with age in both sexes. In males, the increase was statistically sig-nificant at all age groups, p <0.01. There was no signifi-cant sex difference in the 5-9 and 10-14 age groups whereas in the 15-19 age group, males had significantly larger mean cardiac diameter than females. Using age, weight and height as variables, formulas were established for the prediction of cardiac diameter in males and females. Correlation coeffi-cients between the real and predicted values were statisti-cally significant in both sexes p<0.001.
Predicted formulas for the cardiac diameter and the cor-relation between the real and predicted values were also calculated.
Predicted cardiac diameter (cm) of 10-19 year-old males:
= 0.060 x age + 0.040 x weight + 0.021 x height + 5.734.
Predicted cardiac diameter (cm) of 10-19 year-old fe-males:
= 0.224 x age + 0.007 x weight - 0.029 x height + 12.306.
The correlation coefficients between the real and pre-dicted values were as follows:
10-19 year-old males: r = 0.7798, p< 0.001
10-19 year-old females: r = 0.6746, p< 0.001
As highlighted in table 3, the males in the 5-9 year-old age group had larger mean thoracic diameter than the females of corresponding age, but the difference was not significant. The reverse was the case in the 14-19 year-old age group. In the 15-19 year age group, the males had significantly larger thoracic diameter than the females, p<0.001.
Table 4 shows that in both sexes the cardiothoracic ratio decreased with age and that there was no significant differ-ence in the mean values of males and females.
In our study, the cardiothoracic ratio decreased with age. The mean values for males in the 5-9, 10-14 and 15-19 age groups were 47.7%, 45.7% and 44.1% respectively. The corresponding values for females were 49.7%, 45.0% and 45.1%. Cowan  in a study of the British noted a mean cardiothoracic ratio of 41.6% and 42.7% in the 19 year-old males and females respectively. For the 14 year-old, his values were 42.6% for males and 43.4% for females while for the 9 year-old the values were 45.1% and 46.4% respec-tively. The males and females in our study had larger car-diothoracic ratio than the values reported by Cowan  at the corresponding age groups. Many authors have made similar observations in the adult populations. Ashcroft and Miall  comparing the radiographic measurements made in Wales and Jamaica, attributed the greater cardiothoracic ratio in Africans to a smaller thoracic diameter rather than to a larger cardiac diameter. Although Munro-Faure et al. noted a smaller thoracic diameter in Africans, they attrib-uted the greater cardiothoracic ratio primarily to a larger cardiac diameter and secondarily to a smaller thoracic di-ameter. Eveleth and Tanner  showed that African-American boys and girls have considerably narrower hips relative to shoulders than their British or Chinese counter-parts. It is possible that the shorter trunk of Africans cou-pled with their narrower hips may partly account for the differences in the body physique between Africans and Caucasians or Asians and consequently of the larger cardio-thoracic ratio in Africans.
It is also known that environmental factors such as poor nutrition and infections may cause cardiac enlargement with resultant increase in the cardiothoracic ratio. The mean val-ues of cardiac diameter in our study was larger than the val-ues reported for the British by Cowan . Nickol and Wade  in a study in adults indicated that Africans tended to have a larger cardiac diameter than Asians or Caucasians. Ashcroft and Mial [l6] indicated that Africans may have a type of phy-sique in which the heart tends to lie more horizontal than is usual in Caucasians. The concept that infections and malnu-trition might be responsible for the larger cardiothoracic ratio of Africans is not valid in our study. Our subjects were well nourished. The peculiar physique of Africans due to environmental and racial factors is probably respon-sible for their larger cardiothoracic ratio.
A number of authors have highlighted the usefulness of the cardiothoracic ratio. Hemingway et al. reported that the ratio predicted the coronary heart disease mortality as good as the relative heart volume. Rautaharju et al  showed that in women, the ratio is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease risk than the cardiac diameter or the electrocardiogram estimate of the left ventricular mass. Both studies indicated that the ratio may still retain its practical utility as an indicator of cardiac abnormality, notwithstan-ding the recent improvements in the echocardiographic and radiographic procedures to estimate the left ventricular and cardiac size. Our study indicates that there are racial differ-rences in heart dimensions. It highlights the need for the use of standards based on local values in the evaluation of cardiovascular diseases in our population.
- Kono T, Suma M, Handa H, Hirota Y, Kawamura K. Clinical significance of normal cardiac silhouette in di-lated cardiomyopathy. Evaluation based upon echocardi-ography and magnetic resonance imaging. Japanese Cir J 1992; 56: 359-365.
- Raphael MJ, Donaldson RM. The normal heart. In: Sutton D, ed. Textbook of Radiology and Medical Imaging. Ed-inburgh: Church Livingstone 1998; 541-562
- Danzer CS. The cardiothoracic ratio. An index of cardiac enlargement. Am J Med Sci 1919; 157: 513-521. Cited by Cowan (1964).
- Rautaharju PM, LaCroix AZ, Savage DD, Haynes SG, Madans JH, Wolf HK, Hadden W, Keller J, Cornoni-Huntley J. Electrocardiographic estimate of left ventricu-lar mass versus radiographic cardiac size and the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in the epidemiologic fol-low-up study of the first national health and nutrition ex-amination survey. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 59-66
- Kerwin AJ. Observations of heart size of natives living at high altitudes. Am. Heart J 1944; 28: 69-80.
- Ashcroft MT, Miall WE. Cardiothoracic ratios in two Jamaican communities. Am J Epidemiol 1969; 89: 161-167.
- Nickol K, Wade AJ. Radiographic heart size and the car-diothoracic ratio in three ethnic groups: a basis for a sim-ple screening test for cardiac enlargement in men. Br J Radiol 1982; 55: 399-403
- Odita JC, Okolo AA, Omene JA. Cardiothoracic ratio in Nigerian newborn infants. Clin Radiol 1987; 38 (2): 187-189.
- Ungerleider HE, Gubner R. Evaluation of heart size measurements. Am. Heart J 1942; 24: 494-510
- Kabala JE, Wilde P. The measurement of the heart size in the anteroposterior chest radiograph. Br J Radiol 1987; 60: 981-986.
- Brockington IF, Bohrer SP. Enlargement of the aortic shadow in Nigerian heart muscle disease. Acta Cardiol 1970; 25: 344-356.
- Cowan NR. The heart lung coefficient and the transverse diameter of the heart. Brit. Heart J 1964; 26: 116-120
- Munro-Faure AD, Beilin LJ, Bulpitt CJ, Coles EC, Doll-ery CT, Gear JSS, Harper G, Johnson BF. Comparison of black and white patients attending hypertension clinics in England. Brit Med J 1979; 1: 1044-1047.
- Eveleth PB, Tanner JM, eds. Worldwide Variation in Human Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1976 p229.
- Hemingway H, Shipley M, Christie D, Marmot M. Cardiothoracic ratio and relative heart volume as predic-tors of coronary heart disease mortality. The Whitehall study 25 years follow-up. Eur. Heart J 1998; 19: 859-869.