Research and Reports in Pulmonology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Opinion Article - Research and Reports in Pulmonology (2025) Volume 6, Issue 1

Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation: Approaches, Tools, and Predictors of Success

Thabo Dijk *

Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

*Corresponding Author:
Thabo Dijk
Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa
E-mail: t.dijk@upretoria.ac.za

Received: 1-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. aarrp-25-168848; Editor assigned: 4-Jan-2025, PreQC No. aarrp-25-168848 (PQ) Reviewed:18-Jan-2025, QC No. aarrp-25-168848 Revised:25-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. aarrp-25-168848; Published:30-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.35841/ aarrp - 6.1.180

Citation: Dijk T. Weaning from mechanical ventilation: Approaches, tools, and predictors of success. Res Rep Pulmonol. 2025;6(1):180

Visit for more related articles at Research and Reports in Pulmonology

Introduction

Weaning patients from mechanical ventilation is a critical phase in intensive care management, representing the transition from dependence on ventilatory support to spontaneous breathing. Successful weaning improves patient outcomes, reduces ICU length of stay, and minimizes ventilator-associated complications [1].

This article discusses the various weaning approaches, assessment tools, and key predictors of weaning success, offering a comprehensive overview to aid clinicians in evidence-based decision-making [2].

Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving intervention for patients with respiratory failure. However, prolonged dependence on ventilatory support can lead to complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, diaphragm atrophy, and increased mortality. Weaning — the gradual reduction and eventual removal of mechanical support — is essential for recovery and discharge. The process must be carefully managed to balance the risks of premature extubation against the harms of prolonged ventilation [3].

Weaning strategies can be broadly categorized into three types: simple, difficult, and prolonged. Most patients fall into the simple category, where weaning is achieved on the first attempt. Difficult and prolonged weaning involve multiple failed attempts and are more common in patients with chronic comorbidities or severe illness [4].

Each approach should be tailored to the patient's respiratory condition, strength, and neurological status.Protocol-based weaning has been shown to reduce weaning time and complications compared to physician-led approaches alone [5].

Conclusion

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a dynamic, patient-specific process that requires careful planning and execution. Utilizing standardized tools, multidisciplinary care, and individualized strategies increases the likelihood of success while reducing complications. As the understanding of respiratory physiology and supportive care evolves, so too does the ability to optimize weaning outcomes across diverse patient populations.

References

  1. Sander JW, Shorvon SD. Epidemiology of the epilepsies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61(5):433.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2008;20.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. Tfos dews II epidemiology report. The ocular surface. 2017;15(3):334-65.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology: Beyond the basics. Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2014.

    5. Google Scholar

  5. Hunter EC, Sierra M, David AS. The epidemiology of depersonalisation and derealisation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39(1):9-18.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App