Research Article - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2021) Volume 5, Issue 10
Universal health coverage index in the poorest region of Iran, Sistan and Baluchestan: 2012-2018.
Azar Abolpur1, Fatemeh Setoodehzadeh2*, Mehdi Zanganeh Baygi3, Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam1, Mohammad Khammarnia3
1Department of Public Health, School of Health, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
2Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
- Corresponding Author:
- Fatemeh Setoodehzadeh
Health Promotion Research Center
Zahedan University of Medical Sciences
Zahedan, Iran
Tel: +989177364693
Email: f.setoodehzadeh@zaums.ac.ir
Accepted date: October 18, 2021
Citation: Fatemeh S. Universal health coverage index in the poorest region of Iran (), Sistan and Baluchestan: 2012-2018. J Public Health Policy Plann 2021; 5(10):89-93.
Abstract
Introduction: Universal health coverage means that all people have access to basic and quality health interventions, including promotion, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation at costs that people can afford. Such coverage is the third goal of the Sustainable Development Goals. Given the importance of the issue and the influential characteristics of Sistan-Baluchestan province on this index, we decided to conduct the first study to achieve a universal health coverage index in this province.
Materials and Methods: The present quantitative study was conducted in 2019 in Sistan and Baluchestan province as a retrospective cohort. In this study, secondary health data were used during a seven-year trend from 2012 to 2018. Data were collected through an information form and analyzed using dispersion center indices, frequency distribution tables, t-test and ANOVA in SPSS 16 software.
Results: The mean general health coverage in Sistan and Baluchestan province was 13%, ranging from 17.1% in Khash city to 6.3% in Sarbaz city. Also, this coverage was significantly different in the cities of the province (P <0.05). In this study, the highest coverage index pertained to vaccination (99.71%) and the lowest coverage pertained to essential drugs (0.006%). Also, the mean percentage of general health coverage before and after the transformation plan and also between 2012 and 2018 showed a statistically significant difference (p <0.002).
Discussion and Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that access to universal health coverage is affected by many factors such as material, physical and human resources, infrastructure, economic, climatic, geographical and cultural conditions of the society. This coverage in Sistan and Baluchestan province was much lower than the national average, which indicates the unfair and inadequate distribution of financial, human and physical resources in this province.
Keywords
Evaluation, Universal health coverage, Service coverage
Introduction
In order to ensure health, which is one of the most important rights of individuals in society, healthcare systems provide services at different levels [1-3]. Therefore, since a healthy society achieves growth, prosperity and economic development, universal health coverage (UHC) is one of the important ways to achieve better health for any healthcare system [4-6]. UHC is a term used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe its proposed strategy for "health for all". UHC recognizes health as a fundamental human right, and is committed to ensuring the highest possible level of health for all. The WHO, in its 1978 Health for All Policy, emphasizes the highest level of access to health services for all. Furthermore, the 2008 report of the WHO emphasized the principle of universal coverage and achieving social indicators of health [7,8]. Thus, world leaders adopted the Sustainable Development Goals in September 2015 with 17 general objectives and 169 sub objectives, the third of which is called adequate health and well-being or achieving UHC [9-13].
UHC is the access of all people to basic and quality health interventions, including promotion, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation at a cost that people can afford. In other words, "it is the only concept of power that has been able to provide public health" and has three basic dimensions of population coverage, service coverage and financial protection [3,11,14-19]. Also, to calculate this coverage, the WHO has considered 16 indicators in 4 categories: 1- Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, 2- Infectious diseases, 3- Non-communicable diseases, and 4- Capacity and access to services. [3,11,14].
In 2012, the United Nations introduced a move, accepted as a political aspiration of all developed and developing countries, towards UHC with the goal of financially accessible and farreaching access to these services [10,13,20]. The level of service coverage varies from 22 to 86 in different countries, with the highest in East Asia, North America and Europe, and the lowest in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Iran, with a score of 65, is ranked 89th in the world (11). UHC in Iran is one of the ultimate goals of the healthcare system and also one of the general health policy clauses announced by the Supreme Leader in 2014. This important necessity has also been emphasized in the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Development Plans, as well as in Article 29 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. some of the reforms implemented in Iran to achieve UHC are as follows: The expansion of healthcare networks in the 1980s, rural insurance and family physician program since 2005, urban family physician program in 2012 and finally Health Transformation Program 4 (HTP), inspired by the experience of Turkey and Thailand in 2014, was designed and approved in four phases [19,21-26].
Considering that UHC is one of the general goals of the Sustainable Development Plan, and that it was declared the slogan of the WHO for two consecutive years of 2018 and 2019, achieving this goal has been very important for all countries including Iran.
Sistan and Baluchestan province has unique features: vastness; high marginalization ratio; lack of facilities in many rural areas such as drinking water piping, gas supply in many parts of the province, proper communication, paved roads, proper and adequate educational facilities; low socio-economic status; high population growth; high unemployment rate; bordering Afghanistan and Pakistan and illegal migration; lack of health facilities; lack of specialized human resources in the field of health and treatment, and distance from the center of the country. Since these features are among the important and effective factors in achieving the goals of UHC, we decided to select this province and conduct the first study to assess the status of public health coverage indicators.
Materials and Methods
The present study aimed to assess UHC index in Sistan and Baluchestan province, compare it among different cities and compare it before and after the transformation plan. This research is a retrospective cohort applied study conducted quantitatively in 2019.
Sistan and Baluchestan province is located in the southeast of Iran, occupying about 11.5% of the country's area. It has 19 cities as well as three universities of medical sciences: Zahedan, Iranshahr and Zabol. As of 2019, 28 hospitals with 3658 active beds and 1439 centers provided primary health care including comprehensive health service centers, health bases, health houses, maternity facilities and border healthcare bases.
After coordination and necessary correspondence with Zahedan, Iranshahr and Zabol universities of medical sciences, the researcher went to the relevant universities. Since secondary data were used by census, the data related to 16 WHO indicators required for calculating UHC were obtained through an information checklist from the studied cities (Iranshahr, Chabahar, Khash, Sarbaz, Zabol, Zahedan, Saravan and Nikshahr) during 2012-2018. Indicators with inadequate or incomplete data were excluded. These data were obtained from all comprehensive healthcare centers of the studied cities from the SIB national health archives system and statistics related to the years before the establishment of the SIB system.
The information checklist used for data collection contained relevant questions that indicated the status of 16 indicators in the cities under study. Indicators include: 1- Reproductive maternal, newborn and child health(family planning, pre- and postnatal care, complete vaccination of children and health measures to prevent pneumonia) 2- Infectious diseases (treatment of tuberculosis, antiviral treatment of HIV, proper hygiene and malaria prevention measures) 3- Non-communicable diseases (prevention and treatment of hypertension, prevention and treatment of diabetes, cervical cancer screening and nonsmoking) 4- Capacity and availability of services (access to hospital services, the ratio of health workers to the defined standard, access to essential medicines and health security (according to the main health regulations). Since our research covered 7 years, only cities that remained unchanged during this period and after the implementation of the transformation plan, i.e. according to the new divisions of the country were included for comparison.
Data were collected and entered into SPSS-16 software for statistical analysis. Dispersion center indices were used to describe quantitative data, frequency distribution table (absolute and relative) was used to describe qualitative data, and t-test and ANOVA were used to compare data. Also, each indicator was calculated using standard formulas defined by the Ministry of Health and WHO [9,27-29].
How to calculate indicators for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health
Percentage of prenatal care coverage: (Mothers who received care ≥4 times during pregnancy / Total number of pregnant mothers × 100)
Complete childhood vaccination index: (number of children who have received three doses of Tdap or pentavalan vaccines in one year / total number of children under one year in that area × 100).
Percentage of family planning coverage: (number of women using modern methods of contraception / all married women aged 15 to 49 × 100).
Pneumonia Prevention Coverage Index: (Number of people receiving pneumonia prevention care / population at risk × 100).
How to calculate the indicators of infectious diseases
HIV treatment coverage: (treatment of HIV-infected people at a specific place and time/ the number of people diagnosed at the same place and time × 100).
Coverage of malaria prevention measures: (measures taken at the time and place / the number of households at risk in that area at the same time × 100).
Success rate for completing TB treatment: (The number of cases of TB who completed treatment /total number of TB cases × 100).
Access to minimum basic health services: (Number of households with sanitary toilets/all household’s × 100 and number of households with safe drinking water/all household’s × 100).
How to calculate non-communicable disease indicators
Percentage of patients with known hypertension or controlled hypertension: (number of patients with controlled hypertension / total number of patients with hypertension × 100).
Percentage of diabetes prevention and treatment: (Number of people with diabetes being treated or controlled / Number of people 30 and older in an area × 100)
Percentage of people who do not smoke: (Number of people who did not smoke in the last three months / Total number of people surveyed × 100)
Percentage of Pap smears performed to screen for cervical cancer: (Number of people screened / married women aged 30- 65 × 100)
How to calculate service capacity and availability indicators
Access to essential medicines: (number of pharmacies / population × 100).
Access to hospital services: These indicators are received from the Vice Chancellor for Treatment of the university.
(Number of hospital beds / mid-year population × 100).
Density of healthcare workers: (Physician ratio: number of physicians per 1000 people, surgeon ratio: number of surgeons per 100,000 and psychiatrist ratio: number of psychiatrists per 100,000)
Health security: (according to international regulations)
UHC was calculated as follows
A: (Pneumonia care coverage × Vaccination coverage × Pregnancy care coverage Family planning coverage) 1/4
B: (TB treatment coverage × AIDS treatment coverage × Malaria prevention measures coverage Minimum health care coverage) 1/4
C: (Blood pressure treatment coverage × Blood sugar treatment coverage × Cervical cancer screening × Non-smoking coverage) 1/4
D: (percentage of hospital bed density × ratio of hospital staff × coverage of access to essential medicines) 1/4
Universal Health Coverage = (A × B × C × D) ¼
Results
According to your Table 1, the percentage of UHC in Sistan and Baluchestan province is 13%, with the highest rate in Khash (17.1%) and the lowest in Sarbaz (6.3%). Furthermore, the highest index pertained to vaccination coverage in Iranshahr (103%) and Khash (101%), non-smoking coverage in Khash (99.09%) and Nikshahr (96.95%) and the lowest coverage pertained to essential medicines in Sarbaz city (0.0024%) and Nikshahr (0.0031%), and staff coverage in Sarbaz city (0.64%) and Saravan (0.71%).
nikshahr |
Sarbaz |
Iranshahr |
Chabahar |
Zabol |
Khash |
Saravan |
Zahedan |
Sistan and Baluchestan |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.20 |
6.32 |
7.80 |
7.60 |
8.33 |
17.10 |
9.30 |
7.30 |
13.00 |
UHC |
23.33 |
20.22 |
27.92 |
28.6 |
33.87 |
35.29 |
20.28 |
53.9 |
30.43 |
family planning coverage |
3.57 |
9.28 |
3.57 |
11.43 |
5.93 |
99.85 |
.0043 |
0.0043 |
16.8 |
Pneumonia Prevention Coverage |
84.07 |
84.9 |
84.54 |
87.01 |
88.42 |
99.85 |
90.98 |
86.33 |
88.28 |
TB Treatment coverage |
99.28 |
99.85 |
103 |
100 |
101 |
95.42 |
98.4 |
101 |
99.71 |
Vaccination coverage |
64.92 |
63.68 |
62.22 |
62.42 |
82.18 |
78.62 |
71.09 |
44.68 |
66.23 |
prenatal care coverage |
30.58 |
31.29 |
24.87 |
26.38 |
99.85 |
71.28 |
75.21 |
17.87 |
47.2 |
HIV treatment coverage |
30 |
26.42 |
12 |
26.14 |
0.043 |
19.28 |
26.04 |
7.28 |
18.39 |
Coverage of malaria prevention measures |
79.42 |
77.4 |
85.74 |
49.53 |
89.99 |
80.62 |
92.37 |
85.92 |
80.12 |
Proper health coverage |
5.83 |
5.25 |
4.99 |
2.6 |
5.91 |
77.96 |
16.88 |
12.24 |
16.46 |
Blood pressure treatment coverage |
1.79 |
2.49 |
2.26 |
1.62 |
3.63 |
33.77 |
38.77 |
14.52 |
12.36 |
Blood sugar treatment coverage |
2.85 |
1.04 |
6 |
7.64 |
11.11 |
5.85 |
16.4 |
4.6 |
6.91 |
Cervical cancer screening coverage |
96.95 |
95.5 |
94.5 |
95.5 |
90.5 |
99.09 |
96.8 |
96.1 |
95.98 |
No smoking |
5.57 |
2.42 |
12.85 |
6.08 |
25.66 |
90.86 |
98.01 |
74.78 |
39.53 |
Active hospital bed coverage per thousand population |
0.0031 |
0.0024 |
0.0063 |
0.0043 |
0.013 |
0.004 |
0.006 |
0.01 |
0.0061 |
Coverage of essential medicines |
1.20 |
0.64 |
0.69 |
0.84 |
1.61 |
0.55 |
0.71 |
1.05 |
0.92 |
*Average staff coverage |
Table 1. Percentage of UHC and its indicators by city.
According to Table 2, among the 16 indicators required to calculate UHC in this province, the highest coverage pertained to the mean indicators of vaccination (99.71 ± 0.46%), nonsmoking (95.46 ± 0.46%) and tuberculosis treatment (1.11%). 86.33%) and the lowest coverage pertained to the mean cervical cancer screening indicator (6.91 ± 1.00%), staff coverage (0.065 ± 0.92%) and essential drugs (0.0005 ± 0.0061%).
Variable |
Number |
Standard deviation ± mean |
Middle |
Lowest |
Highest |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
family planning coverage |
56 |
30.43±1.67 |
29.81 |
27.08 |
33.76 |
Pneumonia Prevention Coverage |
56 |
16.72±4.32 |
5 |
8/06 |
25.38 |
TB Treatment coverage |
56 |
88.28±1.11 |
89.5 |
86.05 |
90.51 |
Vaccination coverage |
56 |
99.71±0.52 |
100 |
98.67 |
100 |
prenatal care coverage |
56 |
66.23±2.04 |
65.20 |
62.13 |
70.32 |
HIV treatment coverage |
56 |
47.20±4.91 |
39.77 |
37.34 |
57.05 |
Coverage of malaria prevention measures |
56 |
18.39±2.5 |
10.30 |
13.38 |
23.41 |
Proper health coverage |
56 |
80.12±1.74 |
82.51 |
76.64 |
83.60 |
Blood pressure treatment coverage |
56 |
16.46±3.26 |
6.34 |
9.91 |
23.00 |
Blood sugar treatment coverage |
56 |
12.36±2.14 |
3.18 |
8.07 |
16.65 |
Cervical cancer screening coverage |
56 |
6.92±1.00 |
6.26 |
4.90 |
8.92 |
No smoking |
23 |
95.98±0.46 |
96.1 |
95.01 |
96.94 |
Active hospital bed coverage per thousand population |
56 |
39.53±5.27 |
16.31 |
28.97 |
50.09 |
Coverage of essential medicines |
56 |
0.0062±0.0005 |
0.0052 |
0.0052 |
0.0071 |
* Average staff coverage |
56 |
0.92±0.065 |
0.88 |
0.79 |
1.05 |
Table 2. Description of the indicators for UHC percentage in Sistan and Baluchestan province.
Table 3 shows that the implementation of the Health Transformation Plan had a significant impact on public health coverage indicators, including increases in coverage of pneumonia measures, pregnancy care, vaccination, HIV treatment, and health (safe drinking water and sanitary toilet), hypertension and diabetes treatment, cervical cancer screening and active hospital beds.
Variable |
TIME |
Number |
Standard deviation ± mean |
Middle |
Lowest |
Highest |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
family planning coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
2.04±32.87 |
33.56 |
28.69 |
37.04 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
2.67±27.16 |
22.60 |
21.62 |
32.71 |
|
family planning coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
5.81±14.86 |
0.26 |
3.00 |
26.72 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
6.53±19.16 |
7.50 |
5.64 |
32.68 |
|
Vaccination coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
0.60±98.27 |
99.00 |
97.05 |
99.50 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
0.75±101.62 |
100.6 |
100.00 |
103.10 |
|
prenatal care coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
2.11±60.35 |
60.85 |
56.05 |
64.66 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
3.26±74.06 |
69.75 |
67.32 |
80.81 |
|
TB Treatment coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
1.16±89.15 |
89.87 |
86.78 |
91.53 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
2.08±87.08 |
88.00 |
82.76 |
91.39 |
|
HIV treatment coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
6.83±35.43 |
13.78 |
21.48 |
49.38 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
5.64±62.80 |
58.66 |
51.12 |
74.48 |
|
Coverage of malaria prevention measures |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
3.59±25.03 |
19.65 |
17.69 |
32.38 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
2.39±9.54 |
3.00 |
4.59 |
14.49 |
|
Proper health coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
2.22±78.96 |
81.75 |
74.42 |
83.50 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
2.77±81.68 |
84.08 |
75.93 |
87.43 |
|
Blood pressure treatment coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
13.94±4.19 |
4.13 |
5.40 |
22.49 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
5.20±19.81 |
8.05 |
9.04 |
30.58 |
|
Blood sugar treatment coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
2.29±9.23 |
1.81 |
4.54 |
13.92 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
3.84±16.57 |
4.48 |
8.58 |
24.47 |
|
Cervical cancer screening coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
0.88±3.37 |
1.10 |
1.56 |
5.17 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
1.58±11.64 |
12.35 |
8.36 |
14.91 |
|
No smoking |
Before the health system transformation plan |
4 |
0.26±96.20 |
96.30 |
95.35 |
97.04 |
after the health system transformation plan |
19 |
0.56±95.93 |
96.00 |
94.74 |
97.11 |
|
Active hospital bed coverage per thousand population |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
6.78±37.05 |
15.81 |
23.21 |
50.90 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
8.44±42.83 |
23.60 |
25.35 |
60.31 |
|
Coverage of essential medicines |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
0.006±0.005 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.007 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
0.001±0.006 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.008 |
|
Average staff coverage |
Before the health system transformation plan |
32 |
0.05±0.78 |
0.71 |
0.66 |
0.90 |
after the health system transformation plan |
24 |
0.12±1.10 |
1.00 |
0.85 |
1.36 |
Table 3. Calculation of the percentage of UHC indicators before and after the health system transformation plan in Sistan and Baluchestan province.
Table 4 shows a significant difference in the mean percentage of UHC in different cities of Sistan and Baluchestan province (P <0.05). The highest mean UHC pertained to Khash city with a mean of 17.10 ± 1.10%.
City |
Number |
Average |
P-VALUE |
---|---|---|---|
Zahedan |
7 |
7.30±0.67 |
<0.0001 |
Saravan |
7 |
9.30±0.55 |
|
Kasha |
7 |
17.10±1.10 |
|
Zabol |
7 |
8.33±0.72 |
|
Chabahar |
7 |
7.60±0.58 |
|
Iranshahr |
7 |
7.80±0.85 |
|
Sabras |
7 |
6.30±0.55 |
|
Nikshahr |
7 |
7.20±0.76 |
|
Sistan and Baluchestan |
56 |
13.00±1.01 |
Table 4. Comparison of the percentage of UHC in the studied cities in Sistan and Baluchestan province.
Table 5 shows a significant difference in the mean UHC from 2012 to 2018 (P <0.05). This difference increased from 13.86 ± 0.88% in 2012 to 20.57 ± 76 0.76% in 2018.
Year |
Number |
Average |
P-VALUE |
---|---|---|---|
1391 |
8 |
13.86±0.88 |
<0.0001 |
1392 |
8 |
10.67±0.89 |
|
1393 |
8 |
11.33±0.88 |
|
1394 |
8 |
12.24±0.98 |
|
1395 |
8 |
10.06±0.65 |
|
1396 |
8 |
13.52±0.65 |
|
1397 |
8 |
20.57±0.76 |
Table 5. Comparison of the mean UHC in Sistan and Baluchestan province from 2012 to 2018.
Table 6 shows a significant difference in the mean percentage of UHC before and after the implementation of the Health Transformation Plan. This difference is evident in all cities, such that after the implementation of the Health Transformation Plan, the mean percentage of UHC significantly increased (P <0.002).
City |
Before the health system transformation plan |
Number |
Standard deviation ± mean |
P-VALUE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zahedan |
Before the health system transformation plan |
4 |
4.74±0.20 |
0/002 |
after the health system transformation plan |
3 |
9.13±0.30 |
||
Zahedan |
Before the health system transformation plan |
4 |
9.09±0.40 |
0/002 |
after the health system transformation plan |
3 |
9.95±0.30 |
||
Sabras |
Before the health system transformation plan |
4 |
5.28±0.41 |
0/002 |
after the health system transformation plan |
3 |
0.00±0.00 |
||
Zabol |
Before the health system transformation plan |
4 |
4.47±0.20 |
0/002 |
after the health system transformation plan |
3 |
8.52±0.32 |
||
Kasha |
Before the health system transformation plan |
4 |
14.03±0.50 |
0/002 |
after the health system transformation plan |
3 |
18.74±0.21 |
||
Iranshahr |
--> |