Short Communication - Addiction & Criminology (2023) Volume 6, Issue 4
Understanding the role of genetics in criminality.Petra Padar*
Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Hungary
- *Corresponding Author:
- Petra Padar
Department of Forensic Medicine
Medical School, University of Pécs, Hungary
Received: 01-August-2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-108675; Editor assigned: 02-August-2023, PreQC No. AARA-23-108675(PQ); Reviewed: 16-August-2023, QC No. AARA-23- 108675; Revised: 21-August-2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-108675(R); Published: 28-August-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aara-6.4.165
Citation: Padar P. Understanding the role of genetics in criminality. Addict Criminol. 2023;6(4):165
The debate surrounding the role of genetics in criminality has long intrigued researchers and the public alike. This article delves into the complex relationship between genetics and criminal behavior, exploring the influence of genetic factors on propensity for criminality. It discusses the contributions of nature (genetics) and nurture (environment) to criminal behavior, highlighting the interaction between genetic predispositions and environmental influences. The article also examines the impact of specific genetic variations, such as MAOA and CDH13, on antisocial and criminal behavior. Understanding the role of genetics in criminality can contribute to more informed approaches to crime prevention, rehabilitation, and social policies .
The nature versus nurture debate seeks to unravel the relative contributions of genetics and environment in shaping human behavior, including criminality. It is widely accepted that both factors play significant roles, with genetic predispositions interacting with environmental influences to determine an individual's likelihood of engaging in criminal behavior. Genetic factors influence various traits associated with criminal behavior, including impulsivity, aggression, and sensation-seeking. Studies involving twins, adoptees, and family pedigrees suggest a hereditary component to criminality. Twin studies, in particular, have revealed higher concordance rates for criminal behavior among identical twins compared to fraternal twins, supporting the notion of genetic influence .
Environmental influences can either amplify or mitigate the expression of genetic predispositions for criminality. For example, individuals with a genetic predisposition for aggression may be more likely to engage in criminal behavior if exposed to a violent environment. While complex, multifactorial traits such as criminal behavior cannot be attributed to a single gene, certain genetic variations have been associated with an increased risk of antisocial and criminal behavior. One example is the MAOA gene, which encodes an enzyme involved in the metabolism of neurotransmitters. Variations in the MAOA gene, such as the "warrior gene" variant, have been linked to higher levels of aggression and antisocial behaviour .
Another gene of interest is CDH13, which is involved in neuronal development and synaptic connectivity. Variations in CDH13 have been associated with impulsivity and conduct disorder, both of which are linked to criminal behavior. However, like other genetic variations, the impact of CDH13 on criminality is influenced by environmental factors, such as childhood maltreatment or adverse experiences. It is important to note that these genetic variations only represent a small fraction of the complex genetic architecture underlying criminal behavior. Multiple genes, each with small effect sizes, interact with environmental factors to contribute to the development of criminal tendencies .
Understanding the role of genetics in criminality has implications for crime prevention and rehabilitation strategies. Recognizing that genetic predispositions interact with environmental influences can inform targeted interventions aimed at reducing the risk of criminal behavior. Early intervention programs that focus on improving parenting skills, providing educational support, and addressing socioeconomic disparities can help mitigate the environmental risk factors that exacerbate genetic predispositions for criminality. Such programs can promote positive development and resilience, reducing the likelihood of criminal involvement. For individuals already engaged in criminal behavior, acknowledging the role of genetics can inform rehabilitative efforts. Tailoring interventions to address specific genetic predispositions and addressing environmental triggers can enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs .
The role of genetics in criminality is complex, with genetic predispositions interacting with environmental influences to shape an individual's propensity for criminal behavior. While specific genetic variations have been associated with an increased risk of antisocial and criminal behavior, it is crucial to consider the interaction between genetics and environment. Understanding the genetic underpinnings of criminality can inform more nuanced approaches to crime prevention, rehabilitation, and social policies, promoting a better understanding of the complex factors contributing to criminal behavior and facilitating evidence-based strategies for intervention and support.
- Kendler KS, Lönn SL, Morris NA, et al. A Swedish national adoption study of criminality. Psychol Med. 2014;44(9):1913-25.
- Baschetti R. Genetic evidence that Darwin was right about criminality: Nature, not nurture. Med Hypotheses.2008;70(6):1092-102.
- Ferguson CJ, Ivory JD, Beaver KM. Genetic, maternal, school, intelligence, and media use predictors of adult criminality: A longitudinal test of the catalyst model in adolescence through early adulthood. J Aggression Maltreat Trauma. 2013;22(5):447-60.
- Cheung BY, Heine SJ. The double-edged sword of genetic accounts of criminality: Causal attributions from genetic ascriptions affect legal decision making. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;41(12):1723-38.
- Schilling CM, Walsh A, Yun I. ADHD and criminality: A primer on the genetic, neurobiological, evolutionary, and treatment literature for criminologists. J Crim Justice. 2011;39(1):3-11.