Addiction & Criminology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Opinion Article - Addiction & Criminology (2023) Volume 6, Issue 3

Understanding the causes of criminal behaviour.

Gilena Vata*

Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki, Finland

*Corresponding Author:
Gilena Vata
Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki, Finland

Received: 30-May -2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-104030; Editor assigned: 01-June-2023, PreQC No. AARA-23-104030 (PQ); Reviewed:15-June-2023, QC No. AARA-23-104030; Revised:20-June-2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-104030 (R); Published:27-June-2023, DOI:10.35841/aara-6.3.155

Citation: Vata G. Understanding the causes of criminal behaviour. Addict Criminol. 2023;6(3):155

Visit for more related articles at Addiction & Criminology


Criminal behavior is a complex issue that has long perplexed societies worldwide. To effectively address and prevent crime, it is crucial to understand the underlying root causes of criminal behavior. While various factors contribute to criminality, this article will focus on exploring the psychological perspective, shedding light on the fundamental triggers that drive individuals toward engaging in unlawful activities [1].

Psychologists widely acknowledge that early childhood experiences play a crucial role in shaping an individual's behavior and predisposition to criminality. Children who grow up in dysfunctional families characterized by abuse, neglect, or violence often face numerous psychological challenges. These adverse experiences can lead to the development of antisocial tendencies, aggressive behavior, and impaired emotional regulation, which may persist into adulthood. Consequently, such individuals are at a higher risk of engaging in criminal activities as a coping mechanism or as a result of learned behaviour.

Another significant factor contributing to criminal behavior is the presence of psychological disorders. Certain mental health conditions, such as antisocial personality disorder, conduct disorder, or substance abuse disorders, are frequently associated with criminal conduct. These disorders can impair an individual's ability to make sound judgments, control impulses, and empathize with others, increasing the likelihood of engaging in criminal acts. Addressing the underlying psychological disorders through therapy and appropriate interventions is vital in preventing the progression of criminal behavior [2].

Albert Bandura's social learning theory suggests that individuals learn through observation and imitation of others' behaviors. Applied to criminal behavior, this theory highlights the impact of role models, peers, and the environment on an individual's likelihood of engaging in illegal activities. Individuals who are surrounded by delinquent peers or exposed to deviant role models may adopt criminal behavior as a means of acceptance, fulfilling perceived needs, or seeking gratification. Breaking the cycle of criminal behavior requires intervention strategies that promote positive role models, discourage negative influences, and provide alternative pathways for personal growth and development [3].

Psychological factors also influence an individual's cognitive processes and decision-making abilities, which can contribute to criminal behavior. Some individuals exhibit cognitive distortions, such as rationalizing illegal actions, minimizing the potential consequences, or blaming others for their behavior. These distorted thought patterns can lead to a skewed perception of reality, making criminal acts appear justifiable or necessary. Cognitive-behavioral therapy techniques that challenge and correct these distorted thinking patterns can help individuals develop more constructive and law-abiding thought processes [4].

While psychological factors play a significant role in criminal behavior, it is essential to consider the influence of socioeconomic factors as well. Research consistently demonstrates a correlation between poverty, unemployment, and higher rates of criminal activity. Economic deprivation can create an environment where individuals are more likely to resort to criminal behavior as a means of survival, escape, or access to resources. Tackling poverty and promoting social equity through education, employment opportunities, and welfare programs can help reduce the socioeconomic pressures that contribute to criminality [5].


Understanding the root causes of criminal behavior from a psychological perspective is crucial for designing effective interventions and preventative measures. Early childhood experiences, psychological disorders, social learning, cognitive processes, and socioeconomic factors all play a role in shaping an individual's propensity toward criminal behavior. By addressing these factors through targeted therapies, educational programs, community support, and social reforms, it is possible to create an environment that fosters positive behavioral development and reduces the occurrence of criminal acts. Through a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, societies can work towards minimizing the prevalence of criminal behavior and creating safer communities for all.


  1. Larzelere RE, Patterson GR. Parental management: Mediator of the effect of socioeconomic status on early delinquency. Criminol. 1990;28(2):301-24.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref

  3. Ling S, Umbach R, Raine A. Biological explanations of criminal behavior. Psychol Crime Law. 2019;25(6):626-40.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Freudenburg WR, Jones RE. Criminal behavior and rapid community growth: Examining the evidence 1. Rural Sociol. 1991 56(4):619-45.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref

  7. Vila B. A general paradigm for understanding criminal behavior: Extending evolutionary ecological theory. Criminol. 1994;32(3):311-60.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Zhang J. The effect of welfare programs on criminal behavior: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Econ Inq. 1997;35(1):120-37.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App