Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Diagnosis and Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Perspective - Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Diagnosis and Therapy (2025) Volume 10, Issue 3

Title: Imaging in Parasitic Disease Detection: A Crucial Diagnostic Tool

Jean-Luc Dupont*

Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

Corresponding Author:
Jean-Luc Dupont
Institut Pasteur,
Institut Pasteur,
France
E-mail: jeanluc.dupont@pasteur.fr

Received: 02-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. AAPDDT-25-166530; Editor assigned: 03-Aug-2025, AAPDDT-25-166530 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Aug-2025, QC No. AAPDDT-25-166530; Revised: 22-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. AAPDDT-25-166530 (R); Published: 30-Aug-2025, DOI:10.35841/2591-7846.10.3.234

Citation: Dupont J L. Imaging in parasitic disease detection: a crucial diagnostic tool, J Parasit Dis Diagn Ther. 2025; 10(3):234

Introduction

Parasitic diseases continue to be a major public health concern, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. While traditional diagnostic methods such as microscopy and serological tests are widely used, imaging techniques have emerged as powerful tools in the detection and evaluation of parasitic infections. Imaging not only aids in early diagnosis but also provides critical insights into disease progression and treatment outcomes. Role of Imaging in Parasitology Imaging plays a pivotal role in identifying parasitic infections that affect internal organs where direct sampling is either risky or impractical. Techniques such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) [1, 2, 3, 4].

MRI is preferred for evaluating toxoplasmosis lesions in immunocompromised patients, particularly those with HIV/ AIDS. X-rays may help in identifying calcified cysts in tissues, often seen in chronic cases. Advantages of Imaging Imaging techniques offer several advantages: Non-invasive visualization of parasite-induced tissue changes. Precise localization of lesions for surgical planning. Real-time monitoring of therapeutic response. Ultrasound is highly effective in detecting hydatid cysts in the liver caused by Echinococcus granulosus. CT and MRI are commonly used for diagnosing neurocysticercosis, a brain infection caused by Taenia solium larvae. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) are used to detect organ-specific parasitic lesions, inflammation, cysts, or calcifications caused by parasites [5, 6].

Detection of complications such as abscesses, organ damage, or obstruction. Limitations and Future Directions While imaging is invaluable. It is often complementary rather than standalone. It cannot identify the exact parasitic species and must be used in conjunction with laboratory tests for confirmation. Accessibility and cost are also limiting factors, especially in resource-poor settings. The future lies in advanced imaging modalities and AI[1]assisted interpretation, which promise more accurate and automated diagnostics. Integration of imaging with molecular diagnostics could revolutionize parasitic disease detection and management [7, 8, 9, 10].

Conclusion

Imaging has become an essential component in the diagnosis and management of parasitic diseases. By offering detailed visualization of pathological changes, it enhances clinical Junision-making and improves patient outcomes. As technology advances, its role is expected to expand, particularly in endemic regions where precise and timely diagnosis is critical.

References

  1. García-Montero C, Fraile-Martínez O, Gómez-Lahoz AM, et al. Nutritional components in Western diet versus Mediterranean diet at the gut microbiota–immune system interplay. Implications for health and disease.Nutrients.2021;13(2):699.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Davis EC, Castagna VP, Sela DA, et al. Gut microbiome and breast-feeding: Implications for early immune development. J Allergy Clin Immuno2022;150(3):523-34.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Seymour CW, Kennedy JN, Wang S, et al. Derivation, validation, and potential treatment implications of novel clinical phenotypes for sepsis. JAMA. 2019;321(20):2003-17.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Federici S, Kviatcovsky D, Valdés-Mas R, et al. Microbiome-phage interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29(6):682-8.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref 

  5. Genco RJ, Sanz M. Clinical and public health implications of periodontal and systemic diseases: An overview. Periodontol 2000. 2020;83(1):7-13.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Hanson MA. When the microbiome shapes the host: immune evolution implications for infectious disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024;379(1901):20230061.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Martínez M, Postolache TT, García-Bueno B, et al. The role of the oral microbiota related to periodontal diseases in anxiety, mood and trauma-and stress-related disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2022;12:814177.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Schluter J, Peled JU, Taylor BP, et al. The gut microbiota is associated with immune cell dynamics in humans. Nature. 2020;588(7837):303-7.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Ladner JT, Grubaugh ND, Pybus OG, et al. Precision epidemiology for infectious disease control. Nat Med.2019;25(2):206-11.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Thompson KN, Bonham KS, Ilott NE, et al. Alterations in the gut microbiome implicate key taxa and metabolic pathways across inflammatory arthritis phenotypes. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(706):eabn4722.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App