Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Commentary - Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

The Science Behind Fractional Laser Resurfacing: How It Works and Its Benefits

Richard Hamilton *

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Richard Hamilton
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA
E-mail: richamilton@gmail.com

Received: 03-Apr -2025, Manuscript No. AADRSC-25-163879; Editor assigned: 04-Apr-2025, PreQC No. AADRSC-25-163879 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Apr-2025, QC No. AADRSC-25-163879; Revised:23-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AADRSC-25-163879 (R); Published:28-Apr-2025, DOI:10.35841/aara-9.2.264

Citation: Hamilton R. The science behind fractional laser resurfacing: How it works and its benefits. Dermatol Res Skin Care. 2025; 9(2):264

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care

Introduction

Fractional laser resurfacing has emerged as one of the most transformative technologies in dermatology, offering a balance between efficacy and minimal downtime. Designed to improve skin texture, tone, and overall appearance, it treats conditions such as acne scars, fine lines, pigmentation, and sun damage [1].

Unlike traditional ablative lasers that remove entire layers of skin, fractional lasers treat microscopic fractions of the skin, triggering natural healing and collagen production. This article delves into the science of how fractional laser resurfacing works and explores its wide range of benefits [2].

Fractional laser resurfacing involves the delivery of laser energy in a grid-like pattern, creating thousands of tiny thermal micro-injuries called microscopic treatment zones (MTZs). These MTZs are surrounded by untreated skin, which accelerates the healing process and stimulates collagen remodelling [3].

Both approaches aim to rejuvenate the skin, but ablative lasers typically offer more dramatic results at the cost of slightly longer recovery time. Fractional lasers operate on the principle of fractional photothermolysis the strategic targeting of water-rich tissue to create thermal damage that prompts the body’s natural wound-healing response [4].

Because fractional lasers leave surrounding tissue intact, healing is significantly faster than with traditional full-field lasers. Most patients experience 3–7 days of mild redness and peeling. Fractional lasers are highly effective in refining rough skin, minimizing pores, and evening out pigmentation. Studies show significant improvements in skin smoothness and luminosity after a series of treatments [5].

Fractional lasers are particularly beneficial for atrophic acne scars. By promoting collagen remodeling beneath the scarred surface, the skin becomes smoother over time. Collagen stimulation tightens skin and reduces the appearance of fine lines, especially around the eyes and mouth. A clinical trial demonstrated significant wrinkle reduction after multiple fractional CO? sessions [6].

Fractional lasers have also been shown to improve stretch marks by targeting dermal remodeling. Results vary, but multiple sessions can yield visible improvements. Fractional systems allow customization of treatment depth, density, and energy level. This flexibility makes it suitable for various skin types and concerns, from superficial rejuvenation to deep scar correction [7].

Traditional ablative lasers pose risks of hyperpigmentation in darker skin. Fractional non-ablative lasers, when used correctly, reduce these risks and can be used safely on Fitzpatrick skin types IV–VI. Collagen regeneration continues for months after treatment. With proper skincare and sun protection, results can last over a year or longer [8].

Following fractional resurfacing, patients should follow a dedicated post-procedure regimen, including: Broad-spectrum sunscreen, Gentle cleansers and moisturizers, Avoiding direct sun exposure [9].

Redness, mild swelling, and flaking are common for a few days. Most individuals can resume normal activities within a week. Despite its advantages, fractional resurfacing may not be suitable for everyone. Potential risks include: Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), Mild discomfort during treatment, Temporary redness and swelling [10].

Conclusion

Fractional laser resurfacing represents a scientific leap forward in aesthetic dermatology. By harnessing controlled thermal injury and leveraging the skin's natural healing mechanisms, it offers a safe, effective, and customizable solution for various skin concerns. Whether used to reduce scars, rejuvenate aging skin, or enhance overall complexion, fractional lasers continue to set the standard for non-surgical skin renewal.

References

  1. Karimipour DJ, Karimipour G, Orringer JS. Microdermabrasion: an evidence-based review. Plast Reconst Surg. 2010;125(1):372-7.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

  3. Andre P. Evaluation of the safety of a non?animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA–Q?Medical, Sweden) in European countries: a retrospective study from 1997 to 2001. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18(4):422-5.
  4. Google Scholar

  5. Berson DS, Cohen JL, Rendon MI, et al. Clinical role and application of superficial chemical peels in today's practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8(9):803-11.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Kessler E, Flanagan K, Chia C, et al. Comparison of α?and β?Hydroxy Acid Chemical Peels in the Treatment of Mild to Moderately Severe Facial Acne Vulgaris. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(1):45-51.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Monheit GD. The Jessner's-trichloroacetic acid peel. An enhanced medium-depth chemical peel. Dermatol Clin. 1995;13:277-83.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  13. Cherin P, Pelletier S, Teixeira A, et al. Results and long?term followup of intravenous immunoglobulin infusions in chronic, refractory polymyositis: an open study with thirty?five adult patients. Arthritis Rheumat. 2002;46(2):467-74.
  14. Google Scholar

  15. Boericke W. New manual of homoeopathic materia medica and repertory. B Jain Publ. 2001.
  16. Google Scholar

  17. Kanwar AJ, De D. Epidemiology and clinical features of atopic dermatitis in India. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56(5):471.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  19. Eizayaga JE, Eizayaga JI. Prospective observational study of 42 patients with atopic dermatitis treated with homeopathic medicines. Homeopathy. 2012;101(01):21-7.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

Get the App