Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Case Report - Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures (2022) Volume 6, Issue 4

The effect of family member's presence during treatment and invasive procedures on victim and families.

Thomas Yu Yau*

Department of Critical Care and Management Nursing, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

*Corresponding Author:
Thomas Yu Yau
Department of Critical Care and Management Nursing
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Received: 05-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. AARRGO-22-54355; Editor assigned: 07-Jul-2022, PreQC No. AARRGO-22-54355(PQ); Reviewed: 21-Jul-2022, QC No. AARRGO-22-54355; Revised: 23-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. AARRGO-22-54355(R); Published: 30-Jul-2022, DOI:10.35841/2591-7366-6.4.120

Citation: Yu Yau T. The effect of family member’s presence during treatment and invasive procedures on victim and families. Case Rep Surg Invasive Proced. 2022;6(4):120

Visit for more related articles at Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures


The idea of family presence during revival and obtrusive techniques is a disputable issue and has not been generally embraced by medical care suppliers. Attributable to the sheer number of concentrates in this field, we led this umbrella review to furnish an outline of this idea fully intent on researching the effect of family presence on patients, families, and revival and obtrusive techniques. In this survey, utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute levels of proof umbrella approach rules, the creators looked through PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane data set for precise audit and meta-examination concentrates on that assessed the presence of family during revival and obtrusive strategies without time limit until July 2020. The accompanying catchphrases were utilized for the hunt: family presence; family witness; parent presence; parent observer; and revival. A sum of 254 articles distributed between January 1967 and July 2020 were screened. Five articles (meta-examination and 4 efficient audits) met the incorporation rules.


Strategies, Procedures, Techniques.


The survey showed that family presence during revival or obtrusive methodology doesn't adversely affect relatives, patients, or the revival or intrusive intercession process. Relatives centre around the patients, not the continuous treatment. The presence of relatives is gainful for both relatives and medical care staff. None of the inspected examinations detailed an adverse consequence on relatives [1].

The presence of guardians and other close relatives during revival and intrusive methodology decidedly affects patients, families, and medical care staff. By and large, there has been a hesitance to permit Family Presence during Resuscitation (FPDR) or intrusive systems [2]. Presented the idea of FPDR in 1987. Over 10 years after the fact, Hanson and Strawser 3 presented this idea in nursing reading material. They showed that 94% of the families who had encountered this presence expressed that, in comparative conditions, they would need to be available again during revival and proposed that this be proposed to different families also. The American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council suggest giving the essential offices and backing for relatives to be available during revival, expressing those social and social elements ought to likewise be considered. The European Rehabilitation Council believes FPDR to be an idea that puts high worth on the freedom of patients and their families. This gathering has not illustrated any worries concerning close to home damage to relatives or impedance during revival. Notwithstanding these clinical rules on the significance of family presence, it stays a disputable issue. Many nursing pioneers are hesitant to carry out FPDR.

This is a consequence of negative impression of medical caretaker supervisors about the expected risks of FPDR, restricted insight of carrying out this program in the clinical setting, and absence of clinical strategy rules. In such manner, the worries included absence of staff bringing about the failure to give assigned family support faculty at the bedside, absence of room in the revival space to oblige the family, and view of an adverse consequence on the preparation of students. Dissimilar to attendants and suppliers, patients and their families support FPDR [3]. Noticing the revival technique decreases relatives' sensations of vulnerability and helps them through the lamenting system by giving them the chance to observe the revival endeavours. Since the distribution by Hanson and Strawser 3 of their nursing course reading, numerous scientists in various areas of the planet have concentrated on FPDR.

The quantity of methodical audits, coordinated surveys, and meta-examinations is various and in this way required an umbrella review. An umbrella survey, likewise called survey of audits, is a precise survey of other deliberate audits that features their outcomes and techniques, gives an outline of existing information, gives speedy admittance to a bunch of data, and gives a premise to contrasting examinations led on a specific theme. We planned and led an umbrella survey to decide, assess, and audit the accessible proof on the presence of relatives during cardiopulmonary revival and obtrusive strategies [4]. Keywords: Strategies, Procedures, Techniques.

To lead this survey study, the umbrella philosophy convention of the Joanna Briggs Institute levels of proof was utilized to recognize search methodologies and consideration/rejection standards and afterward decide the examination question, populace, mediation, correlation bunch, and results. In situations where a few deliberate surveys have resolved a similar inquiry, the umbrella survey can give a more extensive view by collecting the consequences of these investigations. Generally, 713 articles were found in the underlying data set search. In the wake of eliminating copy articles utilizing EndNote programming (Clarivate), 254 articles remained. Consequently, 212 articles were barred on the grounds that they were not survey studies. Of the 42 excess survey articles, 12 were precise audits or meta-investigations. Seven of these 12 articles were barred in light of the fact that they analysed albeit the ideas of family-and patient-focused care and existing rules suggest the presence of relatives during revival and intrusive techniques, it isn't generally adopted 1,30,31. This might be because of an absence of help, solace, and participation among clinical staff. Contentions against family presence have zeroed in on worries with impedance to patient consideration, postponed commencement of revival, interruption of revival colleagues, and expanded weight on clinical [5].


The presence of guardians and families during cardiopulmonary revival and intrusive methodology is protected and helps patients, families, and clinical experts. Family presence gives the chance to observe the actions taken during the revival, helps meet profound and otherworldly necessities, and works with the lamenting system. Clinical focuses ought to give the fundamental preparation and backing to carry out this training.


  1. Pellegrini CA, de Santibanes E. Achieving mastery in the practice of surgery. Annals Surg. 2019;270(5):735-7.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Elsey EJ, Griffiths G, Humes DJ, et al. Meta-analysis of operative experiences of general surgery trainees during training. Br J Surg. 2017;104(1):22-33.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Shuhaiber JH. Augmented reality in surgery. Archiv Surg. 2004;139(2):170-4.
  6. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Onetti A. Applying a managerial approach to day surgery. Int J Surg. 2008;6:S41-3.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Lavy C, Sauven K, Mkandawire N, et al. State of surgery in tropical Africa: A review. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):262-71.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App