+44-1518-081136Perspective - Journal of Primary Care and General Practice (2025) Volume 8, Issue 4
Telemedicine in primary care: Promise and pitfalls
Ethan Collins*
Department of Digital Health, Stanford University, California, USA
- *Corresponding Author:
- Ethan Collins
Department of Digital Health
Stanford University, California, USA.
E-mail: ethan.collins@stanfordmed.edu
Received : 07-Nov-2025, Manuscript No. aapcgp-213; Editor assigned : 11-Nov-2025, PreQC No. aapcgp-213(PQ); Reviewed : 01-Dec-2025, QC No aapcgp-213; Revised : 10-Dec-2025, Manuscript No. aapcgp-213(R); Published : 19-Dec-2025 , DOI : 10.35841/aapcgp-8.4.213
Citation: Collins E. Telemedicine in primary care: Promise and pitfalls. aapcgp. 2025;08(04):213.
Introduction
Telemedicine has rapidly transformed primary care, accelerated by global health crises. It's reshaping service delivery, access, and patient-provider interactions, prompting a reevaluation of traditional healthcare models. This shift, while promising enhanced access and efficiency, also introduces complex considerations across technological readiness, provider and patient experiences, policy, and health equity. Understanding these multifaceted dynamics is crucial for shaping primary care’s future. Successful telemedicine implementation in primary care hinges on robust infrastructure, adequate provider training, and clear policy frameworks [1].
Without these, the transition to virtual care can lead to inequities and inefficiencies. Conversely, well-planned implementation significantly improves patient access and outcomes, making a strategic approach paramount [1].
The experiences of patients and physicians with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted its convenience and improved access for many [2].
Yet, it also revealed significant concerns regarding communication quality, the limitations of physical examinations, and an exacerbated digital divide affecting vulnerable populations [2].
Physicians faced increased workloads and technical challenges, suggesting hybrid care models and targeted training are needed to optimize telehealth’s role [2].
Primary care physicians' adoption of telemedicine is influenced by technological proficiency, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and strong organizational support [3].
Broader systemic elements like patient demand, reimbursement policies, and clinical guidelines also significantly shape integration [3].
Addressing these influences is essential for designing effective interventions and policies that foster sustainable and widespread adoption [3].
Telehealth’s impact on the quality of care, especially for patients with chronic conditions, shows promise. It can maintain or improve aspects like medication adherence, disease management, and patient satisfaction, particularly for chronic disease monitoring [4].
However, effectiveness varies across conditions and populations, underscoring the need for tailored interventions and rigorous evaluation to ensure equitable, high-quality care [4].
The intersection of telehealth and health equity is critical. Virtual care can both bridge and widen existing disparities [5].
Barriers like limited digital literacy, unreliable broadband access, and socioeconomic factors disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, creating hurdles to access [5].
Equitable telehealth program design must consider diverse patient needs and incorporate policies to mitigate the digital divide, ensuring virtual care benefits all segments [5].
A diverse range of telehealth models exist in primary care, categorized by service type, technology, and integration level [6].
These range from real-time video consultations and remote monitoring to asynchronous messaging [6].
Recognizing that different models suit specific clinical needs and patient populations highlights the importance of a flexible, patient-centered approach for optimal implementation [6].
Economically, while initial setup costs can be substantial, many interventions demonstrate long-term benefits from reduced travel, fewer hospitalizations, and improved chronic disease management [7].
Robust economic modeling and context-specific evaluations are vital to accurately assess telemedicine's value, confirming that judicious implementation offers both clinical improvements and cost savings [7].
Physicians' perspectives are invaluable. While they appreciate telehealth’s flexibility and efficiency for certain consultations, concerns persist regarding continuity of care, diagnostic limitations, and the loss of personal connection [8].
The consensus suggests telemedicine should complement, not replace, in-person care, with careful consideration for patient suitability and clinical context [8].
This necessitates addressing existing training and educational gaps among providers, particularly in best practices for virtual consultations, technology troubleshooting, and effective communication [9].
Providers desire structured education, practical guides, and peer support to build confidence and competence, pointing to a clear need for integrated telemedicine curricula in medical education and continuous professional development [9].
Looking ahead, telemedicine is projected to be a permanent fixture, demanding thoughtful policy, continuous innovation, and careful integration to leverage its potential while mitigating risks like exacerbating health inequalities [10].
This calls for a balanced and adaptable approach to evolve primary care models effectively.
Conclusion
Telemedicine is transforming primary care, bringing both significant opportunities and complex challenges. Evidence shows that successful implementation hinges on robust infrastructure, adequate training for providers, and clear policy frameworks [C001]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth offered convenience and improved access, but also highlighted concerns about communication quality, the absence of physical exams, and the digital divide affecting vulnerable populations [C002]. Physicians, in particular, faced increased workloads and technical hurdles, suggesting that hybrid care models and targeted training could optimize virtual care services [C002]. A key aspect of telemedicine adoption by primary care physicians involves technological proficiency, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and strong organizational backing [C003]. Patient demand, reimbursement policies, and established clinical guidelines also play a vital role in shaping its integration into routine practice [C003]. For patients with chronic conditions, telehealth has shown promise in maintaining or even improving care quality, particularly in areas like medication adherence and disease management [C004]. However, effectiveness varies, indicating a need for tailored interventions to ensure equitable and high-quality outcomes [C004]. The intersection of telehealth and health equity is critical, as virtual care can both bridge and widen existing disparities [C005]. Factors such as digital literacy, reliable broadband access, and socioeconomic status can create barriers for those already vulnerable, making equitable program design and policies to address the digital divide essential [C005]. Furthermore, various models of telehealth exist, from video consultations to remote monitoring, emphasizing the need for flexible, patient-centered approaches to optimize benefits [C006]. While initial setup costs can be high, telemedicine often yields long-term economic benefits through reduced travel and hospitalizations [C007]. Physicians generally value telehealth's flexibility but worry about continuity of care and diagnostic limitations, suggesting it should complement, not replace, in-person visits [C008]. Addressing training gaps for providers in virtual consultation best practices and communication is also paramount for delivering high-quality virtual care [C009]. Ultimately, telemedicine is poised to be a permanent fixture in primary care, necessitating thoughtful policy and innovation for a balanced and adaptable future [C010].
References
- Kholoud A, Sarah A, Mishaal A. Telemedicine Implementation in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16(N/A):345-359.
- Marina S, Cary S, Sheila O. Patient and physician experiences with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(5):331-352.
- Yi M, Leesa J, Jiali J. Factors influencing primary care physicians' adoption of telemedicine: A scoping review. Front Public Health. 2023;11(N/A):1095596.
- V RA, Bharathi A, Arka A. Telehealth and Quality of Care for Patients with Chronic Conditions in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. J Med Syst. 2022;46(11):73.
- Michelle G, Ibtisam A, Hiren V. Telehealth and Health Equity in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. J Prim Care Community Health. 2023;14(N/A):21501327231175620.
- Olivia D, Rayan G, Jean-Philippe F. Models of Telehealth in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(12):e40884.
- Reema A, Khalid A, Diana A. Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine interventions in primary care: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2024;30(1):1357633X231189397.
- Purvi M, Rebecca B, Rebecca G. Primary care physicians' perspectives on the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2022;6(3):BJGPO.2022.0071.
- Christine TL, Brenda P, Elizabeth L. Training and Educational Needs for Telehealth in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Providers' Experiences. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(1):110-116.
- Trisha G, Harbinder D, Sara S. The future of primary care and the role of telemedicine: An international perspective. J R Soc Med. 2020;113(2):50-56.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref