Keywords
             | 
        
        
            | Carbonic anhydrase, Ag55, larval cell, Anopheles gambiae, RNAi, gene silencing | 
        
        
            
            Introduction
             | 
        
        
            | RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful tool for           manipulating mRNA levels and has been used in a variety           of systems (for example, Elbashir et al, 2001; Zhao et al,           2007). One particular group of organisms in which RNAi           is used extensively is arthropods, and the technique has           been demonstrated in many arthropod species including           mosquitoes (Lu et al, 2004). However, although RNAi has           been adapted for use in adult mosquitoes (Blandin et al,           2002) it is not well established for mosquito larvae.           Therefore, the demonstration of successful RNAi in a           larval mosquito cell line will be an important step towards           manipulating mRNA levels in vivo. The manipulation of           larval gene expression is a crucial step in understanding           the mechanisms responsible for their survival. Of           particular interest to our laboratory is the regulation of           genes involved in larval pH regulation. | 
        
        
            | Mosquito larvae generate a highly alkaline pH (~10.5) in a           restricted area of their alimentary canal (AC), the anterior midgut (AMG) (Dadd, 1975), despite the absence of           morphological barriers between the AMG and adjacent,           more neutral regions of the AC. The alkaline environment           is thought to aid in digestion and is crucial for larval           survival (Corena et al, 2004). However, the molecular           mechanisms responsible for the generation and           maintenance of the pH gradient are not fully understood. A           better understanding of these mechanisms could pave way           for the discovery of novel targets for new and improved           larvacides. | 
        
        
            | One group of proteins with a known role in AMG           alkalization is the carbonic anhydrase (CA) family (del           Pilar Corena et al, 2002). There are a predicted twelve           genes belonging to the Anopheles gambiae CA family           (www.ensembl.org), six of which have been cloned by           members of our laboratory (Smith et al, 2007). Our           laboratory has detected CA within the epithelial cells of           the mosquito larval AC in both An. gambiae and Aedes           aegypti using various methods (del Pilar Corena et al,           2002; Corena et al, 2004; Seron et al, 2004; Smith et al, 2007; Neira Oviedo et al, 2008). Additionally, we           established that CA is necessary for mosquito larval           alkalization and survival (Corena et al, 2004). | 
        
        
            | Currently, the specific roles of each CA member are           unknown. A first step in determining if any one CA or           combination of CAs is responsible for pH regulation is to           silence them either individually or in concert. In order to           determine whether CAs can be manipulated by RNAi, we           used an An. gambiae larval cell line, Ag55, to demonstrate           CA silencing. Here, we report the mRNA down-regulation           of an abundant AC CA, AgCA9 (GenBank accession           number DQ518576) in Ag55 cells and the downstream           knockdown of the protein product. | 
        
        
            
            Material And Methods
             | 
        
        
            
            Polymerase chain reactions
             | 
        
        
            | Nucleotide sequence for primers and thermal cycling           parameters used in the various polymerase chain reactions           are given in Table 1. | 
        
        
            | Ag55 cells | 
        
        
            | Ag55 cell line (Pudney et al, 1979) was a gift from           Kimberly Keene (Colorado State University). The cells           were grown in 75 cm2 flasks (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh,           PA) at 28°C in Leibovitz's L-15 media (Sigma-Aldrich, St           Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine           serum (FBS, Atlantic Biologicals, Norcross, GA), 1%           (v/v) Penicillin-Streptomycin solution (10,000U/ml and           10mg/ml, respectively) (Sigma-Aldrich). The cell culture           medium was changed every other day. | 
        
        
            | Detection of AgCAs | 
        
        
            | RNA was extracted from 10 x 106 Ag55 cells or 20-30           whole An. gambiae fourth-instar larvae using TriZol           Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc, Cincinnati,           OH). Genomic contamination was removed using the           TURBO DNA-free™ kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). RNA was           reverse transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript® III           Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). All           procedures were conducted according to manufacturer’s           instructions. | 
        
        
            | cDNA from Ag55 cells or whole larvae was used as a           template for PCR reactions with primers specific to one of           the twelve predicted An. gambiae CA genes. Primers were           designed to amplify whole mRNA, in the case of those           fully cloned and sequenced genes, or a portion of the           mRNA predicted by the An. gambiae genome           (www.ensembl.org; February 2006 update). The PCR           product was gel extracted (Qiagen Gel-extraction kit,           Valencia, CA), ligated into the pCR4-TOPO vector           (Invitrogen), and sequenced using the ABI Prism Big Dye           Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (PE Biosystems, Foster           City, CA). The reaction products were analyzed in an ABI           Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer. | 
        
        
            | RNA production | 
        
        
            | RNA was produced by in vitro transcription in three steps:           creation of double-stranded (ds)DNA flanked by the T7           promoter sequence on either the 5’ or 3’ end, transcription           of sense and antisense strands into single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), and finally, annealing of the two single strands           into dsRNA. Primers were designed to amplify either           AgCA9 or eGFP DNA and to add a T7 promoter sequence           at either the 5’ or 3’ end. eGFP cDNA was a gift from           Lyric Bartholomay (University of Wisconsin). The PCR           products were purified using the Qiagen PCR purification           kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. | 
        
        
            | Sense (from dsDNA with 5’ T7) and antisense (from           dsDNA with 3’ T7) RNA were transcribed from the above           dsDNA using the MEGAscript T7 transcription kit           (Ambion) and treated with TURBO DNase (Ambion)           according to manufacturer’s instructions. Each ssRNA           strand was then adjusted to equal concentrations for           annealing. Equal volumes of each strand were combined           and incubated in a 95°C water bath for five minutes; the           heat was removed and the water bath (with tubes in it) was           allowed to cool to room temperature overnight. | 
        
        
            | RNAi experiments | 
        
        
            | Ag55 cells were grown to 70% confluency in six well           plates for experimental (AgCA9 dsRNA treated) and two           control groups (eGFP dsRNA treated and untreated). The           untreated group did not receive dsRNA, but was subjected           to the same conditions as the other two groups. To treat the           cells, media was replaced with 800μl serum-free medium           plus 36.0μg dsRNA. The plate was rocked at room           temperature for 30min and then 800μl medium plus 20%           FBS was added. Cells were incubated at 28ºC and           harvested at 24, 48, 72 or 96 hr post-treatment; after 96hr,           the cells began to overgrow and die. To harvest, the cells           were washed twice with 2.0 ml serum-free medium and           resuspended in 0.4 ml Trizol Reagent to extract RNA and           protein according to manufacturer’s instructions. | 
        
        
            | Quantitative PCR (q-PCR) | 
        
        
            | RNA from each set of cells was treated with DNase and           reverse transcribed as described previously. In order to           detect AgCAs, Q-PCR primers were designed to amplify           ~50 bp fragments of both AgCA9 3’ UTR or an 18s           ribosomal RNA control using ABI primer express           software. The reactions were prepared and run using           SYBR Green Master Mix (ABI) with 300UM of each           AgCA9 primer or 100UM of each 18s primer in a 96 well           plate; each reaction was run in triplicate. Q-PCR was           performed using Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7000           Sequence Detection system and data were analyzed using           the relative expression method described in Pfaffl (2001). | 
        
        
            | Northern blotting | 
        
        
            | To generate a radioactive northern probe, a pCR4-TOPO           vector containing full-length AgCA9 was linearized by           restriction enzyme digest with either PstI or NotI. This           template was then reverse transcribed and radiolabeled           with 32P-labeled dUTP (800Ci/mmol, 20mCi/ml; GE           Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp, Piscataway, NJ) using the           Maxiscript kit (Ambion). The NorthernMax Kit protocol           (Ambion) was used to run and analyze the northern blot.           All procedures were conducted according to           manufacturer’s instructions. The following amounts of           RNA were loaded for each time point: 48hr - 10μg, 72hr -           6.3μg, and 96hr - 8.0μg. Less than 1.0μg RNA was           extracted from 24hr time point cells, and could not be           visualized on the northern blot. | 
        
        
              | 
        
        
            | Western blotting | 
        
        
            | Chicken antibodies were generated by Aves Labs, Inc           (Tigard, OR) against the BSA-conjugated peptide:           CZELGNRQLREVDSY and were used as purified IgY           (Smith et al, 2007). To detect AgCA9 from each set of           Ag55 cells (those treated with AgCA9 dsRNA or eGFP           dsRNA, or those left untreated for 24, 48, 72 and 96 hr),           western blotting was performed as described in Smith et al           (2007). In addition to the total protein stain a second           protein, which cross-reacted with the antibody,           distinguishable by its slightly higher molecular weight,           was used to support equal loading of each sample. | 
        
        
            
            Results And Discussion
             | 
        
        
            | Expression of AgCAs | 
        
        
            | The Ag55 cell line is an An. gambiae neonatal first-instar           larval cell line which has been used by others for           successful RNAi silencing (Konet et al, 2007). PCR was           used to determine which CA genes were expressed in           Ag55 cells, using whole larvae as a control template           (Figure 1). All but AgCA1 and AgCA7 were detectable in           the whole larvae controls using the indicated primers. It is           possible that these CAs were expressed at a level too low           to be detected using our methods. However, the expression of many CA genes is known to be highly-variable between           larval and adult specimens (Dissanayake et al, 2006).           Thus, it is also possible that these CAs might not be           expressed at this particular developmental stage. Ag55           cells expressed AgCA3, AgCA9 and AgCAb. AgCA9 is a           good candidate for a role in larval pH regulation due to the           high-level mRNA expression in the gastric caeca and           ectoperitrophic space (Smith et al, 2007). Therefore we           chose to test whether this CA could be silenced in Ag55           cells using RNAi. | 
        
        
              | 
        
        
            | Reduction of AgCA9 mRNA and protein levels by           using dsRNA | 
        
        
            | Ag55 cells were treated with full length AgCA9 dsRNA,           eGFP dsRNA or were left untreated for 24, 48, 72 or 96           hr. Treatment with AgCA9 dsRNA resulted in a           statistically significant (P-value <0.05) knock-down of           AgCA9 mRNA compared to the eGFP dsRNA or           untreated cells as determined by q-PCR analyses (Figure           2A). This knock-down became evident after 24hr and           persisted for at least 96hr, exhibiting 88% reduction in           AgCA9 mRNA level at 96hr time-point. These time-point           data are consistent with previous reports, which suggested           RNAi silencing to occur in as little as 24hr (Blitzer et al,           2005) and to last for at least ten days (Keene et al, 2004). | 
        
        
            | Northern blot analysis performed in parallel with q-PCR           supported a considerable knock-down of AgCA9 mRNA           in cells treated with AgCA9 dsRNA (Figure 2B). A           distinct AgCA9 mRNA band was detected at the expected           size (~1.5 kb), including un-translated regions, in the           control lanes, which was absent from the cells treated with           AgCA9 dsRNA. These data, in conjunction with q-PCR           results, demonstrate that introduction of dsRNA is           sufficient to silence AgCA9 mRNA in Ag55 cells. | 
        
        
            | When using RNAi to investigate protein function, the           protein half-life must be considered. If the protein is           stable, for example, with a half-life that exceeds the length           of the experiment, protein levels may remain unchanged even if mRNA expression is decreased. However, there are           no clear data to indicate the half-life of AgCA9 protein.           We therefore, tested by western blotting whether we could           reduce the AgCA9 levels parallel with the mRNA levels.           Western blot analysis demonstrated that AgCA9 protein           was indeed considerably down-regulated in cells treated           with AgCA9 dsRNA compared with the controls (Figure           3). These results indicate that AgCA9 protein is capable of           being manipulated by RNAi and suggests that this           technique has the potential for in vivo silencing of CAs.           By down-regulating CA protein in mosquito larvae, pH           changes can be assessed and relative contributions of each           CA to AMG pH regulation can be determined. | 
        
        
            | Several RNAi-based methods have been applied to silence           genes in adult mosquitoes: These include direct injection of           dsRNA (Boisson et al, 2006; Roy et al, 2007; Hansen et al,           2007), introduction of a transgene to deliver hairpin RNA           (Franz et al, 2006), and infection with a virus that produces           the dsRNA of interest (Adelman et al, 2001). The most           straightforward approach to RNAi in mosquitoes appears to           be direct injection of dsRNA into the hemocoel. Because           the AC is only one cell thick, and mosquitoes have an open           circulatory system, therefore, in principle, injected dsRNA           has access to virtually every AC cell. Down-regulation of           AgCA9 has proved difficult in our hands: We have           attempted this by injecting full-length dsRNA, 300 bp           dsRNA, or siRNAs into the hemolymph of An. gambiae for           various time-points and at various concentrations with little           success. Despite much work dedicated to larval RNAi on           the part of these authors and others, to date there is only           one report of successful RNAi in mosquito larvae via           injection of dsRNA (Blitzer et al, 2005), and one report           using transgenic larvae (Brown et al, 2003). | 
        
        
            | The apparent difference in RNAi susceptibility between           mosquito adults and larvae may be due to the inability of           larval cells to uptake dsRNA in a systemic manner, as           suggested for Drosophila melanogaster (Miller et al,           2008). Our work indicates that, as in D. melanogaster, larval mosquito cells possess the RNAi machinery.           However, for in vivo success delivery of intracellular           dsRNA may be the critical step. We have demonstrated           that the half-life of AgCA9 protein is likely to be short           enough to facilitate RNAi-mediated down-regulation in           An. gambie larvae. Further work in An. gambiae larvae,           and possible generation of a transgenic line, will yield a           greater understanding of this important family of genes in           the crucial process of pH regulation. | 
        
        
              | 
        
        
            | Figure 2. Analyses of AgCA9 mRNA expression. Quantitative PCR (A) and northern analysis (B) were used to determine      endogenous AgCA9 mRNA levels in Ag55 cells which had been treated with either AgCA9 dsRNA, eGFP dsRNA, or left untreated      for 24, 48, 72, or 96 hours. For northern analysis- lanes 1: AgCA9 dsRNA-treated cells; lanes 2: eGFP dsRNA-treated cells; lanes 3:     untreated cells. *: P-Value < 0.05, **: P-Value < 0.005. | 
        
        
              | 
        
        
            
            Conclusions
             | 
        
        
            | In conclusion we demonstrate that AgCA9 dsRNA can           down-regulate mRNA and protein levels in cultured larval           cells. Furthermore, protein down-regulation occurs within           24 hours and lasts for at least 96 hours. | 
        
        
            
            Acknowledgements
             | 
        
        
            | This research was supported by NIH grant: NIAID AI-           45098-10 (P. J. Linser). We thank Dr Bartholomay for           providing eGFP DNA and Dr Keene for providing the           Ag55 cell line. | 
        
        
            
            Competig Interests
             | 
        
        
            | None declared. | 
        
        
            
            List Of Abbreviations
             | 
        
        
            | AC; Alimentary canal | 
        
        
            | AMG; Anterior midgut | 
        
        
            | CA; Carbonic anhydrase | 
        
        
            | FBS ; Fetal bovine serum | 
        
        
            | q-PCR ; Quantitative PCR | 
        
        
            
        
        
            
 References
            
                - Adelman  ZN, Blair CD, Carlson JO, Beaty BJ, and Olson KE. 2001. Sindbis virus-induced  silencing of dengue viruses in mosquitoes. Insect Mol Biol, 10, 265-273.
 
                
                - Blandin  S, Moita LF, Köcher T, Wilm M, Kafatos FC and Levashina EA. 2002. Reverse genetics  in the mosquito
 
                
                - Anopheles  gambiae: targeted disruption of the Defensin gene. EMBO Reports, 3, 852-856.
 
                
                - Blitzer  EJ, Vyazunova I and Lan Q. 2005. Functional analysis of AeSCP-2 using gene  expression knockdown in the yellow fever   mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect Molec Biol, 14, 301-307.
 
                
                - Boisson  B, Jacques JC, Choumet V et al. 2006. Gene silencing in mosquito salivary  glands by RNAi. FEBS Lett, 580, 1988-1992.
 
                
                - Brown  AE, Crisanti A and Catteruccia F. 2003. Comparative analysis of DNA vectors at  mediating RNAi in Anopheles mosquito cells and larvae. J Exp Biol, 206(Pt 11),  1817-1823.
 
                
                - Corena  M, Fiedler MM, Van Ekeris L, Tu C, Silverman DN and Linser PJ. 2004.  Alkalization of larval mosquito midgut and the role of carbonic anhydrase in different  species of mosquitoes.Comp Biochem Physiol Part C, 137, 207-225.
 
                
                - Dadd  RH. 1975. Alkalinity within the midgut of mosquito larvae with alkaline-active  digestive enzymes. J Insect Physiol, 21,1847-1853.
 
                
                - Dissanayake  SN, Marinotti O, Ribeiro JM, and James AA. 2006. angaGEDUCI: Anopheles gambiae  gene expression database with integrated comparative algorithms for identifying  conserved DNA motifs in promoter sequences. BMC Genomics, 7, 116-127.
 
                
                - del  Pilar Corena M, Seron TJ, Lehman HK et al. 2002. Carbonic anhydrase in the midgut  of larval Aedes aegypti: cloning, localization and inhibition. J Exp Biol, 205,  591-602.
 
                
                - Elbashir  SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K and Tuschl T. 2001. Duplexes of  21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature,  411, 494-498.
 
                
                - Franz  AW, Sanchez-Vargas I, Adelman ZN et al. 2006. Engineering RNA interference-based  resistance to dengue virus type 2 in genetically modified Aedes aegypti. Proc  Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 4198-203.
 
                
                - Hansen  IA, Sieglaff DH, Munro JB et al. 2007. Forkhead transcription factors regulate  mosquito reproduction. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 37, 985-997.
 
                
                - Keene  KM, Foy BD, Sanchez-Vargas I, Beaty BJ, Blair CD and Olson KE. 2004. RNA  interference acts as a natural antiviral response to O'nyong-nyong virus  (Alphavirus; Togaviridae) infection of Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci  USA, 101, 17240-17245.
 
                
                - Konet  DS, Anderson J, Piper J, Akkina R, Suchman E and Carlson J. 2007. Short-hairpin  RNA expressed from
 
                
                - polymerase  III promoters mediates RNA interference in mosquito cells. Insect Mol Biol, 16,  199-206.
 
                
                - Lu  R, Li H, Li WX, and Ding SW. 2004. RNA-based immunity in insects. In: S.H. Gillespie,  GL Smith and A Osbourn, Editors, Society for General Microbiology Symposium 63:Microbe  Vector Interactions in Vector-borne Diseases,   Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 63-74.
 
                
                - Miller  SC, Brown SJ and Tomoyasu Y. 2008. Larval RNAi in Drosophila? Dev Genes Evol,  218, 505-510.
 
                
                - Neira  Oviedo M, Van Ekeris L, Corena-Mcleod MDP and Linser PJ. 2008. A microarray-based  analysis of transcriptional compartmentalization in the alimentary canal of  Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae. Insect Mol Biol, 17, 61-72.
 
                
                - Pfaffl  MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time  RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 2002-2007.
 
                
                - Pudney  M, Varma MGR and Leake CJ. 1979. Establishment of cell lines from larvae of  culicine (Aedes species) and
 
                
                - Anopheline  mosquitoes. TCA Manual, 5, 997-1002.
 
                
                - Roy  SG, Hansen IA and Raikhel AS. 2007. Effect of insulin and 20-hydroxyecdysone in  the fat body of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol  Biol, 37, 1317-1326.
 
                
                - Seron  TJ, Hill J and Linser PJ. 2004. A GPI-linked carbonic anhydrase expressed in  the larval mosquito midgut. J Exp Biol, 207(Pt 26), 4559-4572.
 
                
                - Smith  KE, Van Ekeris LA and Linser PJ. 2007. Cloning and characterization of AgCA9, a  novel W-carbonic anhydrase from Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera:  Culicidae) larvae. J Exp Biol, 210, 3919-3930.
 
                
                - Zhao  T, Li G, Mi S, Li S, Hannon GJ, Wang XJ, and Qi Y. 2007.A complex system of  small RNAs in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas  reinhardtii. Genes Dev, 21, 1190-1203.
 
             
           |