Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics (2022) Volume 6, Issue 5

Peritoneal Dialysis: Preparation, Process and Technique

Samuel Evans*

Department of Nephrology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

*Corresponding Author:
Samuel Evans
Department of Nephrology
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University
Dhaka, Bangladesh

Received: 23-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. AACNT-22-73761; Editor assigned: 25-Aug-2022, PreQC No. AACNT-22-73761(PQ); Reviewed: 08-Sep-2022, QC No. AACNT-22-73761; Revised: 13-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. AACNT-22-73761(R); Published: 20-Sep-2022, DOI: 10.35841/aacnt-6.5.124

Citation: Evans S. Peritoneal dialysis: Preparation, process and technique. J Clin Nephrol Ther. 2022;6(5):124

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics


Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) is utilized by fewer than 7% of dialysis patients in the United States. In Canada, in excess of 50% of dialysis patients utilize peritoneal dialysis. A few observational investigations, including public libraries from various regions of the planet, have revealed superior early endurance of patients utilizing peritoneal dialysis contrasted with those utilizing hemodialysis [1].

Patients have a decision while starting dialysis to utilize HD or PD. Decision ought to show restraint focused and made after cautious contemplations of all factors that might modify results. An enormous US companion investigation of more than 6000 matched sets of dialysis patients starting dialysis in 2003, showed that 1-year patient endurance was fundamentally higher for PD when contrasted with HD (85.8% versus 80.7% (p< 0.01)). Notwithstanding, 80% of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients in the United States start hemodialysis with a Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter (TDC), and 60% keep on dialyzing involving a HDC for 91 days after dialysis commencement. This underlying catheter (methodology) decision significantly affects the mortality of ESRD patients. Patient mortality in the initial 90 days of HD because of catheter-related bacteremia and sepsis from TDC use is higher when contrasted with patients starting dialysis on PD. A critical level of deaths in HD happened inside the main the 90 days on dialysis.


PD is contraindicated in patients with [2]:

• Uncorrected stomach wall hernia

• Pleuroperitoneal shunt

• Abdominal attachments

PD catheter placement

Using a few distinct methods, the achievement pace of PDC situation detailed in literature fluctuated from 80% to 100 percent. Are there any distinctions in catheter results in light of the strategy used to put PDC? The solution to this question is troublesome, as there are wide varieties in understanding and administrator factors that can't be controlled across populaces. Generally speaking, open careful position was related with the largest number of entanglements, including unfortunate capability, holes, and catheter movements; there was a pattern toward higher catheter endurance after laparoscopic inclusion [3].

Both surgical and percutaneous methods have low complication rates when performed by experienced administrators. Obese patients who have had past abdominal medical procedure or with past episodes of PD-related peritonitis can profit from advance laparoscopic situation of the catheter. Surgical PD catheter implantation ordinarily takes more time, including reference and consultation postponements to a specialist, working room planning, and preoperative clinical and sedation freedom. Conversely, nephrology-directed PD catheter position can be performed generally rapidly, for the most part under method sedation absence of pain in a short term setting. This is especially helpful in an intense developing setting with a somewhat short window of notice expected before dialysis commencement.


Peritoneal dialysis benefit: Beginning dialysis with a PDC is desirable over a HDC regarding patient morbidity, mortality, and cost. Annual Data Report from the United States Renal Data System likewise shows an essentially better changed likelihood of 5-year endurance with PD contrasted with HD. This early endurance, generally, might be made sense of by determination predisposition on the grounds that better patients might be bound to pick PD as their methodology. Patients with comorbid conditions will quite often begin HD after an intense sickness and have high early mortality that is wrongly credited to their HD methodology [4].

Two ongoing examinations from Canada attempted to address the determination predisposition in PD results. The study concentrated on patients who had something like 4 months of circle back to nephrologists and had an elective short term beginning of dialysis. There was no distinction in 2-year mortality among PD and HD, and in patients without diabetes, PD was related with an endurance benefit that reached out past 2 years of follow-up. Likewise, looking at episode ESRD patients in Canada, noticed 80% expanded chance of death in patients beginning HD utilizing a Central Venous Catheters (CVCs) however no distinction in mortality among PD and HD utilizing AVF or Arteriovenous Graft (AVG) for dialysis.


Peritoneal dialysis is one of the modalities used for dialysis. There are a few benefits of PD versus HD. Patients utilizing PD won't have to venture out from home each and every day to get dialysis; rather they play out their medicines at home involving an exceptionally straightforward rule for eliminating toxins from their body.

Patients chose for PD will go through PD catheter situation utilizing one of the few strategies depicted previously. When the catheter has mended, they go through strategy preparing at a dialysis unit for 2 to 3 weeks, learning the legitimate aseptic procedure to involve the catheter for dialysis. The premise of toxins expulsion in PD is dispersion of uremic poisons out of the blood through the peritoneal layer into the peritoneal liquid that is then disposed of after a predetermined measure of time in the peritoneal cavity [5].

The course of PD can be computerized utilizing a basic machine joined to peritoneal dialysis liquid sacks. The machine is modified to implant the foreordained volume of liquid into the peritoneal cavity, stay liquid in the peritoneal cavity for a predefined time frame, and consequently channel the liquid. Cycles are repeated a few times on basis of patient’s needs and peritoneal film dissemination qualities. Manual trades require the establishment and depleting of liquid to be performed by the patient, rehashing the interaction a few times during the day to accomplish the necessary clearance of toxins.


  1. Niang A, Iyengar A, Luyckx VA. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis in resource-limited settings. Curr Opin Nephrol Hyp. 2018;27(6):463-71.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Sachdeva B, Abreo K. The history of interventional nephrology. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009;16(5):302-8.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Liu P, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ, et al. Association between duration of predialysis care and mortality after dialysis start. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(6):893-9.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Morelle J, Sow A, Fustin CA, et al. Mechanisms of crystalloid versus colloid osmosis across the peritoneal membrane. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(7):1875-86.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Szeto CC, Li PK, Johnson DW, et al. ISPD catheter-related infection recommendations: 2017 update. Perit Dial Int. 2017;37(2):141-54.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App