Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Perspective - Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures (2023) Volume 7, Issue 5

Pediatric metanephric adenoma with fanconi-bickel condition: A rare challenge

Daniel Hollon*

Department of Surgical Sciences

*Corresponding Author:
Daniel Hollon
Department of Surgical Sciences
National University

Received:25-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. AACRSIP-23-112554; Editor assigned:28-Aug-2023, PreQC No. AACRSIP-23-112554(PQ); Reviewed:11-Sept-2023, QC No. AACRSIP-23-112554; Revised:16-Sept-2023, Manuscript No. AACRSIP-23-112554(R); Published:23-Sept-2023, DOI:10.35841/aacrsip-7.5.162

Citation: Hollon D. Pediatric metanephric adenoma with fanconi-bickel condition: A rare challenge. Case Rep Surg Invasive Proced. 2023;7(5):162

Visit for more related articles at Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures


Pediatric metanephric adenoma is an uncommon and often benign renal tumor that primarily affects children. When this tumor is diagnosed in conjunction with Fanconi-Bickel syndrome, a rare metabolic disorder, it presents unique challenges in both diagnosis and management. In this article, we will explore the intricacies of pediatric metanephric adenoma and its association with Fanconi-Bickel condition, shedding light on the complexities faced by patients and healthcare professionals [1].

Metanephric adenoma is a rare subtype of renal tumor, and it is even rarer when it occurs in pediatric patients. This tumor is believed to originate from the metanephric blastema, a structure crucial in the development of the kidneys. While it is generally considered a benign tumor, there have been instances of malignant transformation. Pediatric metanephric adenoma often presents as a renal mass, and symptoms may include abdominal pain, hematuria (blood in the urine), or an abdominal mass that can be palpated by a healthcare provider [2].

Diagnosing metanephric adenoma can be challenging due to its rarity and the need to differentiate it from other renal tumors, both benign and malignant. Imaging studies, such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are essential for evaluation. Additionally, a biopsy may be required to confirm the diagnosis. Fanconi-Bickel syndrome, also known as glycogen storage disease XI, is an extremely rare autosomal recessive disorder. It is characterized by a defective glucose transporter protein, resulting in impaired glucose uptake and utilization by various tissues and organs. This leads to a range of symptoms, including hepatomegaly (enlarged liver), growth retardation, and renal dysfunction. Fanconi-Bickel syndrome is caused by mutations in the SLC2A2 gene, which codes for the glucose transporter protein GLUT2 [3].

One of the key features of Fanconi-Bickel syndrome is renal tubular dysfunction, which can lead to a condition known as renal Fanconi syndrome. In this syndrome, the renal tubules are unable to reabsorb essential nutrients and electrolytes, resulting in excessive loss of glucose, amino acids, bicarbonate, and other substances in the urine. This can lead to growth retardation and bone deformities, among other complications. The coexistence of pediatric metanephric adenoma and Fanconi-Bickel syndrome is an exceedingly rare occurrence. It presents a medical conundrum because the symptoms of both conditions can overlap, making it challenging to distinguish between them. For instance, the presence of hematuria and an abdominal mass can be attributed to either the renal tumor or the renal dysfunction associated with Fanconi-Bickel syndrome [4].

The diagnosis often involves a multidisciplinary approach, with input from pediatric nephrologists, pediatric oncologists, and radiologists. Comprehensive evaluation, including imaging studies, renal function tests, genetic testing, and biopsy, may be necessary to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Treatment decisions are guided by the extent of the tumor, its potential for malignancy, and the overall health of the child. In some cases, surgical resection of the tumor may be required, while the management of Fanconi-Bickel syndrome necessitates ongoing supportive care and dietary modifications [5].


Pediatric metanephric adenoma with Fanconi-Bickel syndrome is an exceedingly rare medical condition that presents unique diagnostic and management challenges. The coexistence of a renal tumor and a metabolic disorder complicates the clinical picture and underscores the importance of a thorough and multidisciplinary approach to care. As our understanding of these rare conditions advances, healthcare professionals can better navigate the complexities and provide tailored treatment strategies to ensure the best possible outcomes for affected children. Despite its rarity, this intersection of conditions highlights the importance of continued research and collaboration in the field of pediatric nephrology and oncology to improve the diagnosis and management of such complex cases.


Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Konety BR, HORD JD, WEINER ES, et al. Embryonal adenoma of the kidney associated with polycythemia and von Willebrand disease. J Urol. 1998;160(6):2171-4.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. McNeil JC, Corbett ST, Kuruvilla S, et al. Metanephric adenoma in a five-year-old boy presenting with chyluria: case report and review of literature. Urology. 2008;72(3):545-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Siffring CW, Klein RL, Kastelic JE, et al. The detection of occult renal tumors in children by elevated hematocrit on routine complete blood count: a report of two cases. J Pediatr Sur. 1992;27(12):1616-7

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Andre M, et al. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol. 2004;171(5):1802-5.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App