Journal of Translational Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Perspective - Journal of Translational Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 3

Modernizing clinical trials: Technology, engagement, diversity

Rachel Adams*

Department of Clinical Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

*Corresponding Author:
Rachel Adams
Department of Clinical Research
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
E-mail: r.adams@auckland.ac.nz

Received : 03-Jul-2025, Manuscript No. aatr-193; Editor assigned : 07-Jul-2025, PreQC No. aatr-193(PQ); Reviewed : 25-Jul-2025, QC No aatr-193; Revised : 05-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. aatr-193(R); Published : 14-Aug-2025 , DOI : 10.35841/aatr-9.3.193

Citation: Adams R. Modernizing clinical trials: Technology, engagement, diversity. aatr. 2025;09(03):193.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Translational Research

Introduction

Decentralized clinical trials are transforming drug development by reducing patient burden and increasing access. They leverage technology for remote data collection and monitoring, which means better patient retention and broader geographic reach. This approach addresses common recruitment and logistical hurdles in traditional trials, though it introduces new considerations for data security and regulatory oversight [1].

Artificial intelligence offers significant opportunities to enhance clinical trial efficiency, from patient recruitment and protocol design to data analysis. By automating tasks and identifying patterns, AI can accelerate timelines and improve decision-making. However, integrating AI also brings challenges related to data quality, ethical considerations, and the need for robust validation [2].

Engaging patients effectively in clinical trials is crucial for success, impacting everything from recruitment to study design relevance. We've seen that clear communication, a focus on patient benefits, and shared decision-making are strong facilitators. On the flip side, complex protocols and lack of transparency can be real barriers to meaningful patient participation [3].

Adaptive clinical trial designs are gaining traction because they allow for flexibility during a study, such as adjusting sample size or treatment arms based on accumulating data. This means more efficient use of resources and a higher chance of identifying effective treatments. The key here is balancing this flexibility with maintaining statistical rigor and clear regulatory pathways [4].

The integration of real-world evidence (RWE) into clinical trials is a hot topic, offering insights into treatment effectiveness and safety in routine practice. What this really means is augmenting traditional trial data with information from electronic health records or registries. It can help refine study populations and generate hypotheses, but it does come with data quality and generalizability challenges that need careful handling [5].

Conducting clinical trials during public health emergencies presents unique ethical dilemmas, especially concerning informed consent, resource allocation, and equitable access. The priority shifts to rapid response, but it's essential to uphold participant protections. We need clear frameworks to navigate these situations, ensuring that urgency doesn't compromise ethical standards [6].

Digital biomarkers are reshaping clinical trials by offering continuous, objective measurements of physiological and behavioral data. Think wearables and smartphone apps. This technology allows for more nuanced insights into disease progression and treatment response outside of clinic visits. The challenge is in standardizing these measurements and ensuring their validity across diverse populations [7].

Master protocols represent an efficient approach to drug development, especially in areas like oncology. Instead of separate trials for each drug or population, these umbrella or platform trials test multiple interventions under a single overarching protocol. This means faster evaluation of new therapies and quicker identification of promising candidates, making the whole process more streamlined [8].

Improving diversity in clinical trials is not just an ethical imperative; it's essential for generalizability of results. Here's the thing: treatments can work differently across various demographic groups. Strategies include community engagement, culturally sensitive recruitment materials, and reducing logistical barriers. This ensures trial findings are relevant and applicable to a broader patient population [9].

Biomarkers are key drivers in oncology clinical trials, helping to select patients most likely to respond to a specific therapy, monitor treatment effectiveness, and predict prognosis. This precision medicine approach means more targeted treatments and better outcomes for patients. The ongoing challenge is validating new biomarkers and integrating them seamlessly into clinical practice and trial design [10].

 

Conclusion

Clinical trials are undergoing significant modernization, leveraging technologies like Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCTs) to reduce patient burden and expand access through remote data collection and monitoring. This approach improves patient retention and broadens geographic reach. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is also streamlining processes from recruitment to data analysis, enhancing efficiency but also raising concerns about data quality, ethics, and validation. Effective patient engagement, characterized by clear communication, focusing on patient benefits, and shared decision-making, is crucial for trial success. Concurrently, efforts to improve diversity in clinical trials are essential for ensuring broader applicability of results, especially as treatments can vary across demographic groups. Adaptive designs offer flexibility during a study, optimizing resource use and increasing the chances of identifying effective treatments. The integration of Real-World Evidence (RWE) and digital biomarkers provides richer, continuous insights into treatment effects in real-life settings, despite challenges in data quality and standardization. Master protocols are making drug development more efficient by testing multiple interventions under a single framework, accelerating therapy evaluation. Ethical considerations, particularly during public health crises, demand clear guidelines to protect participants while enabling rapid response. Ultimately, precision medicine approaches, like biomarker-driven oncology trials, are tailoring therapies for better patient outcomes, highlighting the continuous need for biomarker validation and integration into practice.

References

  1. Neha M, Mugdha P, Aditi P. Decentralized Clinical Trials: A Comprehensive Review of Concepts, Benefits, and Challenges. Perspect Clin Res. 2022;13(3):111-118.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  2. Tong H, Shu T, Fei L. Artificial intelligence in clinical trials: opportunities and challenges. Trials. 2023;24(1):440.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. José AS, Cristina A, Ana B. Patient engagement in clinical trials: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Health Expect. 2022;25(6):2686-2701.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  4. Jussara AK, Gislaine S, Adna MS. Adaptive designs for clinical trials: an updated overview. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:e94.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Hans-Georg E, Bernhard B, Susanne S. Integrating real-world evidence into clinical trials: considerations and challenges. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5(3):e164-e172.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  6. Santosh KS, Rajeev K, Ravi KP. Ethical considerations for conducting clinical trials during public health emergencies. Indian J Med Ethics. 2020;5(4):260-264.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Mahwish P, Samira A, Amna A. The role of digital biomarkers in clinical trials: a systematic review. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023;16(12):1119-1130.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  8. Mahesh KBP, Christopher JW, Matthew RS. Master Protocols: An Efficient Approach to Drug Development. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(11):1060-1070.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Onyebuchi KD, Tosin A, Maurice SM. Strategies to improve diversity in clinical trials: A systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023;126:107099.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  10. Pavan MK, Pariya K, Preston LU. Biomarker-driven clinical trials in oncology: current landscape and future directions. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10(5):1007-1017.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Get the App