Mini Review - Journal Clinical Psychiatry and Cognitive Psychology (2025) Volume 9, Issue 3

Leadership: Styles, psychology, and impact

Meera Lyer^*

Department of Southbridge Clinical Psychiatry, Institute of Republic of Indira, UK

*Corresponding Author:

Meera Lyer
Department of Southbridge Clinical Psychiatry
Institute of Republic of Indira, UK.
E-mail: raul.ortega@gmail.com

Received : 03-Jul-2025, Manuscript No. AACPCP-25-228; Editor assigned : 07-Jul-2025, PreQC No. AACPCP-25-228(PQ); Reviewed : 25-Jul-2025, QC No AACPCP-25-228; Revised : 05-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. AACPCP-25-228(R); Published : 14-Aug-2025 , DOI : 10.35841/AACPCP-9.3.228

Citation: Lyer M. Leadership: Styles, psychology, and impact. J Clin Psychiatry Cog Psychol. 2025;09(03):228.

Introduction

Understanding effective leadership is paramount in modern organizations, with various styles and traits contributing to diverse outcomes. Transformational leadership, for instance, significantly fosters innovation by highlighting the crucial mediating roles of psychological safety and creative self-efficacy. Leaders who inspire and empower their teams create an environment where individuals feel safe to express ideas and believe in their capacity to innovate, ultimately boosting organizational creativity [1].

Another critical aspect is emotional intelligence. A meta-analysis confirms the robust link between emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness, showing that leaders who accurately perceive, understand, and manage emotions—both their own and others'—are consistently more successful in various leadership outcomes, emphasizing Emotional Intelligence (EI) as a critical skill for contemporary leadership [2].

Ethical leadership also plays a vital role. Research reveals how ethical leadership significantly boosts employee well-being, highlighting that when leaders act ethically, they cultivate psychological safety and a sense of meaningfulness in work, which in turn leads to improved employee mental health and overall satisfaction [3].

The concept of servant leadership further contributes to positive employee outcomes. This style promotes employee thriving by enhancing psychological capital, specifically hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism. Leaders who prioritize serving others create a supportive environment where employees feel empowered and develop personal resources to flourish [4].

Similarly, authentic leadership has a positive influence on employees' psychological well-being. Leaders who are true to themselves foster a work environment where employees find their work meaningful and feel a sense of thriving, contributing to better mental health outcomes [5].

Emerging fields also shed light on leadership. The field of leadership neuroscience explores how insights from brain science inform our understanding of leadership processes. It discusses neural mechanisms underlying decision-making, emotional regulation, and social cognition in leaders, pointing towards future applications for leadership development [6].

Furthermore, positive psychological capital (PsyCap), comprising hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism, makes a significant contribution to effective leadership development. Fostering these psychological resources in leaders can lead to improved performance, well-being, and organizational outcomes [7].

However, not all leadership traits are beneficial. The "dark triad" traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—are explored in the context of leadership. While sometimes associated with initial career success, these personality traits often lead to dysfunctional leadership behaviors, negative team dynamics, and detrimental organizational outcomes in the long run [8].

On a more positive note, inclusive leadership fosters employee voice, with psychological safety acting as a key mediator. Leaders who embrace diversity and promote fair treatment create an environment where employees feel safe to share ideas and concerns without fear of negative repercussions, enhancing organizational learning and innovation [9].

Finally, mindful leadership demonstrates its value by enhancing employee well-being through building psychological capital. Leaders who cultivate mindfulness create a more positive and resilient work environment, empowering employees with greater hope, self-efficacy, and optimism, ultimately leading to improved well-being [10].

Conclusion

Leadership studies reveal diverse approaches influencing organizational and individual outcomes. Transformational leadership fuels innovation by establishing psychological safety and enhancing creative self-efficacy, fostering an environment where ideas flourish. Similarly, Emotional Intelligence (EI) is a cornerstone of effective leadership, enabling leaders to skillfully manage emotions for superior performance. Ethical leadership significantly elevates employee well-being, creating meaningful work experiences and a secure psychological space. Servant leadership further contributes to employee thriving, building vital psychological capital such as hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism, empowering individuals to flourish. Authentic leadership also plays a crucial role in psychological well-being, promoting meaningful work and a sense of thriving. Beyond specific styles, broader concepts shape leadership dynamics. Positive Psychological Capital (PsyCap), encompassing hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism, is essential for leadership development, leading to improved performance and well-being. Inclusive leadership fosters employee voice and organizational learning by ensuring psychological safety, allowing for open expression without fear. Mindful leadership, through cultivating mindfulness, also builds psychological capital and enhances employee well-being. However, the field also acknowledges the darker aspects; traits like narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, collectively known as the "Dark Triad," often lead to dysfunctional behaviors and negative organizational impacts. Insights from leadership neuroscience further illuminate decision-making and emotional regulation, offering new avenues for development. These findings collectively underscore the multifaceted nature of leadership and its profound impact on individuals and organizations.

References

1. Ying M, Ting S, Qian C. Transformational leadership and innovation: The mediating role of psychological safety and creative self-efficacy. J Organ Behav. 2022;43(7):1198-1215.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. Dana LJ, Daniel AN, Carolyn M. Emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(2):182-208.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. Badrul A, Sohail C, Sohail J. Ethical Leadership and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety and Psychological Meaningfulness. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5957.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. Pei KH, Qi Z, Jian LL. Servant leadership and employee thriving: A moderated mediation model of psychological capital and resilience. Front Psychol. 2021;12:702758.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. Shahid SB, Tahir A, Madiha J. Authentic Leadership and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Meaningful Work and Thriving at Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8746.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. David AW, Pierre AB, Andrew JK. Neuroscience of leadership: Review and future directions. Leadership Q. 2019;30(1):144-162.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. James BA, Fred L, Carolyn MY. The role of positive psychological capital in leadership development: A meta-analysis. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2020;27(1):1-19.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. Erik G, Peter DH, Daniel AN. The dark side of leadership: A review of the dark triad in leadership. J Organ Behav. 2022;43(1):3-21.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. Hua J, Jinyao W, Yanli Y. Inclusive leadership and employee voice: The mediating role of psychological safety. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1118671.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

1. Mareé R, Jarrod MH, Fred L. Mindful Leadership and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. J Bus Ethics. 2021;170(2):343-357.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref