Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-7360-538437

Short Communication - Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures (2022) Volume 6, Issue 1

IVC filter removal following implantation time and single-stage resection with intraoperative filter placement.

Graham Cassiusnum*

Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8039, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Graham Cassiusnum
Department of Surgery,
Yale University School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT 06520-8039, USA
E-mai: [email protected]

Received: 23-Dec-2021, Manuscript No. AACRSIP-22-54193; Editor assigned: 27- Dec-2021, PreQC No. AACRSIP-22-54193(PQ); Reviewed: 10-Jan-2022, QC No. AACRSIP-22-54193; Revised: 13-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. AACRSIP-22-54193(R); Published: 20-Jan-2022, DOI:10.35841/aacrsip- 6.1.104

Citation: Cassiusnum G. IVC filter removal following implantation time and single-stage resection with intraoperative filter placement. Case Rep Surg Invasive Proced. 2022; 6(1):104


IVC filter, Single-stage resection.

Visit for more related articles at Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures


Most patients have a period restricted sign for second rate vena cava filtration. Whenever the sign has terminated, a retrievable second rate vena cava channel ought to be taken out percutaneously, except if the dangers of recovery offset the advantages. Over the long haul, long haul inhabiting substandard vena cava channels might encounter difficulties, like swagger infiltration, relocation, apoplexy, slant, break, and second rate vena cava stenosis. Long haul inhabiting retrievable second rate vena cava channels might become installed in the mass of the mediocre vena cava, making percutaneous recovery troublesome. Be that as it may, this isn't consistently the situation, and they likewise might be effectively and securely eliminated utilizing basic procedures.


The utilization of IVC in high-hazard patients for PE without DVT is profoundly dubious. Albeit ongoing agreement rules advise against prophylactic channels in the injury patient without recorded lower limit DVT, prophylactic IVC channels are as yet mentioned in high-hazard patients.

The current standard strategy for bedside IVC channel situation uses either versatile C arm, trans-stomach ultrasound (US) or IVUS in recumbent patients. Specialized achievement has been accounted for up to 97% for transabdominal US directed channel situation, but cautious patient determination should be carried out as persistent body habitus, position, inside gas, all add to fundamental perceivability for legitimate channel deployment.18 One review showed almost 12% of patients were not possibility for safe transabdominal US directed channel arrangement, and in these patients IVUS is every now and again the following choice if available.18 Technical achievement rates for IVUS conveyed channels relies upon the administrators experience and has been accounted for at high as 99%.3 Data contrasting these techniques is restricted, but it has been proposed that channel malposition and channel slant are higher in IVUS directed position contrasted with traditional fluoroscopy [1].

Patient situating for channel organization can introduce an extra test. Both standard channel situation and transabdominal US directed channel arrangements favor the patient in a prostrate position. In this review, patients couldn't lay recumbent because of ICP prerequisites and had the head of bed raised to at least 30°. In these patients, DR bedside direction was fruitful in precisely sending channels with insignificant confusions.

While surveying for position of bedside channels under DR direction, as a standard catheter venography isn't played out, the interventionalist needs to painstakingly audit late CT outputs of the midsection with differentiation to recognize the level of the renal veins and the caval bifurcation, preclude DVT and distinguish potential anatomic caval variations. As opposed to transabdominal US or IVUS, renal veins are not envisioned at the hour of situation, and accordingly a vertebral body is chosen to stamp the level of the most minimal renal vein before the method [2].

Expected traps of putting bedside channels with DR incorporate IVC channel slant, malposition or IVC hole. These confusions can be pinpointed to a couple of key stages. Pulling the sheath back too low normally brings about malposition. On the off chance that the sheath is progressed with the channel set up, or on the other hand assuming the channel is at the same time progressed while the sheath is pulled back, the channel might be put either excessively high, or may bring about IVC hole [2].

Substandard vena cava (IVC) channel situation is a viable treatment to diminish the gamble of pneumonic embolism uncommonly in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who can't get anticoagulation.1,2 Timely evacuation of retrievable IVC channels is vital as delayed stay time prompts various intricacies. A typical intricacy is the swagger entrance into contiguous constructions including aorta, vertebral body, kidney and liver parenchyma, the digestive organs (most regularly the duodenum), entry and renal veins, and urinary plot.

Aspiratory embolism (PE) is a significant reason for horribleness and mortality in the United States and normally happens optional to venous thromboembolism. The current norm of therapy for venous thromboembolism prompting PE is clinical anticoagulation treatment. Be that as it may, certain patients in danger of creating PE have either a contraindication to anticoagulation (eg., ongoing discharge, late medical procedure), intricacy of anticoagulation, or experience a disappointment of anticoagulation. Second rate vena cava (IVC) channels are insignificantly intrusive mechanical gadgets put into the IVC of patients who can't be treated with anticoagulation. Since IVC channels can possibly stay inside the body overstretched timeframes, complexities can happen, for example, caval divider entrance, relocation, apoplexy, slant, crack, and IVC stenosis. These potential inconveniences have focused on late accentuation of IVC channel evacuation, particularly when the channel is not generally shown. Notwithstanding, the very confusions related with longer channel abide times provide numerous suppliers opportunity to stop and think as it connects with evacuation, regardless of a few progressed methods for channel expulsion distributed in the writing [3].

The longest retrievable Günther-Tulip IVC channel (Cook Medical Corp., Bloomington, IN) has stayed set up before percutaneous expulsion has been 15.5 years. We present an instance of a routine, fruitful percutaneous IVC channel evacuation with an abide season of 6033 days. Pneumonic embolus and venous thromboembolic infection stays one of the most unsettling preventable occasions in an individual's emergency clinic stay. The assessed occurrence of aspiratory embolism is 60-70 out of 100,000, with venous apoplexy being just about as high as 124 out of 100,000 in everybody; with an expected mortality as high as 30% whenever left untreated. Pharmacologic prophylactic anticoagulation is the backbone of treatment for this issue, yet there are clinical circumstances which contraindicate the utilization of these prescriptions, and subsequently, it is important to consider sending of an IVC channel. With the appearance of impermanent and removable channels, it became conceivable to put these gadgets during the hour of the best danger for pneumonic embolism with the arrangement to eliminate them when the patient is no longer at an expanded gamble. In spite of the fact that there are signs for extremely durable channel arrangement, the truth of the matter is a considerable lot of the channels that are intended to be impermanent wind up becoming long-lasting.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) includes 2% to 3% of threatening infections in grown-ups. A novel component of RCC is expansion of growth into the second rate vena cava (IVC). Growth blood clot will happen in 4% to 10% of cases. The norm of care is extremist nephrectomy with caval thrombectomy. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) contains 2% to 3% of harmful sicknesses in grown-ups. A one of a kind element of RCC is augmentation of growth into the second rate vena cava (IVC). Growth blood clot will happen in 4% to 10% of cases. The norm of care is extremist nephrectomy with caval thrombectomy [4].


  1. Michael VW. The role of natural cycle IVF in assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;33(1):35-45.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Daisuke H, Satoru M, Luciano C, et al. A practical approach to assessing stent results with IVUS or OCT. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018;14(1):32-41.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Ganguli S, Hawkins BM, Abtahian F, et al. Comparison of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Placed at the Bedside Via Intravenous Ultrasound Guidance Versus Fluoroscopic Guidance. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017; 39:250-55.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Mahmood SS, Abtahian F, Fogerty AE, et al. Anticoagulation is associated with decreased inferior vena cava filter-related complications in patients with metastatic carcinoma. Am J Med. 2017;130:77-82.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App