Perspective - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Integrating Neurophysiological Insights into Public Health Strategies for Neurodegenerative Disease Prevention

Department of Neurophysiology, University of Lyon Medical School, France.

*Corresponding Author:

Sophie Laurent
Department of Neurophysiology
University of Lyon Medical School, France.
E-mail: s.laurent@univ-lyon.fr

Received: 03-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-25-169492; Editor assigned: 04-Apr-2025, PreQC No. AAPHPP-25-169492(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Apr-2025, QC No AAPHPP-25-169492; Revised: 21-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-25-169492(R); Published: 28-Apr-2025, DOI:10.35841/aaphpp -9.2.290

Citation: Laurent S. Integrating neurophysiological insights into public health strategies for neurodegenerative disease prevention. J Public Health Policy Plan. 2025;9(2):290.

Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) present growing global health challenges as populations age. Emerging neurophysiological research has deepened our understanding of the early biomarkers and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these disorders. By detecting changes in neural oscillations, synaptic function, and cortical connectivity before overt symptoms arise, neurophysiology offers a valuable toolkit for early intervention. Public health policy can leverage these insights to implement large-scale screening programs, targeting at-risk populations to slow or prevent disease onset [1].

Electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and functional MRI have proven instrumental in identifying subtle alterations in brain function that precede structural degeneration. These technologies could form the foundation of preventive care strategies, supported by policy-driven subsidies to ensure accessibility. Incorporating neurophysiological assessments into primary healthcare could enable timely lifestyle interventions, pharmacological therapies, or cognitive training, improving long-term neurological health outcomes. Policymakers could also fund mobile neurodiagnostic units to reach underserved or rural communities [2].

Preventive public health strategies should also address modifiable risk factors linked to neurodegenerative disease progression. These include physical inactivity, poor nutrition, and chronic stress—all of which exert measurable effects on neurophysiological markers such as cortical excitability and neural synchrony. Public campaigns could promote exercise, balanced diets, and mindfulness-based stress reduction, reinforced by community programs that demonstrate neurophysiological benefits. Incentivizing participation in such programs may increase adoption rates and yield measurable improvements in brain health indicators [3].

Data integration across healthcare systems can further amplify the benefits of neurophysiology-informed policy. Linking neurophysiological test results with epidemiological and genetic data can help refine risk models, allowing for precision public health approaches. Policymakers could support the creation of secure, interoperable databases for longitudinal tracking, enabling researchers to evaluate the impact of preventive measures on population-level brain health over decades. This evidence can then guide adjustments to policy and funding priorities [4].

Finally, the success of such strategies depends on capacity building and public trust. Training healthcare professionals in the interpretation of neurophysiological data ensures accurate risk communication and patient engagement. Transparent public education campaigns explaining the role of neurophysiology in prevention can foster trust and encourage proactive health behaviors. International collaboration in research and policy development will be essential to address the global burden of neurodegenerative diseases effectively [5].

Conclusion

Integrating neurophysiological insights into public health planning for neurodegenerative disease prevention holds the promise of earlier detection, more effective interventions, and improved population brain health. By aligning policies with the biological realities of disease progression, societies can better prepare for the challenges posed by an aging population and reduce the human and economic toll of these devastating disorders.

References

1. Di Costanzo A, Trojsi F, Tosetti M, et al. High-field proton MRS of human brain. Eur J Radiol. 2003;48(2):146-53.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007;15(3):277-90.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Rovira A, Cordoba J, Sanpedro F, et al. Normalization of T2 signal abnormalities in hemispheric white matter with liver transplant. Neurology. 2002;59(3):335-41.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Rovira A, Grivé E, Pedraza S, et al. Magnetization transfer ratio values and proton MR spectroscopy of normal-appearing cerebral white matter in patients with liver cirrhosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(6):1137-42.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

5. Hajnal JV, Baudouin CJ, Oatridge A, et al. Design and implementation of magnetization transfer pulse sequences for clinical use. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16(1):7-18.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref