Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Opinion Article - Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology (2022) Volume 6, Issue 6

Identification of genetic variation in brassica oleracea.

Vishwa Sarmah*

Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Dibrugarh University, Assam, India

*Corresponding Author:
Vishwa Sarmah
Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics
Dibrugarh University, Assam, India

Received: 28-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. AAGMB-22-81449; Editor assigned: 31-Oct-2022, PreQC No. AAGMB-22-81449(PQ); Reviewed: 12-Nov-2022, QC No. AAGMB-22-81449; Revised: 17-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. AAGMB-22-81449(R); Published: 24-Nov-2022, DOI:10.35841/aagmb-6.6.126

Citation: Sarmah V. Identification of genetic variation in brassica oleracea. J Genet Mol Biol. 2022;6(6):126

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology


Brassica oleracea incorporates a few morphologically different, financially vital vegetable crops, such as the cauliflower and cabbage. In any case, hereditary variations, particularly huge basic variations (SVs), that underlie the extraordinary morphological differing qualities of B. oleracea stay to a great extent unexplored. Auxiliary variations (SVs) counting additions, erasures, duplications, and translocations are plenteous all through plant genomes and are more likely to cause phenotype changes than single nucleotide polymorphisms


Morphology, Genome, Auxiliary variations.


Polyploidization has given much hereditary variety for plant versatile advancement, but the components by which the atomic advancement of polyploid genomes builds up hereditary engineering basic species separation are vague. Brassica is an perfect show to extend information of polyploid advancement. Here we depict a draft genome arrangement of Brassica oleracea, comparing it with that of its sister species B. rapa to uncover various chromosome improvements and hilter kilter quality misfortune in copied genomic squares, deviated intensification of transposable components, differential quality co-retention for particular pathways and variety in quality expression, counting elective grafting, among a huge number of paralogous and orthologous qualities [1].

As of late, approaches by coordinate comparison of highquality chromosome-level genome congregations and/ or mapping long peruses produced utilizing PacBio or Nanopore sequencing innovations to reference genomes have demonstrated to be profoundly precise for SV location in expansive and complex plant genomes. In this think about, we produced high-quality chromosome-scale genome gatherings for both cauliflower and cabbage utilizing PacBio long peruses and the high-throughput chromosome compliance capture (Hi-C) innovation. Through coordinate genome comparison combined with long perused mapping, we recognized up to of 119,156 high-confidence SVs between these two genomes [2].

B. oleracea may be a part of the family Brassicaceae (~n338 genera and 3,709 species)7 and one of three diploid Brassica species within the classical triangle of U8 that moreover incorporates diploids B. rapa (AA) and B. nigra (BB) and allotetraploids B. juncea (AABB), B. napus (AACC) and B. carinata (BBCC). These allotetraploid species are imperative oilseed crops, bookkeeping for 12% of world eatable oil production. As the beginning and relationship between these species is obvious, the timing and nature of the developmental occasions related with Brassica dissimilarity and speciation can be uncovered by interspecific genome comparison [3].

The extent and type of genetic variation present in the germplasm of a crop is an important component of efficient breeding programs, because it provides useful information for the broadening of breeding pools, the utilization of heterosis and the selection of parental lines. Also, this information helps breeders to narrow the search for new alleles at loci of interest and assists in the identification of markers linked to desirable traits for introgression into new varieties [1]. An assessment of genetic diversity is also essential for the organization, conservation and use of genetic resources to develop strategies for optimal germplasm collection, evaluation and seed regeneration [4].

Ex situ moderated plant hereditary assets (PGR) are plant genotypes that are put away in central capacity offices. PGR are utilized to move forward cutting edge cultivars by the introgression of modern and outlandish hereditary variety into breeding pools [3]. Be that as it may, PGR regularly involvement a misfortune of hereditary differing qualities, more grounded inbreeding sadness (particularly in outcrossing crops) and amassing of pernicious alleles since of little populace sizes of person gene bank promotions [5].


Our ponder sketched out the convenience of GBS to characterize the hereditary differences of gene bank promotions of a minor edit like cauliflower. A key result was the solid separation of hereditary differing qualities between the two genebanks which most likely reflects the diverse collection histories of the two gene banks. Due to a need of detail within the visa data, components impacting hereditary differences like examining technique, recovery strategies and choice amid recovery may not be well remade, in spite of the fact that the sort of increases included (landraces vs. cultivars) likely features a solid impact.


  1. Karman BN, Tischkau SA. Circadian clock gene expression in the ovary: effects of luteinizing hormone. Bio Reprod. 2006;75(4):624-32.
  2. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  3. Grosdemouge I, Bachelot A, Lucas A, et al. Effects of deletion of the prolactin receptor on ovarian gene expression. Rep Bio and Endocrino. 2003;1(1):1-6.
  4. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  5. Sakurai T, Tamura K, Okamoto S, et al. Possible role of cyclooxygenase II in the acquisition of ovarian luteal function in rodents. Bio Rep. 2003;69(3):835-42.
  6. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  7. Peng XR, Hsueh AJ, Lapolt PS, et al. Localization of luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in ovarian cell types during follicle development and ovulation. Endocrino. 1991;129(6):3200-7.
  8. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  9. Ji Q, Liu PI, Chen PK, et al . Follicle stimulating hormone-induced growth promotion and gene expression profiles on ovarian surface epithelial cells. J Internat Cancer. 2004;112(5):803-14.
  10. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

Get the App