Editorial - Research and Reports on Genetics (2025) Volume 7, Issue 3
How Genes Influence Behavior: Nature, Nurture, and Neuroscience
Rachel Boothe *
Department of Pathology, University of Florida, USA
- *Corresponding Author:
- Rachel Boothe
Department of Pathology, University of Florida, USA
E-mail: rachel.boothe@ufl.edu
Received: 1-May-2025, Manuscript No. aarrgs-25-165427; Editor assigned: 5-May-2025, PreQC No. aarrgs-25-165427 (PQ) Reviewed:17-May-2025, QC No. aarrgs-25-165427Revised:24-May-2025, Manuscript No. aarrgs-25-165427; Published:31-May-2025, DOI: 10.35841/aarrgs-7.3.261
Citation: Boothe R. How genes influence behavior: Nature, nurture, and neuroscience. J Res Rep Genet. 2025;7(3):261
Introduction
Understanding human behavior has long been a complex challenge, drawing the attention of scientists, philosophers, and psychologists alike. One of the most pivotal questions in this realm is the extent to which our behaviors are shaped by genetics versus our environment—a debate famously framed as “nature versus nurture.” With the advent of modern genetic research and neuroscience, we now understand that this is not an either-or question, but rather one of intricate interaction [1].
Genes provide the biological blueprint for our development, influencing everything from eye color to risk tolerance. In the context of behavior, certain genes have been linked to traits like aggression, anxiety, impulsivity, and even social bonding. For instance, variations in the MAOA gene—sometimes called the “warrior gene”—have been associated with increased aggression in some individuals, particularly in conjunction with a history of childhood trauma [2].
However, genes don’t act in isolation. The environment plays a critical role in shaping how genes are expressed, a concept known as epigenetics. Environmental factors such as parenting style, socioeconomic status, and education can activate or suppress certain genes, thus influencing behavior. For example, a child genetically predisposed to anxiety might not develop symptoms if raised in a nurturing, stable environment [3].
Neuroscience has added yet another layer of understanding. Brain imaging studies have shown that genetic factors can influence the structure and function of specific brain regions. For example, the amygdala, a brain region involved in emotion processing, may be more reactive in individuals with certain genetic variants related to mood disorders. These differences can manifest as variations in how people respond to stress or process social cues [4].
Twin and adoption studies have been instrumental in teasing apart genetic and environmental influences. Identical twins raised apart often show striking similarities in personality and behavior, underscoring the power of genetics. Yet, differences between them—shaped by distinct life experiences—highlight the indispensable role of environment [5].
One landmark area of research involves the heritability of complex traits like intelligence, addiction, and mental illness. Heritability estimates attempt to measure how much of the variation in a trait within a population can be attributed to genetic differences. For traits like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, heritability can be as high as 80%, though environmental factors still contribute significantly [6].
Recent developments in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have allowed researchers to identify numerous genes associated with behavior-related traits. However, each individual gene typically contributes a small effect, and the interactions among them are complex. This polygenic nature means that no single “gene for intelligence” or “gene for aggression” exists—rather, behaviors emerge from networks of genes interacting with experiences [7].
Culture and learning also influence gene-behavior relationships. For example, a gene that predisposes someone to risk-taking might lead to very different outcomes in a war-torn country compared to a peaceful one. Thus, the socio-cultural environment acts as a context that shapes how genetic tendencies are realized [8].
Importantly, the knowledge of genetic influences on behavior raises ethical considerations. While understanding genetic predispositions can lead to earlier interventions and better treatments, it also poses risks of discrimination and genetic determinism—the false belief that genes rigidly determine behavior [9].
In education, healthcare, and even the criminal justice system, it's vital to balance genetic insights with a nuanced understanding of environmental impact. Labeling individuals based on genetic potential without considering their life context can lead to stigma and lost opportunities [10].
Conclusion
Ultimately, behavior arises from a dynamic interplay between genes, brain function, and life experience. The field of behavioral genetics continues to evolve, guided by advances in molecular biology, psychology, and neuroscience. Each new discovery brings us closer to understanding what makes us who we are—and how we might support healthier, more adaptive behaviors in future generations.
References
- Plomin R, Asbury K. Nature and nurture: Genetic and environmental influences on behavior. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 2005;600(1):86-98.
- Powledge TM. Behavioral epigenetics: How nurture shapes nature. Biosci. 2011;61(8):588-92.
- Sasaki JY, Kim HS. Nature, nurture, and their interplay: A review of cultural neuroscience. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2017;48(1):4-22.
- Robinson GE. Beyond nature and nurture. Sci. 2004;304(5669):397-9.
- Crews D, Gillette R, Miller-Crews I, et al. Nature, nurture and epigenetics. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;398(1-2):42-52.
- Plomin R, Bergeman CS. The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on “environmental” measures. Behav Brain Sci. 1991;14(3):373-86.
- Pally R. Developments in neuroscience. I: How brain development is shaped by genetic and environmental factors. Int J Psychoanal. 1997;78(3):587.
- Eisler R, Levine DS. Nurture, nature, and caring: We are not prisoners of our genes. Brain Mind. 2002;3:9-52.
- Johnston TD, Edwards L. Genes, interactions, and the development of behavior. Psychol Rev. 2002;109(1):26.
- Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: Joining forces with neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(7):583-90.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref