Addiction & Criminology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Mini Review - Addiction & Criminology (2023) Volume 6, Issue 4

Examining the effectiveness of restorative justice programs.

Laurel Willie*

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Laurel Willie
Department of Mental Health
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Baltimore, USA

Received: 01-August-2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-108663; Editor assigned: 02-August-2023, PreQC No. AARA-23-108663 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-August-2023, QC No. AARA-23- 108663; Revised: 21-August-2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-108663 (R); Published: 28-August-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aara-6.4.156

Citation: Willie L. Examining the effectiveness of restorative justice programs. Addict Criminol. 2023;6(4):156

Visit for more related articles at Addiction & Criminology


The traditional punitive approach to criminal justice, focused on punishment and isolation, has faced criticism for its limited effectiveness in reducing recidivism and healing the harm caused by crimes. In response to these shortcomings, restorative justice programs have gained traction as an alternative approach that aims to address the needs of victims, promote offender accountability, and facilitate community healing. This article explores the effectiveness of restorative justice programs in achieving these goals and their potential to transform the criminal justice system. Restorative justice is a philosophy and framework that emphasizes repairing the harm caused by crimes rather than solely punishing offenders. It involves bringing together victims, offenders, and community members to engage in a facilitated dialogue and collaborative decision-making process. The key principles of restorative justice include inclusivity, dialogue, accountability, and the promotion of healing and reconciliation [1].

One of the primary goals of restorative justice programs is to empower and support victims in their healing journey. By providing them with the opportunity to express their emotions, share their experiences, and ask questions directly to the offender, victims often experience a sense of closure and validation. Research has shown that victims who participate in restorative justice processes report higher levels of satisfaction and a greater sense of justice compared to those involved in traditional criminal justice proceedings. Restorative justice programs also aim to hold offenders accountable for their actions and facilitate their rehabilitation. Through face-toface meetings with victims, offenders are confronted with the consequences of their behavior, allowing them to develop empathy and take responsibility for their actions [2].

This personal accountability can be transformative, leading to increased self-reflection, remorse, and a commitment to making amends. Restorative justice programs often incorporate support services and interventions aimed at addressing underlying issues, such as substance abuse or mental health problems, contributing to the offender's rehabilitation and reducing recidivism rates. Restorative justice recognizes the importance of involving the community in the justice process. Community members can play a supportive role in facilitating dialogue, providing resources, and assisting with the reintegration of offenders into society [3].

Numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of restorative justice programs in various contexts. Metaanalyses and systematic reviews consistently indicate positive outcomes in terms of victim satisfaction, reduced post-traumatic stress symptoms, and increased perceptions of procedural justice. Restorative justice programs have also shown promising results in reducing recidivism rates when compared to traditional punitive approaches. For example, a study conducted by Sherman and Strang (2007) found that offenders who participated in restorative justice conferences had significantly lower reconviction rates compared to those involved in the traditional criminal justice process [4].

While restorative justice programs have demonstrated positive outcomes, challenges remain. Adequate funding, trained facilitators, and community support are essential for the successful implementation of these programs. Ensuring the safety and comfort of participants, particularly victims, is crucial, as well as addressing power imbalances and ensuring the voluntary participation of all parties involved. Ongoing evaluation and research are necessary to refine program models, identify best practices, and address potential limitations [5].


Restorative justice programs offer a transformative approach to the criminal justice system, prioritizing healing, accountability, and community engagement. By focusing on repairing harm, empowering victims, rehabilitating offenders, and involving the community, these programs hold the potential to reduce recidivism rates, improve victim satisfaction, and promote a more inclusive and responsive justice system. While challenges exist, continued support, research, and collaboration can help overcome these hurdles and enable the expansion of restorative justice practices, ultimately leading to a more just and compassionate society.


  1. Braithwaite J. Setting standards for restorative justice. Brit J Criminol. 2002;42(3):563-77.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Paul GD, Borton IM. Exploring communities of facilitators: Orientations toward restorative justice. Confl Resolut Q. 2013 Dec;31(2):189-218.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Shapland J, Atkinson A, Atkinson H, et al. Situating restorative justice within criminal justice. Theor Criminol. 2006;10(4):505-32.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Laxminarayan M. The effect of retributive and restorative sentencing on psychological effects of criminal proceedings. J Interpers Violence. 2013;28(5):938-55.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Button M, McNaughton Nicholls C, Kerr J, et al. Online Fraud Victims in England and Wales: Victims' Views on Sentencing and the Opportunity for Restorative Justice?. Howard J Crime Justice. 2015;54(2):193-211.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App