Journal of Fisheries Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 151 808 1136

Opinion Article - Journal of Fisheries Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Evaluating the Socioeconomic Effects of Overfishing in Coastal Communities

Charlotte Davies*

Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Nexus University, London, UK.

*Corresponding Author:
Charlotte Davies
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology
Nexus University, London, UK.
E-mail: charlotte.davies@cellularstudies.ac.uk

Received: 03-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-164733; Editor assigned: 04-Apr-2025, PreQC No. AAJFR-25-164733(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Apr-2025, QC No AAJFR-25-164733; Revised: 21-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-164733(R); Published: 28-Apr-2025, DOI:10.35841/ aajfr -9.2.261

Citation: Davies C. Evaluating the socioeconomic effects of overfishing in coastal communities. J Fish Res. 2025;9(2):261.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Fisheries Research

Introduction

Overfishing has emerged as one of the most critical challenges facing coastal communities around the world. As fishing efforts have intensified, often beyond the regenerative capacity of marine ecosystems, many fish stocks have plummeted, leaving behind not only ecological damage but also significant socioeconomic consequences. These effects ripple through coastal communities, affecting livelihoods, food security, cultural heritage, and social stability. In many cases, the communities most dependent on fisheries are also those least equipped to adapt to sudden declines in marine resources [1, 2].

The socioeconomic dynamics of overfishing are complex and multifaceted. They encompass not only the immediate economic losses experienced by fishers and traders but also long-term impacts on community development, public health, education, and intergenerational well-being. For many small-scale fishers, fishing is more than just a livelihood—it is a way of life, deeply woven into the social and cultural fabric of their communities. When fish stocks decline, entire systems of knowledge, tradition, and social cohesion come under threat [3, 4].

The causes of overfishing are varied, ranging from inadequate regulation and enforcement to the expansion of industrial fishing fleets and the growing demand for seafood in global markets. Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing further exacerbates the problem, particularly in regions where governance is weak and resources are limited. In this context, coastal communities often find themselves caught in a vicious cycle—struggling to meet immediate needs while engaging in fishing practices that undermine long-term sustainability [5, 6].

One of the most immediate and visible effects of overfishing is the decline in household incomes. As catch volumes drop and target species become harder to find, fishers are forced to travel farther, spend more time at sea, and invest in more equipment—all of which increase operational costs without necessarily improving yields. For small-scale and artisanal fishers, who typically operate on thin profit margins, this can quickly lead to financial instability and debt. Women, who often play key roles in processing and selling fish, are also affected, as reduced supply constrains their income and economic independence [7, 8].

The economic decline triggered by overfishing often spills over into other sectors. With less income flowing through fishing communities, local businesses—from equipment suppliers to food vendors—suffer losses. Education can be disrupted as families pull children out of school to help with fishing or other income-generating activities. Public health may deteriorate as households struggle to afford nutritious food or access healthcare. In communities where fish is a primary source of protein, overfishing can also contribute to malnutrition and diet-related illnesses.

Social structures and community relationships are not immune to the effects of overfishing. As competition for dwindling resources intensifies, tensions can rise between fishers, sometimes escalating into conflicts. Inequities may deepen, particularly where wealthier or more powerful actors are able to secure access to the remaining resources while smaller players are pushed out. In some cases, out-migration becomes a coping strategy, leading to the erosion of traditional knowledge and the breakdown of family networks [9].

Environmental degradation further compounds these challenges. Overfishing disrupts marine food webs and reduces the resilience of ecosystems to other stressors such as pollution and climate change. As habitats like coral reefs and mangroves are damaged, the ecological foundation that supports fisheries—and, by extension, coastal livelihoods—continues to erode. This creates a feedback loop in which ecological decline and socioeconomic vulnerability reinforce each other.

Efforts to address overfishing and its impacts on coastal communities must be both holistic and inclusive. Effective governance is key, including the development of fisheries management plans that are science-based, participatory, and equitable. Policies must recognize the rights of small-scale fishers and support their access to resources, markets, and decision-making processes. Education, alternative livelihoods, and social protection systems can also play crucial roles in building resilience and enabling communities to transition toward sustainability [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the socioeconomic effects of overfishing in coastal communities are profound and far-reaching. They extend beyond individual fishers to affect entire social systems, undermining economic stability, food security, health, and cultural integrity. Addressing these impacts requires more than just ecological solutions—it demands a concerted effort to create just, inclusive, and resilient coastal societies. The path forward lies in recognizing the interconnectedness of people and nature and investing in the long-term well-being of both.

References

  1. Karamanos NK, Theocharis AD, Piperigkou Z, et al. A guide to the composition and functions of the extracellular matrix. The FEBS journal. 2021;288(24):6850-912.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Gubas A, Dikic I. A guide to the regulation of selective autophagy receptors. The FEBS journal. 2022;289(1):75-89.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Weiskirchen S, Schröder SK, Buhl EM, et al. A beginner’s guide to cell culture: Practical advice for preventing needless problems. Cells. 2023;12(5):682.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Gjorevski N, Ranga A, Lutolf MP. Bioengineering approaches to guide stem cell-based organogenesis. Dev. 2014;141(9):1794-804.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Duan X, Krishnaswamy A, De la Huerta I, et al. Type II cadherins guide assembly of a direction-selective retinal circuit. Cell. 2014;158(4):793-807.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Bollyky PL, Wu RP, Falk BA, et al. ECM components guide IL-10 producing regulatory T-cell (TR1) induction from effector memory T-cell precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(19):7938-43.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Na D. User guides for biologists to learn computational methods. J  Microbiol. 2020;58(3):173-5.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Damm EW, Clements WK. Pdgf signalling guides neural crest contribution to the haematopoietic stem cell specification niche. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(5):457-67.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Polacheck WJ, Chen CS. Measuring cell-generated forces: a guide to the available tools. Nat Methods. 2016;13(5):415-23.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Mitchel JA, Hoffman-Kim D. Cellular scale anisotropic topography guides Schwann cell motility. PloS one. 2011;6(9):e24316.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App