Short Communication - Journal of Advanced Surgical Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2
Eras: Enhancing recovery, improving surgical outcomes
Chen Wei*
Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Corresponding Author:
- Chen Wei
Department of General Surgery
Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai, China.
E-mail: chen.wei@shanghaimed.cn
Received : 04-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. aaasr-208; Editor assigned : 08-Apr-2025, PreQC No. aaasr-208(PQ); Reviewed : 28-Apr-2025, QC No aaasr-208; Revised : 07-May-2025, Manuscript No. aaasr-208(R); Published : 16-May-2025 , DOI : 10.35841/2591-7765-9.2.208
Citation: Wei C. Eras: Enhancing recovery, improving surgical outcomes. aaasr. 2025;09(02):208.
Introduction
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways in colorectal surgery have seen updated guidelines, summarizing the latest evidence available. These guidelines place a strong emphasis on several critical components: comprehensive patient education, optimized nutritional strategies, judicious management of fluids, and early patient mobilization. Implementing these pathways aims to significantly improve patient outcomes and effectively reduce postoperative complications, offering a modern standard of care [1].
In bariatric surgery, a systematic review has thoroughly explored the efficacy of ERAS protocols. This research highlights their considerable potential to significantly decrease the length of hospital stays, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and substantially enhance overall patient recovery. These benefits are primarily achieved through the strategic implementation of multimodal interventions tailored to bariatric patients [2].
For cardiac surgery, specific guidelines offer comprehensive recommendations for successfully implementing ERAS protocols. The core focus of these recommendations is on optimizing patient preparation prior to surgery, refining intraoperative management techniques, and providing meticulous postoperative care. The ultimate goals here are to improve patient outcomes dramatically and to minimize the utilization of hospital resources efficiently [3].
The feasibility and tangible benefits of applying ERAS principles have also been assessed in the context of emergency abdominal surgery. This review suggests that even with the unique and inherent challenges presented by acute settings, ERAS protocols can be successfully adapted. These adaptations serve to notably improve patient recovery trajectories and effectively reduce complications, proving their versatility in urgent scenarios [4].
A comprehensive review provides an up-to-date overview of ERAS protocols as they apply across a variety of major surgical procedures. This invaluable resource details the current evidence supporting these protocols, outlines their core elements, and presents effective implementation strategies. The overarching objective of these strategies is consistently to improve patient outcomes and enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery [5].
An important update offers a review of ERAS principles specifically designed for application within gynecologic oncology. This update meticulously outlines the key components pertinent to this specialty and effectively demonstrates how these tailored pathways significantly contribute to reduced complications, markedly shorter hospital stays, and ultimately, an improved quality of life for cancer patients [6].
The application of ERAS protocols in hip and knee arthroplasty has been detailed, showcasing a highly effective multimodal approach. This strategy spans critical phases, including thorough preoperative preparation, precise intraoperative analgesia, and crucial early postoperative mobilization. This integrated approach demonstrably leads to significantly improved functional recovery and a substantial reduction in the length of hospital stay for patients [7].
Insights into the successful implementation and undeniable benefits of ERAS in thoracic surgery are provided in a focused review. This document highlights ERAS's pivotal role in alleviating postoperative pain, considerably shortening hospital stays, and accelerating the overall recovery process for patients undergoing various complex lung and esophageal procedures, marking a significant improvement in patient care [8].
A systematic review specifically examines the profound impact of ERAS protocols on outcomes in urological oncology. It clearly demonstrates their effectiveness in considerably reducing complications, significantly accelerating functional recovery, and notably shortening hospitalization periods for patients undergoing major procedures such as radical prostatectomy, cystectomy, or nephrectomy [9].
Finally, a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the robust evidence supporting ERAS pathways in head and neck oncology. The conclusive findings indicate that these protocols are both safe and highly effective in reducing the length of hospital stay and markedly improving several postoperative outcomes, all without leading to any increase in readmission rates, ensuring patient safety and swift recovery [10].
Conclusion
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a significant advancement in perioperative patient care, demonstrating efficacy across a wide range of surgical disciplines. These multimodal pathways, thoroughly reviewed in various studies, focus on optimizing patient preparation, refining intraoperative management, and enhancing postoperative recovery. For instance, guidelines in colorectal surgery emphasize patient education, nutrition, fluid management, and early mobilization to improve outcomes and reduce complications. Similar benefits are observed in bariatric surgery, where ERAS decreases hospital stay and reduces complications. Cardiac surgery protocols aim to optimize care and minimize resource use, while emergency abdominal surgery has seen adapted ERAS principles improve recovery. Comprehensive reviews confirm ERAS effectiveness for major surgical procedures, providing evidence on core elements and implementation strategies. In specialized fields like gynecologic oncology, urological oncology, and head and neck oncology, ERAS contributes to reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, and improved quality of life. Furthermore, applications in hip and knee arthroplasty and thoracic surgery consistently show improved functional recovery and reduced hospital stays by integrating multimodal approaches. This body of evidence collectively underscores the universal value of ERAS in enhancing patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
References
- Ulrica OG, Michael JS, Martin H. Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colorectal Surgery: 2023. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(10):1037-1046.
- Ma?gorzata M, Pawe? M, Mariusz M. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Bariatric Surgery-A Systematic Review. Obes Surg. 2022;32(12):3974-3983.
- Daniel TE, Marco A, Mark GB. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(1):77-86.
- Christian S, Olle L, Cornelis HD. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2020;44(6):1708-1718.
- Alexander JC, Anne EB, Adam C. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Patients Undergoing Major Surgical Procedures: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Anesth. 2024;92:111303.
- Olle L, Michael S, Martin H. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecologic Oncology: Update and Review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33(7):1063-1070.
- Henrik H, Olle L, Roger N. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol for hip and knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(11):1227-1234.
- Xinyan F, Zhongliang Z, Jianwei X. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Thoracic Surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2022;14(10):3705-3712.
- Gary SC, Jane AH, Katharine D. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Urological Oncology: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(5):981-990.
- Meghan RM, Mohamed A, Zaid A. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Head and Neck Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oral Oncol. 2023;138:106240.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref