Journal of Plant Biotechnology and Microbiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Editorial - Journal of Plant Biotechnology and Microbiology (2025) Volume 8, Issue 1

Decoding Plant Genomes: The Role of Molecular Markers in Breeding Efficiency

Zhangjiang Kang *

Department of Plant Pathology, Guizhou University, China

Corresponding Author:
Zhangjiang Kang
Department of Plant Pathology,
Guizhou University,
China;
E-mail: zkang@gzu.edu.cn

Received: 02-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAPBM-25-169155; Editor assigned: 03-Feb-2025, AAPBM-25-169155 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Feb-2025, QC No. AAPBM-25-169155; Revised: 21-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAPBM-25-169155 (R); Published: 28-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.35841/aapbm.8.1.176

Citation: Miyamoto C. Sowing the seeds of innovation: Transgenic plants and agricultural biotechnology. J Plant Bio Technol. 2025;8(1):176.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Plant Biotechnology and Microbiology

Introduction

In the quest to feed a growing global population and combat the challenges of climate change, plant breeders are turning to molecular tools to accelerate crop improvement. Among these tools, molecular markers have emerged as powerful instruments for decoding plant genomes and enhancing breeding efficiency. By enabling precise selection of desirable traits, molecular markers are transforming traditional breeding into a data-driven, targeted process that delivers superior crop varieties faster and more reliably [1, 2].

Molecular markers are identifiable DNA sequences located at specific positions within the genome. These sequences are associated with particular traits or genetic variations and can be used to track the inheritance of genes across generations. Unlike morphological markers, molecular markers are not influenced by environmental conditions, making them highly reliable for genetic analysis [3, 4].

Each type varies in complexity, cost, and resolution, but all serve the fundamental purpose of identifying genetic differences. One of the most impactful applications of molecular markers is Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS). MAS allows breeders to select plants carrying desirable genes without waiting for the trait to be expressed phenotypically [5, 6].

For example, MAS has been used to develop rice varieties resistant to bacterial blight by selecting for the Xa21 resistance gene using linked markers. Many agronomic traits such as yield, drought tolerance, and nutrient use efficiency are quantitative traits controlled by multiple genes. Molecular markers enable QTL mapping, which identifies genomic regions associated with these traits [7, 8].

While MAS focuses on specific markers linked to known genes, Genomic Selection (GS) uses genome-wide marker data to predict the breeding value of individuals. GS employs statistical models trained on large datasets to estimate genetic merit without phenotyping every generation. As these innovations mature, molecular markers will continue to drive breakthroughs in crop improvement [9, 10].

Conclusion

Molecular markers have revolutionized plant breeding by providing precise, efficient, and scalable tools for genetic analysis and selection. From MAS to GS, these markers enable breeders to decode plant genomes and accelerate the development of superior crop varieties. In a world facing food security and climate challenges, molecular markers are not just tools they are catalysts for agricultural transformation.

References

  1. Zhang Y, Massel K, Godwin ID, et al. Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement. Genome Biol. 2018;19:1-1.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, et al. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(3):230-2.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Hua K, Tao X, Yuan F, et al. Precise A· T to G· C base editing in the rice genome. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;11(4):627-30.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Upadhyay SK, Kumar J, Alok A, et al. RNA-guided genome editing for target gene mutations in wheat. G3: Genes Genomes Genet. 2013;3(12):2233-8.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Tester M, Langridge P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Sci. 2010;327(5967):818-22.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App