Anesthesiology and Clinical Science Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Short Communication - Anesthesiology and Clinical Science Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Contemporary sedation: Practices, guidelines, monitoring, outcomes

Laura Brown*

Department of Clinical Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Laura Brown
Department of Clinical Anesthesia
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
E-mail: laura.brown@utoronto.ca

Received : 02-Jun-2025, Manuscript No. aaacsr-215; Editor assigned : 04-Jun-2025, PreQC No. aaacsr-215(PQ); Reviewed : 24-Jun-2025, QC No aaacsr-215; Revised : 03-Jul-2025, Manuscript No. aaacsr-215(R); Published : 14-Jul-2025 , DOI : 10.35841-92215

Citation: Brown L. Contemporary sedation: Practices, guidelines, monitoring, outcomes. aaajmr. 2025;09(02):215.

Visit for more related articles at Anesthesiology and Clinical Science Research

Introduction

The landscape of medical sedation practices is continually evolving, driven by advancements in patient safety, pharmacological understanding, and a nuanced appreciation for patient-centered care. Recent publications provide crucial insights across various clinical domains, from intensive care to emergency medicine and palliative care. This body of work underscores the multifaceted nature of sedation, encompassing guidelines, consensus statements, systematic reviews, and narrative discussions that collectively aim to optimize patient outcomes. A pivotal update in the field comes with the latest recommendations for managing pain, agitation, and delirium in adult Intensive Care Unit patients. This guideline strongly advocates for a patient-centered approach, emphasizing regular assessment, prioritizing non-pharmacologic interventions, and strategically minimizing deep sedation to facilitate early mobility and significantly improve long-term outcomes for critically ill individuals [1].

Parallel to this, standardized practices for procedural sedation and analgesia in the Emergency Department have been a focus. A consensus statement offers clear, updated guidance for safe and effective administration, addressing critical aspects such as careful patient selection, thorough pre-procedure evaluation, vigilant monitoring during sedation, and comprehensive post-procedure care. The goal here is to enhance patient safety and consistency across practices [2].

Recognizing the unique needs of younger patients, specific research has delved into pediatric procedural sedation in the Emergency Department. A systematic review and meta-analysis consolidates current evidence, synthesizing findings on the efficacy and safety of various sedative agents. This provides invaluable insights into best practices for this vulnerable patient population, while also highlighting areas where further research is essential to fill existing knowledge gaps [3].

Beyond procedural sedation, the monitoring of anesthesia depth during general surgery is another critical area. A narrative review meticulously explores the current landscape of depth of sedation monitoring. It discusses the diverse monitoring technologies available, elaborates on their underlying principles, and evaluates their clinical utility in preventing both intraoperative awareness and the risks associated with excessively deep anesthesia, all ultimately aiming for improved patient safety and outcomes [4].

For older adults, the interplay between sedation practices and the incidence of postoperative delirium in surgical patients demands specific attention. One review meticulously investigates this complex relationship, highlighting particular anesthetic techniques and pharmacological choices that can either contribute to or effectively mitigate the risk of delirium. This work underscores the paramount importance of individualized care tailored to the specific vulnerabilities of elderly populations [5].

The administration of specific sedative agents by non-anesthesiologist providers also warrants close scrutiny for safety. A systematic review and meta-analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of propofol sedation when administered by these practitioners. It scrutinizes outcomes across diverse clinical settings, offering crucial data on adverse event rates and identifying factors that significantly influence safety. This information is vital for the development of appropriate training and credentialing standards for non-anesthesiologist providers [6].

Turning to specific pharmacological agents, the use of dexmedetomidine for sedation in critically ill adults has been a topic of considerable interest. A narrative review thoroughly examines this alpha-2 agonist, outlining its unique pharmacological properties, observed clinical benefits, and potential side effects. It provides a crucial comparison of its profile to traditional sedatives and discusses its increasingly recognized role in promoting cooperative sedation and reducing delirium incidence in the ICU setting [7].

Furthermore, addressing the broader challenge of opioid use, various opioid-sparing sedation strategies employed in the Intensive Care Unit have been systematically reviewed. This review investigates the efficacy of non-opioid sedatives and multimodal approaches in effectively reducing overall opioid consumption. The primary objective is to mitigate opioid-related adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and prolonged mechanical ventilation, while consistently maintaining adequate patient comfort [8].

Continuous monitoring is a recurring theme for patient safety during sedation procedures. A dedicated review addresses the critical importance of continuous monitoring for respiratory depression. It thoroughly discusses various monitoring modalities, including capnography and pulse oximetry, evaluating their respective strengths and limitations in the early detection of respiratory compromise to significantly enhance patient safety both during and immediately after sedation procedures [9].

Finally, the sensitive area of palliative care sedation is also addressed. An update on palliative sedation delves deeply into current practices and the profound ethical considerations that surround its use for patients experiencing intractable suffering at the end of life. It offers essential insights into indications for its use, common pharmacological agents employed, and underscores the critical importance of clear communication and shared decision-making with both patients and their families during these sensitive times [10].

This collection of literature collectively reflects a concerted effort within the medical community to refine and improve sedation practices, ensuring better safety, efficacy, and patient-centered care across the spectrum of clinical needs.

Conclusion

This compilation presents a comprehensive view of contemporary sedation practices, spanning a wide array of clinical contexts and patient populations. Updated guidelines emphasize a patient-centered approach for adults in the Intensive Care Unit, focusing on non-pharmacologic interventions and minimizing deep sedation to improve long-term outcomes for critically ill individuals. The Emergency Department sees refined protocols for safe procedural sedation and analgesia in adults, covering patient selection, evaluation, monitoring, and post-procedure care. Specific attention is given to pediatric procedural sedation in the Emergency Department, with a systematic review synthesizing evidence on efficacy and safety of sedative agents for this vulnerable group. Monitoring advancements are a significant focus, with a narrative review exploring technologies for depth of sedation during general anesthesia to prevent both awareness and excessive depth. For older adults undergoing surgery, a review investigates the interplay between sedation and postoperative delirium, identifying anesthetic choices that influence risk. The safety of propofol sedation by non-anesthesiologist providers is comprehensively assessed, providing data on adverse event rates and factors affecting safety. Dexmedetomidine's role in critically ill adults is also reviewed, highlighting its properties, benefits, and role in cooperative sedation and delirium reduction in the ICU. Furthermore, opioid-sparing sedation strategies in the ICU are examined for their efficacy in reducing opioid consumption and associated adverse effects. Continuous monitoring for respiratory depression during sedation is underscored as critical for patient safety, discussing modalities like capnography. Lastly, current practices and ethical considerations surrounding palliative sedation for intractable suffering at the end of life are updated.

References

  1. Judith B, Dale MN, Kristin LCS. Guideline for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adults in the ICU: 2024 Update. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(2):e28-e151.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  2. Keith PM, Paul SA, Richard DB. Consensus Statement for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;82(6):e49-e70.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. M. FB, Mickael DSP, Caitlin KR. Pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(2):144-162.e5.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  4. George AM, Anthony GH, Michael TA. Depth of Sedation Monitoring During General Anesthesia: A Narrative Review. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(1):203-221.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Frederick ES, Sharon KI, Sharon KL. Sedation and Delirium in Older Adults Undergoing Surgery: A Review. Anesthesiol Clin. 2021;39(2):339-350.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  6. Vered C, Gadi S, Elad G. Safety of Propofol Sedation Administered by Non-Anesthesiologist Providers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2023;91:111075.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Laura P, Tommaso S, Giuseppe BC. Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Critically Ill Adults: A Narrative Review. J Clin Anesth. 2020;60:109605.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  8. Anna M, Edoardo BG, Maurizio SP. Opioid-Sparing Sedation Strategies in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2022;35(4):488-496.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Frank JO, Douglas EM, Ashish KK. Monitoring for Respiratory Depression During Sedation: A Review. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(1):200-210.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  10. Paul C, Lieve MV, Marc VVdB. Palliative Sedation: An Update on Current Practices and Ethical Considerations. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2020;14(4):295-300.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Get the App