Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Rapid Communication - Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures (2023) Volume 7, Issue 4

Assessment of the Role of Imaging Modalities in Preoperative Planning for Intestinal Fistula Surgery

Andrei Kiricuta *

Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Cluj, Romania

*Corresponding Author:
Andrei Kiricuta
Department of Pediatric Surgery,
University of Cluj,

Received: 01-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. AACRSIP-23-104888; Editor assigned: 04-Jul-2023, PreQC No. AACRSIP-23-104888(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Jul-2023, QC No. AACRSIP-23-104888; Revised: 21-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. AACRSIP-23-104888; Published: 28-Jul-2023, DOI:10.35841/aacrsip-7.4.154

Citation: Kiricuta A. Assessment of the role of imaging modalities in preoperative planning for intestinal fistula surgery. Case Rep Surg Invasive Proced. 2023;7(4):154

Visit for more related articles at Case Reports in Surgery and Invasive Procedures




Intestinal fistulas are abnormal connections between different segments of the intestines or between the intestines and other structures in the body. These conditions can be challenging to manage, and preoperative planning plays a crucial role in ensuring successful surgical outcomes. In recent years, the role of imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of intestinal fistulas has significantly evolved. Various imaging techniques now provide detailed anatomical information and aid in surgical planning, resulting in improved patient care and outcomes. This article aims to assess the role of imaging modalities in preoperative planning for intestinal fistula surgery [1].

Computed tomography (CT) scan is one of the most commonly used imaging modalities for the evaluation of intestinal fistulas. CT scans provide detailed cross-sectional images of the abdomen and pelvis, allowing for accurate localization and characterization of the fistula tract. CT imaging helps identify the presence and extent of the fistula, assess the surrounding structures, and evaluate complications such as abscesses or inflammatory changes. Multiplanar reconstructions and three-dimensional volume-rendered images can aid in visualizing complex fistula anatomy, assisting the surgeon in planning the optimal surgical approach [2]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is another valuable imaging modality for preoperative planning in intestinal fistula cases. MRI offers excellent soft tissue contrast, making it useful for evaluating the bowel wall, identifying abscesses or inflammatory changes, and assessing the extent of disease involvement. MR enterography, a specialized MRI technique, can provide detailed visualization of the small bowel, allowing for precise identification and characterization of the fistula. Additionally, MRI can assess the vascularity of the affected area, which is crucial for surgical planning, particularly in complex cases involving vascular complications.

Fluoroscopy, combined with contrast studies such as a barium swallow or enema, can be employed to evaluate intestinal fistulas. These studies involve the administration of contrast material, which helps delineate the anatomy and highlight the fistula tract. Fluoroscopic imaging allows dynamic evaluation of the intestines, aiding in the identification of leakage sites and the assessment of functional aspects of the fistula. However, it is important to note that contrast studies have certain limitations, including the risk of extravasation or leakage of contrast material, which may exacerbate the condition. Therefore, these studies are generally reserved for selected cases or when other imaging modalities are inconclusive [3].

The optimal preoperative assessment of intestinal fistulas often requires a multimodal approach. By integrating information from various imaging modalities, surgeons can obtain a comprehensive understanding of the fistula anatomy, extent of disease, associated complications, and vascular involvement. This integrated approach facilitates accurate surgical planning, enables better communication among the surgical team, and contributes to improved patient outcomes [4].

Imaging modalities play a vital role in the preoperative planning of intestinal fistula surgery. Computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fluoroscopy with contrast studies, and ultrasound provide valuable information regarding the anatomy, extent of disease, and associated complications. Each imaging modality has its strengths and limitations, and a multimodal approach is often necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. The integration of imaging findings facilitates informed decision-making, enhances surgical planning, and ultimately improves patient care and outcomes in intestinal fistula cases. As technology continues to advance, imaging modalities will likely play an increasingly prominent role in optimizing preoperative strategies for these complex surgical interventions [5].


  1. Lee JK, Stein SL. Radiographic and endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of enterocutaneous fistulas. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(03):149-60.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Zhuang N, Zhu Q, Li W, et al. Rare intestinal fistula caused by primary lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract: Two case reports and literature review. Med. 2018;97(27).

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Kaushal M, Carlson GL. Management of enterocutaneous fistulas. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17(02):79-88.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Krpata DM, Stein SL, Eston M, et al. Outcomes of simultaneous large complex abdominal wall reconstruction and enterocutaneous fistula takedown. Am J Surg. 2013;205(3):354-9.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Wright H, Kearney S, Zhou K, et al. Topical management of enterocutaneous and enteroatmospheric fistulas: A systematic review. Wound Manag Prev. 2020;66(4):26-37.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App