Journal of Fisheries Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 151 808 1136

Perspective - Journal of Fisheries Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Antibiotic Resistance in Aquaculture: Risks, Trends, and Mitigation Strategies

Emma Rylance*

Division of Cellular Framework Studies, Global Institute of Cellular Studies, India.

*Corresponding Author:
Emma Rylance
Division of Cellular Framework Studies
Global Institute of Cellular Studies, India.
E-mail: emma.@cameworks.edu

Received: 03-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-164737; Editor assigned: 04-Apr-2025, PreQC No. AAJFR-25-164737(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Apr-2025, QC No AAJFR-25-164737; Revised: 21-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-164737(R); Published: 28-Apr-2025, DOI:10.35841/ aajfr -9.2.265

Citation: Rylance E. Antibiotic resistance in aquaculture: risks, trends, and mitigation strategies. J Fish Res. 2025;9(2):265.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Fisheries Research

Introduction

Antibiotic resistance in aquaculture is an increasingly urgent issue that has garnered significant attention from the scientific community, policymakers, and the general public. The use of antibiotics in aquaculture has become widespread as a means of controlling bacterial infections, promoting growth, and preventing diseases in fish farming operations. However, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in these systems have led to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which pose serious risks not only to the health of the fish but also to human health and the broader ecosystem [1].

Aquaculture is one of the fastest-growing food production sectors globally, supplying more than half of the world’s seafood. As the demand for fish products continues to rise, so does the reliance on antibiotics to ensure the health and productivity of farmed fish [2]. The use of antibiotics in aquaculture is intended to prevent and treat infections caused by bacteria, which can spread rapidly in densely stocked farming systems. These infections can lead to significant economic losses, particularly when they result in mass mortality or decreased productivity. However, the extensive and sometimes inappropriate use of antibiotics in aquaculture has created a perfect breeding ground for the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [3].

Antibiotic resistance occurs when bacteria evolve mechanisms to withstand the drugs that would normally kill them or inhibit their growth. This resistance can develop naturally through mutations, but it is often accelerated by the overuse and misuse of antibiotics [4]. In aquaculture, antibiotics are commonly administered to fish either through their feed or water, and the practice is often carried out without proper regulation or oversight. In some cases, antibiotics are used preventively, even when fish are not showing signs of infection, or they are used in subtherapeutic doses that do not fully eradicate bacteria. This practice contributes to the development of resistant strains of bacteria, which can then spread within the farm, to neighboring farms, and even into the wild environment [5].

The consequences of antibiotic resistance in aquaculture are far-reaching. Resistant bacteria can reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics, making it more difficult to treat infections in fish. This not only threatens the health of farmed fish but also the profitability of aquaculture operations [6]. In addition, resistant bacteria can be transferred to humans through the consumption of contaminated seafood, handling of fish, or through the environmental release of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from farms into surrounding ecosystems. This transfer of resistance poses a significant public health threat, as it can lead to infections in humans that are more difficult to treat with conventional antibiotics [7].

The issue of antibiotic resistance in aquaculture is compounded by the fact that the global demand for seafood is expected to continue growing. As wild fish stocks become increasingly depleted due to overfishing, aquaculture is expected to play a crucial role in meeting the world’s seafood needs. However, without addressing the problem of antibiotic resistance, the sustainability of aquaculture and the health of both aquatic and human populations could be compromised. Tackling antibiotic resistance in aquaculture requires a multi-faceted approach that involves improving antibiotic stewardship, developing alternative treatment strategies, and implementing better regulatory frameworks [8].

One of the key challenges in addressing antibiotic resistance in aquaculture is the widespread and often indiscriminate use of antibiotics in the industry. In many parts of the world, particularly in developing countries, antibiotics are readily available and can be purchased without a prescription. This has led to the widespread use of antibiotics in aquaculture, even in cases where they may not be necessary [9]. In some regions, antibiotics are used as a preventive measure to keep fish healthy in high-density farming environments, even when there is no indication of disease. This practice can lead to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, as the bacteria are exposed to sublethal concentrations of antibiotics over prolonged periods, allowing them to evolve resistance.

The use of antibiotics for growth promotion is another major contributor to antibiotic resistance in aquaculture. In some countries, antibiotics are used to promote faster growth in fish, even in the absence of disease. This practice not only contributes to the development of resistance but also raises concerns about the presence of antibiotic residues in seafood products. These residues can be harmful to consumers and may contribute to the development of resistance in human pathogens as well. Although the use of antibiotics for growth promotion is banned in many countries, it continues to be a common practice in some regions, particularly where regulatory oversight is weak [10].

Conclusion

I Public awareness and education also play a crucial role in combating antibiotic resistance in aquaculture. Consumers need to be informed about the potential risks associated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in seafood and the importance of choosing products from responsible sources. Certification schemes, such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) and the GlobalG.A.P. certification, can help guide consumers towards sustainable and responsibly farmed seafood products that are less likely to contribute to the problem of antibiotic resistance.

References

  1. Offodile OF, Mehrez A, Grznar J. Cellular manufacturing: a taxonomic review framework. J Manuf Syst. 1994;13(3):196-220.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. McCracken JM, Xu S, Badea A, et al. Deterministic integration of biological and soft materials onto 3D microscale cellular frameworks. Adv Biosyst. 2017;1(9):1700068.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Canyurt OE, Hajela P. A cellular framework for structural analysis and optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2005;194(30-33):3516-34.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Kaminski J, Rutishauser U. Between persistently active and activity-silent frameworks: novel vistas on the cellular basis of working memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1464(1):64-75.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Nomoto M, Inokuchi K. Behavioral, cellular, and synaptic tagging frameworks. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018;153:13-20.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Couclelis H. Cellular worlds: a framework for modeling micro—macro dynamics. Environment and planning A. 1985;17(5):585-96.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Chen X, Chi M, Xing L, et al. Natural plant template-derived cellular framework porous carbon as a high-rate and long-life electrode material for energy storage. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2019;7(6):5845-55.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Auer G, Giannini V, Gódor I, et al. Cellular energy efficiency evaluation framework. In2011 IEEE 73rd vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) 2011 May 15 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Turin-Moleavin IA, Doroftei F, Coroaba A, et al. Dynamic constitutional frameworks (DCFs) as nanovectors for cellular delivery of DNA. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2015;13(34):9005-11.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Danzeisen M, Braun T, Winiker S, et al. Implementation of a cellular framework for Spontaneous Network Establishment. InIEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005 2005 Mar 13 (Vol. 3, pp. 1683-1689). IEEE.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App