Editorial - Anesthesiology and Clinical Science Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1
Anesthesia and neuroscience: Exploring the impact of anesthetic agents on brain function
Isabella Lee *
Department of Neuroscience and Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada
- *Corresponding Author:
- Isabella Lee
Department of Neuroscience and Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada
E-mail: leeisab@ymail.com
Received: 03-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAACSR-25-162688; Editor assigned: 04-Mar-2025, PreQC No. AAACSR-25-162688; Reviewed:18-Mar-2025, QC No. AAACSR-25-162688; Revised:24-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAACSR-25-162688(R); Published:31-Mar-2025, DOI:10.35841/ aaacsr-9.1.205
Citation: Lee I. Anesthesia and neuroscience: Exploring the impact of anesthetic agents on brain function. Anaesthesiol Clin Sci Res 2025;9(1):205
Introduction
The intersection of anesthesia and neuroscience has become an increasingly important field of study, as researchers continue to explore how anesthetic agents interact with the brain and influence its complex functions. Anesthesia, a crucial component of modern medicine, is designed to induce a controlled state of unconsciousness, immobility, and analgesia to facilitate surgical procedures. While the primary goal of anesthesia is to ensure the safety and comfort of patients, the effects of anesthetic agents on the brain are profound and far-reaching, with implications for both short-term recovery and long-term cognitive outcomes. Recent advancements in neuroscience have enabled a deeper understanding of how anesthetics impact brain activity, providing insights into mechanisms of action, potential risks, and the long-term consequences of anesthesia on brain function. This knowledge has opened up new avenues for optimizing anesthetic techniques, minimizing adverse effects, and improving patient outcomes [1].
Anesthetic agents primarily exert their effects on the brain by interacting with specific neurotransmitter systems and receptors that govern neuronal activity. The most commonly used anesthetic agents—volatile inhaled agents (such as sevoflurane and desflurane) and intravenous agents (such as propofol and ketamine)—act on key neurotransmitter systems, including gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate, and acetylcholine, to induce a state of unconsciousness and inhibit pain perception. GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, plays a central role in the mechanism of action of many anesthetics. Agents like propofol and benzodiazepines enhance GABAergic signaling, promoting neuronal inhibition and leading to sedation and loss of consciousness. Conversely, certain anesthetics, such as ketamine, block the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors, which are involved in excitatory neurotransmission, leading to dissociative anesthesia and analgesia [2, 3].
While the effects of anesthetics on the brain during surgery are generally well-understood and controlled, the long-term effects of anesthesia on brain function are still an area of active investigation. One of the most concerning issues in anesthesia neuroscience is postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), a condition characterized by memory problems, attention deficits, and other cognitive impairments that can persist for days, weeks, or even months after surgery, particularly in older adults. Although the exact mechanisms underlying POCD remain unclear, it is believed that anesthesia-induced alterations in brain connectivity, inflammation, and neuroinflammation may contribute to these cognitive impairments. Studies have shown that older patients are more vulnerable to the effects of anesthesia, potentially due to age-related changes in the brain, such as a decline in synaptic plasticity and increased susceptibility to neuroinflammation. The use of volatile anesthetics has been associated with increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in the brain, which may further exacerbate cognitive decline [4, 5].
In addition to POCD, there is growing concern over anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity, particularly in pediatric populations. Research has shown that exposure to general anesthesia during early brain development can lead to long-term cognitive and behavioral deficits. Animal studies have demonstrated that exposure to anesthetics such as sevoflurane and isoflurane can result in neuronal apoptosis (cell death) and impaired synaptic development, potentially leading to deficits in learning, memory, and behavior. While studies in humans are still ongoing, there is increasing evidence to suggest that early exposure to anesthesia may have lasting effects on brain development. This has raised important questions about the safety of anesthesia in young children and has prompted calls for further investigation into the potential risks of anesthesia in pediatric patients, particularly in the context of non-essential procedures or repeated exposures [6, 7].
On the other hand, anesthetic agents have also been used as tools to study brain function and neuronal networks, offering valuable insights into the workings of the brain. For instance, certain anesthetics such as propofol and sevoflurane are known to induce distinct patterns of brain activity that can be monitored using electroencephalography (EEG). These patterns provide researchers with valuable information about the brain’s functional states during different levels of anesthesia, from light sedation to deep unconsciousness. Additionally, the use of ketamine in subanesthetic doses has gained popularity in recent years as a potential therapeutic approach for treatment-resistant depression, as it has been shown to rapidly induce antidepressant effects by modulating glutamate transmission and promoting synaptogenesis. This has led to the development of ketamine-based therapies that could revolutionize the treatment of mood disorders and other neuropsychiatric conditions [8,9].
Another area of research in anesthesia neuroscience is the relationship between anesthesia and neuroplasticity, or the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections. Some studies suggest that certain anesthetic agents may influence neuroplasticity, either promoting or inhibiting the brain’s ability to adapt to changes. For example, ketamine has been shown to enhance synaptic plasticity, which may contribute to its antidepressant effects, while volatile anesthetics may suppress neuroplasticity, potentially contributing to cognitive dysfunction. Understanding how anesthetics affect neuroplasticity has important implications for both the treatment of neurological disorders and the long-term effects of anesthesia on brain health [10].
Conclusion
The relationship between anesthesia and brain function is a complex and multifaceted area of study with significant implications for both patient care and the broader field of neuroscience. Advances in the understanding of how anesthetic agents interact with the brain have provided valuable insights into their mechanisms of action, as well as their potential risks and benefits. While anesthetics play a critical role in ensuring safe and effective surgical procedures, the long-term effects of anesthesia on cognitive function, particularly in vulnerable populations such as the elderly and young children, remain an important area of ongoing research. As we continue to unravel the intricate relationship between anesthesia and the brain, it is essential to develop safer, more targeted anesthetic techniques that minimize the risk of neurotoxicity and cognitive dysfunction while maximizing the benefits of anesthesia for patients undergoing surgery. The evolving field of anesthesia neuroscience promises to offer new strategies for improving patient outcomes and advancing our understanding of the brain’s response to external interventions .
References
- Marhofer P, Columb M, Hopkins PM, et al. Dexamethasone as an adjuvant for peripheral nerve blockade: a randomised, triple-blinded crossover study in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(4):525-31.
- Baeriswyl M, Kirkham KR, Jacot-Guillarmod A, et al. Efficacy of perineural vs systemic dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after peripheral nerve block: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(2):183-91.
- Schwenk ES, Kasper VP, Smoker JD, et al. Mepivacaine versus Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia for Early Postoperative AmbulationA Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiol. 2020;133(4):801-11.
- Choi S, Mahon P, Awad IT. Neuraxial anesthesia and bladder dysfunction in the perioperative period: A systematic review. Can J Anaesth. 2012:1-23.
- Urmey WF, Stanton J, Peterson M, Sharrock NE. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for outpatient surgery: dose-response characteristics of intrathecal isobaric lidocaine using a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle.. Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1995;83(3):528-34.
- Allen BS, Barth MJ, Ilbawi MN. Pediatric myocardial protection: an overview. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;13(1):56-72.
- Cason BA, Gamperl AK, Slocum RE, et al. Anesthetic-induced preconditioning: previous administration of isoflurane decreases myocardial infarct size in rabbits. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1997;87(5):1182-90.
- Li F, Yuan Y. Meta-analysis of the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane versus propofol during cardiac surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15(1):1-2.
- Liu R, Ishibe Y, Ueda M. Isoflurane–sevoflurane administration before ischemia attenuates ischemia–reperfusion-induced injury in isolated rat lungs. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2000;92(3):833-40.
- Julier K, da Silva R, Garcia C, et al. Preconditioning by sevoflurane decreases biochemical markers for myocardial and renal dysfunction in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2003;98(6):1315-1327.
Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref