Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Editorial - Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1

Advancing Personalized Renal Therapy: The Role of Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression

Larry Cowgi >*

Department of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Larry Cowgi
Department of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Canada
Institute of Nephrology Research
USA
E-mail: larry@cowgil.ca

Received:02-Feb-2024,Manuscript No. AACNT-24-161905; Editor assigned:03-Feb-2024,PreQC No. AACNT-24-161905(PQ); Reviewed:16-Feb-2024,QC No. AACNT-24-161905; Revised:20-Feb-2024,Manuscript No. AACNT-24-161905(R); Published:27-Feb-2024,DOI: 10.35841/aacnt-9.1.242

Citation: Cowgi L. Advancing Personalized Renal Therapy: The Role of Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression. J Clini Nephrol. 2025; 9(1):242

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics

Introduction

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a global health challenge affecting millions of individuals, leading to a progressive loss of kidney function and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality. Traditional treatment approaches focus on general disease management, but recent advancements in personalized medicine have paved the way for tailored interventions. Personalized renal therapy, guided by CKD progression biomarkers, offers a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes by providing targeted and individualized treatment plans [1].

CKD is characterized by a gradual decline in kidney function, often caused by conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and glomerulonephritis. The disease progresses through five stages, with the final stage—end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation. Early detection and intervention are critical in slowing CKD progression, highlighting the need for reliable biomarkers that can predict disease trajectory and response to therapy [2].

Biomarkers play a crucial role in identifying individuals at high risk of CKD progression and guiding treatment decisions. These biological indicators help assess kidney damage, inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis, enabling a more precise and personalized approach to renal therapy. The integration of biomarker-based strategies allows clinicians to tailor treatment plans according to a patient’s specific pathophysiological profile [3].

Several biomarkers have been identified to monitor CKD progression. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remain standard measures, but novel biomarkers such as kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), cystatin C, and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) provide additional insights into renal health. These biomarkers help differentiate between various stages of CKD and predict long-term outcomes more accurately than traditional markers [4].

Advancements in genomics and proteomics have led to the discovery of genetic and molecular biomarkers that influence CKD progression. Genetic variations in genes such as APOL1, UMOD, and EPO have been associated with increased susceptibility to kidney disease. By integrating genetic profiling into clinical practice, healthcare providers can identify high-risk individuals and personalize treatment strategies to mitigate disease progression [5].

Inflammation and metabolic dysregulation contribute significantly to CKD progression. Biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) are linked to chronic inflammation in CKD patients. Additionally, metabolic markers like insulin resistance and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) provide valuable information on the metabolic disturbances associated with kidney dysfunction. Targeting these pathways through personalized interventions can help slow disease advancement [6].

The use of biomarkers in renal therapy extends to pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Biomarker-based risk stratification enables the selection of appropriate medications, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and anti-inflammatory agents. Furthermore, lifestyle modifications, including dietary adjustments and exercise, can be tailored based on biomarker profiles to optimize treatment efficacy [7].

Advancements in diagnostic technologies, including liquid biopsy, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis, and high-throughput omics platforms, have enhanced the accuracy and accessibility of CKD biomarkers. These innovations facilitate early disease detection and real-time monitoring, allowing for timely intervention and personalized therapeutic adjustments [8].

Despite the promising role of biomarkers in personalized renal therapy, challenges remain in translating research findings into routine clinical practice. Standardization of biomarker assays, validation in diverse populations, and integration into healthcare systems require further exploration. Future research should focus on multi-omics approaches, combining genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to develop comprehensive biomarker panels for CKD management [9, 10].

Conclusion

Personalized renal therapy, guided by CKD progression biomarkers, represents a significant advancement in nephrology. By leveraging biomarker-based insights, clinicians can provide more precise and individualized treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes. As research continues to refine biomarker applications, personalized medicine will play an increasingly vital role in preventing and managing CKD, offering hope for better prognosis and quality of life for affected individuals.

References

  1. Sigmund M, Ferstl R. Panel vector autoregression in R with the package panelvar. Q Rev Econ Finance. 2021; 80:693-720.

    2. Indexed at, Google scholar

  2. Cardenas CE, Yang J, Anderson BM, et al. Advances in auto-segmentation. Semin radiat oncol. 2019;29(3):185-197.

    3. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  3. Hohmann E. Editorial commentary: Big data and machine learning in medicine. J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2022;38(3):848-9.

    4. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  4. Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM, Grantham JJ, et al. Renal structure in early autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): The Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP) cohort. Kidney int. 2003;64(3):1035-45.

    5. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  5. Momeny M, Neshat AA, Hussain MA, et al . Learning-to-augment strategy using noisy and denoised data: Improving generalizability of deep CNN for the detection of COVID-19 in X-ray images. Comput Biol Med. 2021;136:104704.

    6. Indexed at, Google scholar , Cross ref

  6. Yang X, Le Minh H, Cheng KT, et al. Renal compartment segmentation in DCE-MRI images. Med Image Anal. 2016;32:269-80.

    7. Indexed at , Google scholar, Cross ref

  7. Kistler AD, Poster D, Krauer F, et al. Increases in kidney volume in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease can be detected within 6months. Kidney int. 2009;75(2):235-41.

    8. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  8. Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Eckardt KU, et al. Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): Executive summary from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2015;88(1):17-27.

    9. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  9. Hohmann E. Editorial commentary: Big data and machine learning in medicine. J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2022;38(3):848-9.

    10. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  10. Momeny M, Neshat AA, Hussain MA, et al . Learning-to-augment strategy using noisy and denoised data: Improving generalizability of deep CNN for the detection of COVID-19 in X-ray images. Comput Biol Med. 2021;136:104704.

    11. Indexed at, Google scholar , Cross ref

     

Get the App